Diffusion potentiostatic method

The potentiostatic method is less ambiguous than the galvanostatic one. Its application, however, requires more sophisticated instrumentation. The rise time of the potentiostat should be fast enough to ensure rapid step change of the potential. Errors may arise from slow rise times as well as from current integration. With porous electrodes, all sites may not be under the same potential diffusion of reactant into or out of the pores may be slow compared with the potential change, which can lead to incorrect estimates of surface coverage and utilization. 

The electrical double-layer structure of a Pt/DMSO interface has been investigated using the potentiostatic pulse method.805 The value of C at E = const, as well as the potential of the diffuse layer minimum, have been found to depend on time, and this has been explained by the chemisorption of DMSO dipoles on the Pt surface, whose strength depends on time. Eg=Q has been found11 at E = -0.64 V (SCE in H2O). 

The principle of this method is quite simple The electrode is kept at the equilibrium potential at times t < 0 at t = 0 a potential step of magnitude r) is applied with the aid of a potentiostat (a device that keeps the potential constant at a preset value), and the current transient is recorded. Since the surface concentrations of the reactants change as the reaction proceeds, the current varies with time, and will generally decrease. Transport to and from the electrode is by diffusion. In the case of a simple redox reaction obeying the Butler-Volmer law, the diffusion equation can be solved explicitly, and the transient of the current density j(t) is (see Fig. 13.1) ... 

As mentioned in potentiostatic current transient method, when the fractal dimension is determined by using diffusion-limited electrochemical technique, the diffusion layer length acts as a yardstick length.122 In the case of cyclic voltammetry, it was... 

It now remains to calculate the diffusion currents, zrequired times. An apparently simple way would be to use a substance fairly similar to Ox (or having a similar diffusion coefficient) capable of being reduced simply by a diffusion process (or, without coupled chemical reactions) through a process involving n + 2 electrons. A solution of this substance could therefore be prepared with the same molarity as that containing Ox, such that one can measure the potentiostatic current at the required times. In practice, however, this method is quite laborious. 

A second, easier method to follow is based on the fact that in the potentiostatic experiment on Ox at long times n + n2 electrons have passed so that the current is purely diffusive. Therefore, by the use of such current values, recalling that i is proportional to t l/2 for diffusive processes, one can determine the values of id at the various times of interest. 

The homogeneous catalysis method is suitable to measure rate constants over a very wide range, up to the diffusion limit. The lower limit is determined by interferences, such as convection, which occur at very slow scan rates. It is our experience that, unless special precautions are taken, scan rates below lOOmV/s result in significant deviations from a purely diffusion-controlled voltammetric wave. For small values of rate constants (down to 10 s ), other potentiostatic techniques are best suited, such as chronoamperometry at a rotating disk electrode UV dip probe and stopped-flow UV-vis techniques. ... 

Potentiostat makes (IR + T ) a constant, may mean q varies unintentionally with time unless IR error electronically compensated. However, math analysts involving diffusion and intermediate radicals difficult and may involve inapplicable assumptions. Spectroscopic methods better radical catchers ... 

Using the faradaic current derived from a redox reaction at an electrode a versatile chemical analytical method can be established. Applying a distinct potentiostatically controlled voltage between a working electrode and the electrolyte, with the redox species electrochemically converted only at the electrodes, results in a stationary current following Eq. 3. In this case, a diffusion controlled measurement of redox species can be obtained. 

As explained earlier, in transient electrochemical methods an electrical perturbation (potential, current, charge, and so on) is imposed at the working electrode during a time period 0 (usually less than 10 s) short enough for the diffusion layer 8 (2D0) to be smaller than the convection layer (S onv imposed by natural convection. Thus the electrochemical response of the system investigated depends on the exact perturbation as well as on the elapsed time. This duality is apparent when one considers a double-pulse potentiostatic perturbation applied to the electrode as in the double-step chronoampero-metric method. 

Let us consider, for example, the simple nernstian reduction reaction in Eq. (221) and a solution containing initially only the reactant R. Before any electrochemical perturbation the electrode rest potential Ej is made largely positive to E . At time zero the potential is stepped to a value E2, sufficiently negative to E , so that the concentration of R is close to zero at the electrode surface. After a time 6, the electrode potential is stepped back to El, so that the concentration of P at the electrode surface becomes zero. When this potentiostatic perturbation, represented in Fig. 21a, is applied in a steady-state method, the R and P concentration profiles are linear and depend only on the electrode potential but not on time, as shown in Fig. 20a (for k 0). Yet when the same perturbation is applied in transient methods, the concentration profiles are curved and time dependent, as evidenced in Fig. 21b. Thus it is seen from this figure that a step duration at Ei, much longer than the step duration 0 at E2, is needed for the initial concentration profiles to be restored. This hysterisis corresponds to the propagation of the diffusion perturbation within the solution, which then keeps a memory of the past perturbation. This information is stored via the structuring of the concentrations in the space near the electrode as a function of the elapsed time. 

The potentiostatic current transient (PCT) technique has been known as the most popular method to understand lithium transport through an intercalation electrode, based on the assumption that lithium diffusion in the electrode is the rate-determining process of lithium intercalation/deintercalation [45]. By solving Eick s second equation for planar geometry with I.C. in Equation (5.28), impermeable B.C. in Equation (5.29), and potentiostatic B.C. 

Attempts to obtain transport number information by various methods such as pulsed field gradient NMR [62], radio tracer diffusion [77], and potentiostat-ic polarization technique [46] have suggested that both cation and anion mobilities are important for the total ionic conductivity seen. In general, however, the nature of charge carriers in polymer electrolytes is quite complex and ion aggregates such as triple ions have been implicated in conductivity [78-79]. 

For the study of diffusion phenomena in solids it is also possible to work with potential pulses (potentiostatic pulses) or with constant current pulses (galvanostatic pulses). Examples described in the following paragraphs are based on the coulometric titration method described in Chapter 3. Weppner and Huggins reviewed these methods.In a continuous series of pulses the concentration of lithium in a sheet of aluminum is increased. The diffusion in each pulse is followed by either potential or current measurements. 

---