Dipolar interactions, dynamic range

Feg). Subsequently, thermodynamic properties of spins weakly coupled by the dipolar interaction are calculated. Dipolar interaction is, due to its long range and reduced symmetry, difficult to treat analytically most previous work on dipolar interaction is therefore numerical [10-13]. Here thermodynamic perturbation theory will be used to treat weak dipolar interaction analytically. Finally, the dynamical properties of magnetic nanoparticles are reviewed with focus on how relaxation time and superparamegnetic blocking are affected by weak dipolar interaction. For notational simplicity, it will be assumed throughout this section that the parameters characterizing different nanoparticles are identical (e.g., volume and anisotropy). 

In general, multiple pulse techniques sufficiently average the dipolar interactions, compress the chemical shift scale, but they do not affect heteronuclear dipolar interactions and the chemical shift anisotropy. A combination of both multiple pulse techniques and magic angle spinning, so-called CRAMPS (Combined Rotational And Multiple Pulse Spectroscopy) is found to yield satisfactory results in the solid state H NMR of solids 186). The limitations of all these techniques, from the analytical point of view, arises from the relatively small chemical shift range (about 10 ppm) as compared with some other frequently studied nuclei. However, high resolution H NMR of solids is useful in studies of molecular dynamics. 

The above short-range potential is the single most important difference between this system and those simulated by Bossis et al. in their work on the calculation of the dielectric constant via molecular dynamics simulation. The form (6.3) has been adopted to be consistent with the bidimensional electrostatics employed for the dipolar interaction. 

The first member on the right in expression (38) is the relaxation rate caused by dimmers of the pure material. The second member arises from dynamics of the benzoic acid dimers contained within the range of the thiondigo quest molecule 7j-1 (ffl) is stipulated by modulation of proton dipolar interaction induced by the proton transfer in the hydrogen bonds. 

Measured RDC values are representative averages of the whole ensemble of dipolar interactions within protein molecules in solution. Such an ensemble should include all protein conformers interconverting at time scales faster than the inverse of RDC values HD). For instance, the observed dipolar coupling is affected by the intemuclei or bond vectors that stretch and vibrate on a femtosecond to nanosecond (fs-ns) time scale, the protein domain reorientation on a nanosecond to microsecond (ns-ps) time scale, and conformational change that ranges from nanoseconds, e.g., unstructured terminus, to milliseconds. It is nearly impossible to describe protein structure and dynamics using RDC values without any assumptions. Some approximations have to be made in interpreting RDC measurements. 

Initially, NMR spectroscopy studies were difficult to perform as the nuclide is inherently less sensitive ( 100-fold) than (Table 1). Fm hermore, with a nuclear spin of unity the signals were broader and resolution problems were common. In addition, the dynamic range (100% natural abimdance) is much smaller than is the case for H. Howevei by now, the tremendous improvements that have been achieved in spectrometer performance are such that is now an attractive nucleus for NMR studies. Thus, spectra can be obtained in a short time interval at the natural abimdance level so that for many applications it is not necessary to spend time synthesizing deuteriated compounds. Second, the small differences that exist in the natural abundance levels of different compounds, and of even different hydrogens within the same compound, can be exploited. Finally, the development of magic angle spinning (MAS), which reduces dipolar and other anisotropic interactions, makes it possible to produce NMR... 

Estimates of distances between parts of proteins or assemblies of proteins with other species can be made by exploiting diffraction, energy transfer, and dipolar interactions. The most common of these methods have been X-ray diffraction, fluorescence energy transfer, NMR, and EPR. Each physical method provides a different perspective, and multiple methods are needed to achieve a full view (2). For each method, key questions include for what species is it appropriate, what range of distances can be measured, how sensitive is the method to distributions in distance or in orientation, and what is the accuracy and precision of the method. Furthermore, one wants to know whether a method is sensitive to dynamics, and whether this sensitivity blurs the distance measurement or is an opportunity to measure dynamics of distances. 

Among the massive array of experimental methods, based on many different physical phenomena, able to afford structural information, NMR spectroscopy plays a central role. Indeed, parameters such as chemical shifts (5iso), chemical shift tensors (5n,522,533), homonuclear and heteronnclar dipolar interactions (D), chemical shift anisotropy (CSA), relaxation times (Ti, T2, Tip), and lineshape (Am) allow the investigation of short range structural environments (HB and nuclear proximities) as well as the evaluation of slow and fast dynamic processes. 

The effective matrix elements Hfj describe only the intramolecular terms associated with the chemical bonding but do not take into account long range and intermolecular interactions. For instance, the dipolar interaction between a solute and the molecules of a polar solvent are not accounted by the plain EHT matrix elements. Since semiempirical methods are much faster, the limitations imposed by the use of a continuum dielectric model for the solvent, which do not provide a good approximation for the immediate solvation shells in the vicinity of the solute or near the solid surface, can be overcome by atomistic quantum mechanical models for the solvent. Dynamic solvation effects can also be included through the semiempirical models. The hybrid QM/MM methods are also a valuable alternative to describe the dynamic effects of solvents on the quantum dynamics of the solute. The dipoles can be either intrinsic or induced. In the case of polar solvents, the electronic part of the dipole moment produced by the kth solvent molecule is f k f),... 

---