Directional atomic orbitals

As shown in Table 1.3 in Sect. 1.1.4, hybridization also implies variations in the orbital electronegativity because of changes in the corresponding nuclear effective charges. This will be reflected in the bonding polarity. 

---

Further, it is observed experimentally that electron-pair bonds are frequently associated with anisotropic, i.e. directed, atomic orbitals. This gives rise to open structures. However, the electrostatic (Madelung) energy associated with ionic crystals favors close packing Therefore largely ionic crystals favor more close-packed, two-sublattice structures such as rock salt versus zinc blende. In the case of two-sublattice structures induced by d electrons, electron-pair bonds are generally prohibited by the metallic or ionic outer s and p electrons that favor close packing. Nevertheless, it will be found in Chapter III, Section II that, if transition element cations are small relative to the anion interstice and simultaneously have Rti RCf electron-pair bonds may be formed below a critical temperature. 

H. Koch, O. Christiansen, R. Kobayashi, P. Jorgensen, and T. Helgaker, Chem. Phys. Lett., 228, 233 (1994). A Direct Atomic Orbital Driven Implementation of the Coupled Cluster Singles and Doubles (CCSD) Model. 

If, now, we are to make the most stable molecule possible, we must make the strongest bonds possible for these we must provide the most strongly directed atomic orbitals that we can. Again, hybridization provides such orbitals three hybrid orbitals, exactly equivalent to each other. Each one has the shape shown in... 

That such a simple model should yield such consistently correct predictions is remarkable. The question is Is it applicable to compounds of transition metals The answer is "Yes," if one limits the discussion to only those molecules that obey the EAN rule. One observes an interesting, surprising — and beautiful — phenomenon. These molecules have geometric structures that appear to depend solely on the number of ligands that are bonded to the metal atom, i.e., the number of pairs of electrons in directed atomic orbitals they obey a form of the VSEPR model. 

Historically, CHF, was favoured over RPA since it could be solved in the atomic orbital basis (Diercksen and McWeeny, 1966), rather than requiring a transformation to the molecular orbital basis. The need for an inverse Hessian in RPA/SOPPA also restricted the size of system that could be studied. However, the use of direct atomic-orbital-driven methods for RPA response properties (Feyereisen et al, 1992) and for SOPPA (Bak et al., 2000 Christiansen et al., 1998a), coupled with iterative methods for solving the inverse Hessian, mean that they can now be applied as widely as CHF/TDHF and provide far more information about excited states and properties. 

Feyereisen, M., Nichols, J., Oddershede, J., and Simons, J. (1992). Direct atomic-orbital-based time-dependent Hartree-Fock calculations of frequency-dependent polarizabilities. J. Chem. Phys., 96, 2978-2987. 

Koch, H., Christiansen, O., Kobayashi, R., Jprgensen, P., and Helgaker, T. (1994). A direct atomic orbital driven implementation of the coupled cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) model. Chem. Phys. Lett, 228, 233-238. 

Agren H, Carravetta V, Vahtras O, Pettersson LGM. Direct, atomic orbital, static exchange calculations of photoabsorption spectra of large molecules and clusters. Chem Phys Lett. 1994 222 75-81. 

Molecules. The electronic configurations of molecules can be built up by direct addition of atomic orbitals (LCAO method) or by considering molecular orbitals which occupy all of the space around the atoms of the molecule (molecular orbital method). 

Election nuclear dynamics theory is a direct nonadiababc dynamics approach to molecular processes and uses an electi onic basis of atomic orbitals attached to dynamical centers, whose positions and momenta are dynamical variables. Although computationally intensive, this approach is general and has a systematic hierarchy of approximations when applied in an ab initio fashion. It can also be applied with semiempirical treatment of electronic degrees of freedom [4]. It is important to recognize that the reactants in this approach are not forced to follow a certain reaction path but for a given set of initial conditions the entire system evolves in time in a completely dynamical manner dictated by the inteiparbcle interactions. 

A is a parameter that can be varied to give the correct amount of ionic character. Another way to view the valence bond picture is that the incorporation of ionic character corrects the overemphasis that the valence bond treatment places on electron correlation. The molecular orbital wavefimction underestimates electron correlation and requires methods such as configuration interaction to correct for it. Although the presence of ionic structures in species such as H2 appears coimterintuitive to many chemists, such species are widely used to explain certain other phenomena such as the ortho/para or meta directing properties of substituted benzene compounds imder electrophilic attack. Moverover, it has been shown that the ionic structures correspond to the deformation of the atomic orbitals when daey are involved in chemical bonds. 

Shapes of atomic orbitals play central roles in governing the types of directional bonds an atom can form. 

Atomic orbital directions also determine what directional bonds an atom will form. 

As another example, the 2s and 2p orbitals on the two N atoms of N2 can be formed into pairs of sp hybrids on each N atom plus a pair of p atomic orbitals on each N atom. The sp hybrids directed... 

In the Hiickel treatment, atomic orbitals on nonadjacent atoms are assumed to have no interacticai. They are neither bonding nor antibonding. The concept of homoconjugation suggests that such orbitals may interact, especially in rigid structures which direct orbitals toward one another. Consider, for example, bicyclo[2.2.1]hepta-2,S-diene ... 

The CPHF equations are linear and can be determined by standard matrix operations. The size of the U matrix is the number of occupied orbitals times the number of virtual orbitals, which in general is quite large, and the CPHF equations are normally solved by iterative methods. Furthermore, as illustrated above, the CPHF equations may be formulated either in an atomic orbital or molecular orbital basis. Although the latter has computational advantages in certain cases, the former is more suitable for use in connection with direct methods (where the atomic integrals are calculated as required), as discussed in Section 3.8.5. 

Hybrid orbital (Section 1.6) An orbital derived from a combination of atomic orbitals. Hybrid orbitals, such as the sp3, s/J2, and sp hybrids of carbon, are strongly directed and form stronger bonds than atomic orbitals do. 

In addition most of the more tractable approaches in density functional theory also involve a return to the use of atomic orbitals in carrying out quantum mechanical calculations since there is no known means of directly obtaining the functional that captures electron density exactly. The work almost invariably falls back on using basis sets of atomic orbitals which means that conceptually we are back to square one and that the promise of density functional methods to work with observable electron density, has not materialized. 

---