Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Singularity problems

The BFGS method is considered to be superior to DFP in most cases because (a) it is less prone to loss of positive definiteness or to singularity problems... [Pg.77]

The denominator in Equation 4.100 is the (absolute) size of all Lasso regression parameters for a particular choice of AL (compare Equation 4.89), and the nominator describes the maximal possible (absolute) size of the Lasso regression parameters (in case there is no singularity problem this would correspond to the OLS solution). The optimal choice is at a fraction of 0.3 which corresponds to a MSEPCy of 63.4 and to a SEPCv of 7.7. [Pg.196]

However, it is more appropriate to provide theoretical justifications for such use. In this respect, first, we introduce the third category of decoupling of positive and negative states commonly known as the direct perturbation theory . This approach does not suffer from the singularity problems described previously. However, the four-component form of the Dirac equation remains intact. The new Hamiltonian requires identical computational effort as for the Dirac equation itself, hence it is not an attractive alternative to the Dirac equation. However, it is useful to assess the accuracy of approximate two-component forms derived from the Dirac equation such as Pauli Hamiltonian. Consider the transformation... [Pg.451]

The X-ray singularity problem was originally solved in the asymptotic limit and the complicated many-body problem was turned into an effective one-particle problem (219). For the X-ray photon frequency threshold frequency (o0, the absorption spectrum g(m) for the process in which a deep, structureless core electron is excited to the conduction band by the absorption of an X-ray of frequency w is expressed by the power law... [Pg.214]

The basic principles on which the Hansch multiple parameter method for structure-activity correlation depends are described. These are compared with the basic features of the Free-Wilson method for assigning additivity constants to structural features of related compounds. An example is given for which the two methods of analysis have led to similar structure-activity relationships. Factors which determine the particular method to use in a new situation are discussed. The Free-Wilson method is presented in considerable operational detail with special emphasis on the detection and avoidance of situations which lead to singularity problems in solution of the matrix. Favorable analyses, which result in additivity constants that can be correlated with known physical constants, may lead to predictions for new compounds not covered in the original matrix. [Pg.121]

This explains why Hudson, Bass, and Purcell (7) obtained two different solutions to a matrix by making different substitutions using the restrictive equations. Their presentation of the matrix used is not in its most expanded form but is contracted by application of the restrictive equations this makes it difficult to visualize the singularity problems. When their matrix is rewritten in the complete form, it becomes readily apparent that their Compounds 3 and 4 are involved in a singu-... [Pg.132]

In ref. 144 the author presents the construction of a non-standard explicit algorithm for initial-value problems. The order of the developed method is two and also is A-stable. The new proposed method is proven to be suitable for solving different kind of initial-value problems such as non-singular problems, singular problems, stiff problems and singularly perturbed problems. Some numerical experiments are considered in order to check the behaviour of the method when applied to a variety of initial-value problems. [Pg.399]

We need input data verification to prevent singular problems (structural and numerical singularity). [Pg.1341]

VBOs applying Chedin s sextic empirical force field [80] are presented in Table 9.3 for 02 using exactly the same potential with the internal and normal coordinate Hamiltonians. When comparison can be made, the two approaches result in the same eigenenergies. It is also worth mentioning that for CO2 no convergence (singularity) problems appeared, in clear contrast to the case of fhe nonlinear H2O molecule. [Pg.168]

Since at all quantities have to match, i.e. u, ]8 and f, we replace the singularity problem by a steadiness problem. Moreover p has to be only time dependent. [Pg.239]

Requires a broad perspective of the event to identify unrelated problems Helps to identify where deviations from acceptable methods occurred A singular problem technique that can be used in support of a largo-... [Pg.127]

Equation [9] highlights the most frequent problem in multiple linear regression, namely, the matrix whose inverse must be calculated, (C C), may suffer from collinearity or singularity problems. The matrix may not possess... [Pg.179]


See other pages where Singularity problems is mentioned: [Pg.595]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.565]    [Pg.641]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.616]    [Pg.745]    [Pg.579]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.780]    [Pg.2330]    [Pg.208]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.63 ]




SEARCH



Singular

Singularities

© 2024 chempedia.info