Direct molecular dynamics dependency properties

Wigner rotation/adiabatic-to-diabatic transformation matrices, 92 Electronic structure theory, electron nuclear dynamics (END) structure and properties, 326-327 theoretical background, 324-325 time-dependent variational principle (TDVP), general nuclear dynamics, 334-337 Electronic wave function, permutational symmetry, 680-682 Electron nuclear dynamics (END) degenerate states chemistry, xii-xiii direct molecular dynamics, structure and properties, 327 molecular systems, 337-351 final-state analysis, 342-349 intramolecular electron transfer,... 

A sequence of successive configurations from a Monte Carlo simulation constitutes a trajectory in phase space with HyperChem, this trajectory may be saved and played back in the same way as a dynamics trajectory. With appropriate choices of setup parameters, the Monte Carlo method may achieve equilibration more rapidly than molecular dynamics. For some systems, then, Monte Carlo provides a more direct route to equilibrium structural and thermodynamic properties. However, these calculations can be quite long, depending upon the system studied. 

The dynamic behavior of fluid interfaces is usually described in terms of surface rheology. Monolayer-covered interfaces may display dramatically different rheological behavior from that of the clean liquid interface. These time-dependent properties vary with the extent of intermolecular association within the monolayer at a given thermodynamic state, which in turn may be related directly to molecular size, shape, and charge (Manheimer and Schechter, 1970). Two of these time-dependent rheological properties are discussed here surface shear viscosity and dynamic surface tension. 

Let us compare the kinetics of the selective-solvent-induced collapse of protein-like copolymers with the collapse of random and random-block copolymers [18]. Several kinetic criteria were examined using Langevin molecular dynamics simulations. There are some general results, which seem to be independent of the nature of interactions or the kinetic criteria monitored during the collapse. Here, we restrict our analysis to the evolution of the characteristic ratio f = (Rgp/Rg ) that combines the partial mean-square radii of gyration calculated separately for hydrophobic and hydrophilic beads, k2n and Rg . This ratio takes into account both the properties of compactness and solubility for a heteropolymer globule [70] (compactness is directly related to the mean size of the hydrophobic core, whereas solubility should be dependent on the size of the hydrophilic shell). 

To end this section and the review, we mention briefly the first results from the simulation on laboratory-frame cross-correlation of the type (v(f)J (0)). Here v is the molecular center-of-mass linear velocity and J is the molecular angular momentum in the usual laboratory frame of reference. For chiral molecules the center-of-mass linear velocity v seems to be correlated directly in the laboratory frame with the molecule s own angular momentum J at different points r in the time evolution of the molectilar ensemble. This is true in both the presence and absence of an external electric field. These results illustrate the first direct observation of elements of (v(r)J (0)) in the laboratory frame of reference. The racemic modification of physical and molecular dynamical properties depends, therefore, on the theorem (v(r)J (0)) 0 in both static and moving frames of reference. An external electric field enhances considerably the magnitude of the cross-correlations. 

The molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulation methods differ in a variety of ways. The most obvious difference is that molecular dynamics provides information about the time dependence of the properties of the system whereas there is no temporal relationship between successive Monte Carlo configurations. In a Monte Carlo simulation the outcome of each trial move depends only upon its immediate predecessor, whereas in molecular dynamics it is possible to predict the configuration of the system at any time in the future - or indeed at any time in the past. Molecular dynamics has a kinetic energy contribution to the total energy whereas in a Monte Carlo simulation the total energy is determined directly from the potential energy function. The two simulation methods also sample from different ensembles. Molecular dynamics is traditionally performed under conditions of constant number of particles (N), volume (V) and energy (E) (the microcanonical or constant NVE ensemble) whereas a traditional Monte Carlo simulation samples from the canonical ensemble (constant N, V and temperature, T). Both the molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo techniques can be modified to sample from other ensembles for example, molecular dynamics can be adapted to simulate from the canonical ensemble. Two other ensembles are common ... 

The principal advantage of the time correlation function method is that it provides a new set of microscopic functions for a fluid, the time correlation functions, which can be studied directly by experimental observations of the fluidt or by computer-simulated molecular dynamics. The time correlation functions depend even more sensitively on the microscopic properties of the fluid molecules than the transport coefficients, which are expressed as time integrals of the correlation functions. Thus, a further test of kinetic theory has been found it must not only lead to expressions for the transport coefficients for dilute and dense gases that are in agreement with experiment, but also describe the dependence of the time correlation functions on both time and the density of the gas. One of the principal successes of kinetic theory is that it provides a quantitatively correct description of the short- and long-time... 

---