Dimensionality cross-over

As shown in Fig. 12, another regime of relaxation is reached at very low temperature (7 <8 K), where a behavior l/T, oc Tis recovered [51, 69, 70, 144]. The low temperature regime looks like a Korringa law with an enhancement factor of the order 10 with respect to the regime r>30 K. It has been first proposed that this change in behavior for the enhancement originates in the dimensionality cross-over of one-particle coherence and the restoration of a Fermi liquid component in two directions. It is still an open problem to decide whether the Fermi liquid properties recovered below 8 K are those of a 2-D or 3-D electron gas. Furthermore the intermediate temperature regime 8 K ... 

The situation in TTF-TCNQ is potentially much richer than that in KCP. Transverse correlations in this material are probably considerably, stronger in one than in the other of the two transverse directions. This can lead to a complicated 3—2 — 1 dimensional cross-over for n — 2. Empirically2 , however, the fluctuation tails do not seem to be as large in this material as they are in KCP. It might well be that the structural transition in TTF-TCNQ falls into the symmetric limit, with only the fluctuations enhanced. It would be interesting therefore to have more data about the temperature behaviour of all three, or at least of two correlation lengths. 

Polyphenols. Another increa singly important example of the chemical stabilization process is the production of phenoHc foams (59—62) by cross-linking polyphenols (resoles and novolacs) (see Phenolic resins). The principal features of phenoHc foams are low flammabiUty, solvent resistance, and excellent dimensional stabiUty over a wide temperature range (59), so that they are good thermal iasulating materials. 

This formula, aside from the prefactor, is simply a one-dimensional Gamov factor for tunneling in the barrier shown in fig. 12. The temperature dependence of k, being Arrhenius at high temperatures, levels off to near the cross-over temperature which, for A = 0, is equal to ... 

This formula, however, tacitly supposes that the instanton period depends monotonically on its amplitude so that the zero-amplitude vibrations in the upside-down barrier possess the smallest possible period 2nla>. This is obvious for sufficiently nonpathological one-dimensional potentials, but in two dimensions this is not necessarily the case. Benderskii et al. [1993] have found that there are certain cases of strongly bent two-dimensional PES when the instanton period has a minimum at a finite amplitude. Therefore, the cross-over temperature, formally defined as the lowest temperature at which the instanton still exists, turns out to be higher than that predicted by (4.7). At 7 > Tc the trivial solution Q= Q Q is the saddle-point coordinate) emerges instead of instanton, the action equals S = pV (where F " is the barrier height at the saddle point) and the Arrhenius dependence k oc exp( — F ") holds. 

Fig. 4. Illustrative model of paths between two trap sites embedded in a three-dimensional cubic lattice. The dashed 24-link line has 7 unnecessary kinks which reduce its contribution to the path sum, but there are many of them (Table 2) note that the kinks in the figure are two-dimensional but the count in Eq. 17 is three-dimensional. The paths corresponding to terms in Eq. 14 may in general cross over themselves and backtrack, but may not visit the initial or final sites twice. The latter condition does not arise directly from Eq. 13 but rather from the irreversibility concept underlying the theory of the rate constant...

Yamamoto and coworkers used two-dimensional, nuclear Over-hauser effect experiments (NOESY) to determine the proximity of particular protons situated on an included p-nitrophenolate ion to particular protons of a host alpha cyclodextrin molecule. The experiments showed cross-peaks connecting the H-3 resonance of alpha cyclodextrin to both meta and ortho proton resonances of the p-nitrophenolate ion, whereas H-5 of the alpha cyclodextrin gave a cross-peak only with the resonance of the meta proton thereof. As a consequence, it was unequivocally confirmed that the p-nitrophenolate ion is, in solution, preferentially included with its nitro group oriented to the narrow end of the alpha cyclodextrin... 

The picture presented above is not complete as it neglects non-mean field behavior of polymer blends in the temperature range close to Tc [149]. The Ising model predicts phase diagrams of thin films, which are more depressed and more flattened than those yielded by mean field approach (as marked in Fig. 31d). Both effects were shown by Monte Carlo simulations performed by Rouault et al. [150]. In principle, critical regions of phase diagrams cannot be described merely by a cross-over from a three- to two-dimensional (for very thin films) situation. In addition, a cross-over from mean field to Ising behavior should also be considered [6,150]. 

A mean field theory has recently been developed to describe polymer blend confined in a thin film (Sect. 3.2.1). This theory includes both surface fields exerted by two external interfaces bounding thin film. A clear picture of this situation is obtained within a Cahn plot, topologically equivalent to the profile s phase portrait d( >/dz vs < >. It predicts two equilibrium morphologies for blends with separated coexisting phases a bilayer structure for antisymmetric surfaces (each attracting different blend component, Fig. 32) and two-dimensional domains for symmetric surfaces (Fig. 31), both observed [94,114,115,117] experimentally. Four finite size effects are predicted by the theory and observed in pioneer experiments [92,121,130,172,220] (see Sect. 3.2.2) focused on (i) surface segregation (ii) the shape of an intrinsic bilayer profile (iii) coexistence conditions (iv) interfacial width. The size effects (i)-(iii) are closely related, while (i) and (ii) are expected to occur for film thickness D smaller than 6-10 times the value of the intrinsic (mean field) interfacial width w. This cross-over D/w ratio is an approximate evaluation, as the exact value depends strongly on the... 

Figure 4.23. Cross-over in reaction efficiency as a function of system geometry for M X M X N lattices. The vertical axis calibrates the eccentricity s = N/M and the horizontal axis calibrates the surface-to-volume ratio S/V (see text). To the right of the hatched area, random d = 3 diffusion to an internal, centrosymmetric reaction center in the compartmentalized system is the more efficient process. To the left of the hatched area, reduction of dimensionality in the d = 3 flow of the diffusing coreactant to a restricted d = 2 flow upon first encounter with the boundary of the compartmentalized system is the more efficient process. The lines delimiting the hatched region give upper and lower bounds on the critical crossover geometries.

A number of developments to further improve the resolution and specificity of the method have been reported [78,79], namely cross-over electrophoresis, rocket electrophoresis, two-dimensional Immunoelectrophoresis, and radioimmunoassay. 

Interestingly, most research efforts with polymer microfluidic structures have focused on applying the same planar two-dimensional layouts of glass microchips in plastic devices. However, multilayer microstructures, wherein multiple channels can cross over one another without contamination, would significantly increase the operational flexibility in miniaturized analysis. Multilayer microfluidics have been fabricated in glass, and PDMS/glass hybrid microchips.However,... 

Further, the cross plane (y-z) problem is reduced to one-dimensional averaged (over y) transport through the membrane and electrodes. A fitted averaged diffusion parameter (S, ) is used to describe diffusive concentration differences of Oxygen from channel averages to catalyst sites. Similarly, a fitted parameter 7 describes diffusive effects of water vapor from catalyst sites to channels. Temperature profiles are considered to be constant in y, and the values through the unit cell at various locations are denoted by 0, with a subscript as shown in Figure 9.2. 

---