Dirac equation theory

The Dirac equation can be readily adapted to the description of one electron in the held of the other electrons (Hartree-Fock theory). This is called a Dirac-Fock or Dirac-Hartree-Fock (DHF) calculation. 

Relativistic density functional theory can be used for all electron calculations. Relativistic DFT can be formulated using the Pauli formula or the zero-order regular approximation (ZORA). ZORA calculations include only the zero-order term in a power series expansion of the Dirac equation. ZORA is generally regarded as the superior method. The Pauli method is known to be unreliable for very heavy elements, such as actinides. 

Before embarking on the problem of the interaction of the negaton-positon field with the quantized electromagnetic field, we shall first consider the case of the negaton-positon field interacting with an external, classical (prescribed) electromagnetic field. We shall also outline in the present chapter those aspects of the theory of the S-matrix that will be required for the treatment of quantum electrodynamics. Section 10.4 presents a treatment of the Dirac equation in an external field. 

Kutzelnigg, W. (1989) Perturbation theory of relativistic corrections 1. The non-relativistic limit of the Dirac equation and a direct perturbation expansion. Zeitschrifi fur Physik D, 11, 15-28. 

Despite the complication due to the interdependence of orbital and spin angular momenta, the Dirac equation for a central field can be separated in spherical polar coordinates [63]. The energy eigenvalues for the hydrogen atom (V(r) = e2/r, in electrostatic units), are equivalent to the relativistic terms of the old quantum theory [64]... 

A particularly interesting feature of the theory [9] is the incorporation of deviations from Coulomb scattering due to the nonvanishing size of the projectile nucleus. The very fact that the theory is based on the Dirac equation and that spin dependences enter nontrivially indicates that quantum mechanics is essential here. Moreover, at the highest energies considered, pair production becomes important, i.e., an effect that does not have a classical equivalent [57]. 

We then turn to the question of how to eliminate the spin-orbit interaction in four-component relativistic calculations. This allows the assessment of spin-orbit effects on molecular properties within the framework of a single theory. In a previous publication [13], we have shown how the spin-orbit interaction can be eliminated in four-component relativistic calculations of spectroscopic properties by deleting the quaternion imaginary parts of matrix representations of the quaternion modified Dirac equation. We show in this chapter how the application of the same procedure to second-order electric properties takes out spin-forbidden transitions in the spectrum of the mercury atom. Second-order magnetic properties require more care since the straightforward application of the above procedure will extinguish all spin interactions. After careful analysis on how to proceed we... 

However, it is more appropriate to provide theoretical justifications for such use. In this respect, first, we introduce the third category of decoupling of positive and negative states commonly known as the direct perturbation theory . This approach does not suffer from the singularity problems described previously. However, the four-component form of the Dirac equation remains intact. The new Hamiltonian requires identical computational effort as for the Dirac equation itself, hence it is not an attractive alternative to the Dirac equation. However, it is useful to assess the accuracy of approximate two-component forms derived from the Dirac equation such as Pauli Hamiltonian. Consider the transformation... 

At this point, it is appropriate to present a brief discussion on the origin of the FC operator (d function) in the two-component form (Pauli form) of the molecular relativistic Hamiltonian. Many textbooks adopt the point of view that the FC is a relativistic effect, which must be derived from the Dirac equation [50,51]. In other textbooks or review articles it is stressed that the FC is not a relativistic effect and that it can be derived from classical electrodynamics [52,53] disregarding the origin of the gyromagnetic factor g—2. In some textbooks both derivations are presented [54]. The relativistic derivations suffer from the inherent drawbacks in the Pauli expansion, in particular that the Pauli Hamiltonian can only be used in the context of the first-order perturbation theory. Moreover, the origin of the FC term appears to be different depending on whether one uses the ESC method or FW transformation. 

Methods for treating relativistic effects in molecular quantum mechanics have always seemed to me, if I may say so without appearing too impertinent to those who work in the field, a complete dog s breakfast. The difficulty is to know to what question they are supposed to be the answer, in the circumstances in which we find ourselves. We do not know what a relativistically invariant theory applicable to molecular behaviour might look like. As was pointed out to us at the last meeting, the Dirac equation certainly will not do to describe interacting electrons and even at the single particle level, where it seems to work, there is an inconsistency in interpreting its solutions in terms... 

We will describe, in some detail, one such modification, an effective Dirac equation (EDE) which was derived in a number of papers [7, 8, 9, 10]. This new equation is more convenient in many applications than the original BS equation, and we will derive some general formulae connected with this equation. The physical idea behind this approach is that in the case of a loosely bound system of two particles of different masses, the heavy particle spends almost all its life not far from its own mass shell. In such case some kind of Dirac equation for the light particle in an external Coulomb field should be an excellent starting point for the perturbation theory expansion. Then it is convenient to choose the free two-particle propagator in the form of the product of the heavy particle mass shell projector A and the free electron propagator... 

The only apparent difference of the EDE (1.23) from the regular Dirac equation is connected with the dependence of the interaction kernels on energy. Respectively the perturbation theory series in (1.25) contain, unlike the regular nonrelativistic perturbation series, derivatives of the interaction kernels over energy. The presence of these derivatives is crucial for cancellation of the ultraviolet divergences in the expressions for the energy eigenvalues. 

This experimental development was matched by rapid theoretical progress, and the comparison and interplay between theory and experiment has been important in the field of metrology, leading to higher precision in the determination of the fundamental constants. We feel that now is a good time to review modern bound state theory. The theory of hydrogenic bound states is widely described in the literature. The basics of nonrelativistic theory are contained in any textbook on quantum mechanics, and the relativistic Dirac equation and the Lamb shift are discussed in any textbook on quantum electrodynamics and quantum field theory. An excellent source for the early results is the classic book by Bethe and Salpeter [6]. A number of excellent reviews contain more recent theoretical results, and a representative, but far from exhaustive, list of these reviews includes [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. 

Relativity becomes important for elements heavier than the first row transition elements. Most methods applicable on molecules are derived from the Dirac equation. The Dirac equation itself is difficult to use, since it involves a description of the wave function as a four component spinor. The Dirac equation can be approximately brought to a two-component form using e.g. the Foldy-Wouthuysen (FW) transformational,12]. Unfortunately the FW transformation, as originally proposed, is both quite complicated and also divergent in the expansion in the momentum (for large momenta), and it can thus only be carried out approximately (usually to low orders). The resulting equations are not variationally stable, and they are used only in first order perturbation theory. 

In standard quantum field theory, particles are identified as (positive frequency) solutions ijj of the Dirac equation (p — m) fj = 0, with p = y p, m is the rest mass and p the four-momentum operator, and antiparticles (the CP conjugates, where P is parity or spatial inversion) as positive energy (and frequency) solutions of the adjoint equation (p + m) fi = 0. This requires Cq to be linear e u must be transformed into itself. Indeed, the Dirac equation and its adjoint are unitarily equivalent, being linked by a unitary transformation (a sign reversal) of the y matrices. Hence Cq is unitary. 

---