Distillation System Assessment

This second aspect is important when the capacity of a distillation system must be assessed, or when such a system must be designed. The capacity is sufficient if all the vapor produced by an exothermal reaction can be conducted from the reactor to the condenser, where it must be entirely condensed ... 

Knowledge of the equilibrium is a fundamental prerequisite for the design of non-reactive as well as reactive distillation processes. However, the equilibrium in reactive distillation systems is more complex since the chemical equilibrium is superimposed on the vapor-liquid equilibrium. Surprisingly, the combination of reaction and distillation might lead to the formation of reactive azeotropes. This phenomenon has been described theoretically [2] and experimentally [3] and adds new considerations to feasibility analysis in RD [4]. Such reactive azeotropes cause the same difficulties and limitations in reactive distillation as azeotropes do in conventional distillation. On the basis of thermodynamic methods it is well known that feasibility should be assessed at the limit of established physical and chemical equilibrium. Unfortunately, we mostly deal with systems in the kinetic regime caused by finite reaction rates, mass transfer limitations and/or slow side-reactions. This might lead to different column structures depending on the severity of the kinetic limitations [5], However, feasibility studies should identify new column sequences, for example fully reactive columns, non-reactive columns, and/or hybrid columns, that deserve more detailed evaluation. 

Gryta M. The assessment of microorganism growth in the membrane distillation system. Desalination 142 (1) (2002) 79-88. 

We have described five criteria that are the most frequently used. Sometimes these criteria recommend the same control tray location. In other cases, they recommend different control tray locations. In the next sections, we apply these criteria to several typical industrial distillation systems to assess their relative effectiveness. 

One of the early steps of assessing the distillation system is to obtain good material and energy balances. Otherwise, it could be possible that assessment yields misleading conclusions. 

The first problem is taken from [28], and illustrates the use of controller parametrization within an optimization-based fiamework to assess the dynamic operability of processes exhibiting combinations of performance-limiting characteristics. The process considered is a binary distillation system analyzed in [7] represented by the transfer function model... 

The above terminology is the author s own. However, it is straightforward and, when applied to any distillation system involving discrete components, will result in a rapid qualitative assessment of tray-reflux requirements. 

The first example of biphasic catalysis was actually described for an ionic liquid system. In 1972, one year before Manassen proposed aqueous-organic biphasic catalysis [1], Par shall reported that the hydrogenation and alkoxycarbonylation of alkenes could be catalysed by PtCh when dissolved in tetraalkylammonium chloride/tin dichloride at temperatures of less than 100 °C [2], It was even noted that the product could be separated by decantation or distillation. Since this nascent study, synthetic chemistry in ionic liquids has developed at an incredible rate. In this chapter, we explore the different types of ionic liquids available and assess the factors that give rise to their low melting points. This is followed by an evaluation of synthetic methods used to prepare ionic liquids and the problems associated with these methods. The physical properties of ionic liquids are then described and a summary of the properties of ionic liquids that are attractive to clean synthesis is then given. The techniques that have been developed to improve catalyst solubility in ionic liquids to prevent leaching into the organic phase are also covered. 

Physical properties of the three test fuels are presented in Table I. Except for the surface tension of No. 6 fuel oil, which was a typical value, all properties were measured for the specific samples tested. The primary differences between the SRC-II middle distillate and the No. 2 fuel were the higher specific gravity, surface tension, and viscosity of the SRC-II. The No. 6 grade fuel, a residual fuel oil, had a much higher viscosity than either of the distillate fuels. Both the SRC-II and No. 2 fuel oil were sprayed at a nominal temperature of 80°F to simulate usage in a non-preheat combustion system. The No. 6 fuel oil was sprayed at temperatures ranging from 150° to 240°F in order to assess spray formation processes and spray quality over a broad range of viscosities. 

From the basic studies for the S-I cycle we have derived a very detailed operating flow-sheet. It is based on a reactive distillation scheme. This flow-sheet has been designed taking into account present thermodynamics data and chemical engineering techniques. Expert judgements from people working in various areas related to the system were also used to assess each part of the flow-sheet and to validate its efficiency. Figure 1 shows the flow-sheet obtained for the Bunsen section. 

---