Dissociation of CO2 hydrate

In contrast to hydrate formation, hydrate dissociation is an endothermic process in which energy is consumed to break the hydrogen bonds between water molecules and the van der Waals interaction between the guest and water molecules, with the production of water and gas. At around 273 K, the measured dissociation heat of CO2 hydrate varies between 57.66 and 65.22 kJ/mol, with the hydration number of 6.21-7.23 [45 7]. For hydrate with single guest, the amount of heat absorbed by dissociation is equal to that released by formation. As an endothermic process, the hydrate dissociation is t3q)ically dominated by heat transfer but not intrinsic kinetics. 

There are several approaches to dissociate hydrates depressurization, thermal stimulation, thermodynamic inhibitor injection, or a combination of these methods. By depressurization or thermal stimulation, hydrate can be moved across the phase equilibrium fine to the unstable zone. However, inhibitor injection does not aim to change the temperature or pressure conditions of the hydrate but switch the phase equilibrium line to a lower temperature and a higher pressure, leaving the hydrate in the unstable zone. 

Based on its formation and dissociation, CO2 hydrate has many potential applications. As described in detail later, ocean sequestration and CH4/CO2 replacement 

---

This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the fundamentals and applications of CO2 hydrates. Section 10.2 focuses on the microscopic perspective, looking into how gas hydrates form, the three structures of gas hydrates, and the characteristics of CO2 hydrates. From there onwards, the text focuses specifically on CO2 hydrates. The physical properties of CO2 hydrates are considered in Sect. 10.3. Section 10.4 deals with the phase equihbrium of CO2 hydrate. Experimental methods and the phase diagram are showed in this section. The last section covers the applications of CO2 hydrates, including the formation and dissociation of CO2 hydrates, ocean sequestration, the CH4 replacement in hydrates by CO2, and the use of CO2 hydrates in the refrigeration process. 

The catalysis of CO2 hydration by carbonic anhydrase II occurs via the two chemically independent steps outlined in Scheme 2 a general mechanistic profile is found in Fig. 23. The first step involves the association of substrate with enzyme and the chemical conversion of substrate into product. The second step is product dissociation and the regeneration of the catalytically active nucleophile zinc hydroxide (Coleman, 1967). Below, we address the structural aspects of zinc coordination in each of these steps. 

An vigorous CO2 hydrate dissociation was observed in frozen hydrate saturated samples after the pressure release in the pressure chamber. The hydrate coefficient decreased 1.5-3.0 fold in 30 minutes after a pressure drop to atmospheric values. The maximum decrease was observed in the sand sample with 14% of kaolinite particles, the minimum decrease in the sand sample with 7% montmorillonite particles with 17% of initial water content. In the course of time the intensity of CO2 hydrate dissociation in frozen samples dropped sharply with even a complete stop of the dissociation process as a consequence of gas the hydrates self-preservation effect at sub-zero temperatures A... 

Table 2 summarizes the results of CO2 hydrate film formation obtained in trehalose-solution experiments. For both r and AT columns, the upper value is that obtained in the first run, while the lower number in brackets is the average for all subsequent runs with its variation. For trehalose-50 wt% samples, we showed the values in brackets are standard deviation> for 8 times repeating experiments. The equilibrium temperature shift of CO2 hydrate in each trehalose solution ATe = Te- tJ where Tf is the dissociation temperature of CO2 hydrate at the same pressure in pure water system is also roughly... 

Kinetics. - In the course of developing a general kinetic model of hydrate formation/reaction that can be used to establish/optimize technologies for the exploitation of hydrate reservoirs, two aspects of CO2 hydrate formation have been studied. First, a phase field theory of hydrate nucleation was developed for describing the nucleation of CO2 hydrate in aqueous solutions. It has been shown that the phase field theory is eonsiderably more accurate than the sharp-interfaee droplet model of the classieal nueleation theory. The phase field theory prediets considerably smaller height for the nucleation barrier than the elassieal approach. MR imaging was used to monitor hydrate phase transitions in porous media under realistic conditions, and the transformation rates for the relevant processes (hydrate formation, dissociation and recovery) was presented. 

Conversely, if the reaction is carried out in a condensed medium such as water, despite the latter causing multiple equilibria with formation of CO2 hydrated forms (4.4) in addition to the forms of dissociated formic acid (4.5), or if a base (ammonia or other bases) is used that produces formate salts instead of free formic acid, the thermodynamics of the process is favored (AG° = —4 kJ mol for (4.6a) and (4.6b) and AG° = —35 kJ mol for (4.7), respectively) [16-21]. 

Following the thermodynamics (phase equilibrium) of CO2 hydrate, which is time-independent, it is also important to know the time-dependent phenomenon of hydrate, namely, how hydrates form and dissociate. Note that the study of such phenomena is much more challenging than that of the thermodynamic properties. 

For real conditions, the pressure and temperature profiles in the permafrost seem to lie close to region A and B. However, under the deep sea floor, the pressure usually exceeds 10 MPa, and the equilibrium temperature of CO2 hydrate is lower than that of CH4 hydrate at the same pressure, which means CO2 finds it harder to form hydrate than CH4. Hence, the liquid CO2 injected may not be able to form hydrate itself while it dissociates CH4 hydrate. If CO2 is not stored as hydrate but in liquid form, the stability of the reservoir may not be maintained, resulting in the risk of escape of CH4 and CO2. This problem could be avoided if there is a permeability... 

An expression for the ionization of H2CO3 under such conditions (that is, in the presence of dissolved CO2) can be obtained from Kh, the equilibrium constant for the hydration of CO2, and from the first acid dissociation constant for H2CO3 ... 

In another investigation,425 the exchange between [Ce(edta)aq] and hydrated Pb2+, Ni2+ or Co2+ ions again show reaction by dissociation of protonated [Ce(Hedta)aq] as well as by the direct attack of metal ions on [Ce(edta)aq] or [Ce(Hedta)aq]. The kinetic parameters for the Ni2+ or Co2+ ions could be related to the relatively slow (k - 2.6 x 106s 1 for Co2+ and 3.4 x 104 s-1 for Ni2+) water exchange reactions of these ions. The direct attack was interpreted in terms of an intermediate in which one of the carboxylate groups was coordinated to the incoming ion rather than to Ce3+. These reactions were followed by spectrophotometry at 280 nm, where the absorbance of Ce3+aq is much lower than the edta complex. 

When examining the aquatic chemistry of CO2 the first important point is that when CO2 dissolves in water it can then be hydrated to form H2CO3, which can then dissociate to HC03-, and C032-. 

Temperature acts as the most important factor influencing the process of self-preservation of gas hydrates in pore space. The study of sand sample with 7% (Wjn=10%) carried out at different temperature conditions shows that the time of CO2 pore hydrate decomposition in frozen samples varies from 5 hours at -2 C to 60 hours at -13 C. According to our observations, the pore hydrate dissociation process at -20 C stopped in one hour with no further dissociation in the following 40 hours. At the end of the experiment (about 100 hours) the CO2 hydrate content was about 7% in volume. 

The frozen hydrate-saturated media formed during these experiments were used for a study of the CO2 hydrate decomposition kinetics in the pore space. The influence of soil mineral composition, ice content and temperature on the CO2 hydrate self-preservation effect was established. It is revealed, that a temperature decrease slows down the CO2 hydrate dissociation low negative temperatures (below -13 C) cause a complete stop of the CO2 hydrate dissociation process. It is also shown that ice forming in the remaining pore space from freezing of unreacted water enhances the CO2 hydrate self-preservation effect. 

Carbon dioxide is dissolved in the molecular form as a free hydrated CO2 and is usually denoted by the symbol C02(aq). Slightly less than 1% reacts with water to form non-dissociated molecules of H2CO3. Carbon dioxide dissolved in water is called free carbon dioxide and this term is used for the sum of the concentrations of free hydrated CO2 and H2CO3. 

In chemical reactions usually only CO2 or H2CO3 is written, but it always expresses the total quantity of dissolved CO2 in the form of both hydrated CO2 and non-dissociated carbonic acid. 

Extrapolation to low temperatures of the CO2 hydrate dissociation pressure curve measured above 152K by Miller and Smythe [12] suggested to those workers that it should intersect the vapour pressure curve of solid CO2 at about 121K. Below this temperature the hydrate should be unstable relative to solid CO2 and ice. The phase diagram of the carbon dioxide-water system is shown in Figure 1. 

When pulmonary ventilation is reduced, the partial pressure of CO2 increases in the blood. The excess of CO2 is caused by the fact that the diffusion of CO2 through the alveolar wall is much slower than that of oxygen. Inasmuch as the CO2 is rapidly hydrated to yield H2CO3, which is in turn dissociated to yield H +HCO, the absolute concentration of hydrogen ions is increased in blood, and acidosis develops in hypoventilation. 

Equation (2) is consistent with the observed diminution of inhibitor power of anions towards HCO3 dehydration as the pH is increased. An important prediction evident from a comparison of Scheme 1 and 2 is that the term referred to in both schemes as K- represents exactly the same dissociation equilibrium. If these schemes do in fact hold, then the values determined at low pH for the inhibition of both CO2 hydration and HCO3 dehydration should be identical. Inspection of Table III bears this out completely. 

Nevertheless, it should be noted that the actual behavior of hydrate formation and dissociation depends on not only the pressure and temperature of the location but also many other factors, such as the properties of the in situ methane hydrate, the amount of injected CO2, and the characteristics of the pore media. More research needs to be done on the kinetics and mechanism of the interchange of guests, the effects of the above factors, and the equilibrium conditions of gas hydrate with liquid CO2 [74]. Overall, the replacement of CH4 in hydrates with CO2 is a potential method for both recovery of namral gas and long-term storage of CO2. For the first consideration, this method should be used for selected reservoirs with suitable in situ pressure and temperature conditions that are favorable for the exchange process. 

---