Diffusion effects laminar flow

The complete expression for the effective diffusion, under laminar flow conditions, has been derived by Van den Broeck [24] for both short (t < a2/ D) time scales... 

As our first application, we consider the classical Taylor-Aris problem (Aris, 1956 Taylor, 1953) that illustrates dispersion due to transverse velocity gradients and molecular diffusion in laminar flow tubular reactors. In the traditional reaction engineering literature, dispersion effects are described by the axial dispersion model with Danckwerts boundary conditions (Froment and Bischoff, 1990 Levenspiel, 1999 Wen and Fan, 1975). Here, we show that the inconsistencies associated with the traditional parabolic form of the dispersion model can be removed by expressing the averaged model in a hyperbolic form. We also analyze the hyperbolic model and show that it has a much larger range of validity than the standard parabolic model. 

An approximate analytical solution has been developed to calculate the exit concentration from a continuously recirculating facilitated transport liquid membrane system. The system is modeled as a series of SLM-CSTR pairs. The solution allows for two-dimensional transport (axial convective and radial diffusive) and laminar flow. The solution allows one to estimate the effect of a change in system variables on the operating performance. Comparison with experimental data was very good. 

NPei and NRtt are based on the equivalent sphere diameters and on the nominal velocities ug and which in turn are based on the holdup of gas and liquid. The Schmidt number is included in the correlation partly because the range of variables covers part of the laminar-flow region (NRei < 1) and the transition region (1 < NRtl < 100) where molecular diffusion may contribute to axial mixing, and partly because the kinematic viscosity (changes of which were found to have no effect on axial mixing) is thereby eliminated from the correlation. 

Laminar flow reactors have concentration and temperature gradients in both the radial and axial directions. The radial gradient normally has a much greater effect on reactor performance. The diffusive flux is a vector that depends on concentration gradients. The flux in the axial direction is... 

Again, care has to be taken for the non-ideal (or real) behavior of the measurement system. Applications are limited by non-specific absorption of molecules on the surface, mass transfer effects (under conditions of laminar flow a 1-5-pm layer between sensor surface and volume flow is not whirled and has to be passed by passive diffusion) or limited access for the immobilized molecules [158-160]. 

We consider steady-state, one-dimensional laminar flow (q ) through a cylindrical vessel of constant cross-section, with no axial or radial diffusion, and no entry-length effect, as illustrated in the central portion of Figure 2.5. The length of the vessel is L and its radius is R. The parabolic velocity profile u(r) is given by equation 2.5-1, and the mean velocity u by equation 2.5-2 ... 

The mean profiles of velocity, temperature and solute concentration are relatively flat over most of a turbulent flow field. As an example, in Figure 1.24 the velocity profile for turbulent flow in a pipe is compared with the profile for laminar flow with the same volumetric flow rate. As the turbulent fluxes are very high but the velocity, temperature and concentration gradients are relatively small, it follows that the effective diffusivities (iH-e), (a+eH) and (2+ed) must be extremely large. In the main part of the turbulent flow, ie away from the walls, the eddy diffusivities are much larger than the corresponding molecular diffusivities ... 

Figures 13.15 and 13.16 show the findings for flow in pipes. This model represents turbulent flow, but only represents streamline flow in pipes when the pipe is long enough to achieve radial uniformity of a pulse of tracer. For liquids this may require a rather long pipe, and Fig. 13.16 shows these results. Note that molecular diffusion strongly affects the rate of dispersion in laminar flow. At low flow rate it promotes dispersion at higher flow rate it has the opposite effect.

Taylor (T2) and Westhaver (W5, W6, W7) have discussed the relationship between dispersion models. For laminar flow in round empty tubes, they showed that dispersion due to molecular diffusion and radial velocity variations may be represented by flow with a flat velocity profile equal to the actual mean velocity, u, and with an effective axial dispersion coefficient Djf = However, in the analysis, Taylor... 

Taylor (T4, T6), in two other articles, used the dispersed plug-flow model for turbulent flow, and Aris s treatment also included this case. Taylor and Aris both conclude that an effective axial-dispersion coefficient Dzf can again be used and that this coefficient is now a function of the well known Fanning friction factor. Tichacek et al. (T8) also considered turbulent flow, and found that Dl was quite sensitive to variations in the velocity profile. Aris further used the method for dispersion in a two-phase system with transfer between phases (All), for dispersion in flow through a tube with stagnant pockets (AlO), and for flow with a pulsating velocity (A12). Hawthorn (H7) considered the temperature effect of viscosity on dispersion coefficients he found that they can be altered by a factor of two in laminar flow, but that there is little effect for fully developed turbulent flow. Elder (E4) has considered open-channel flow and diffusion of discrete particles. Bischoff and Levenspiel (B14) extended Aris s theory to include a linear rate process, and used the results to construct comprehensive correlations of dispersion coefficients. 

In fact, the plug-flow approximation is even better than this calculation indicates because of radial mixing, which wiU occur in a laminar-flow reactor. A fluid molecule near the wall will flow with nearly zero velocity and have an infinite residence time, while a molecule near the center will flow with velocity 2u. However, the molecule near the wall will diffuse toward the center of the tube, and the molecule near the center will diffuse toward the wall, as shown in Figure 8-7. Thus the tail on the RTD will be smaller, and the spike at t/2 will be broadened. We will consider diffusion effects in the axial direction in the next section. 

The first termination step occurs homogeneously, while the second occurs by adsorption of R on the walls of the reactor. Formulate an expression for the rate of this reaction expected in a tube of diameter D with laminar flow (Shp = 8/3) and a diffusion coefficient Dr. What effective rate expressions are obtained in the limits of when... 

Figure 3.3. Various features of diffusion and convection associated with crystal growth in solution (a) in a beaker and (b) around a crystal. The crystal is denoted by the shaded area. Shown are the diffusion boundary layer (db) the bulk diffusion (D) the convection due to thermal or gravity difference (T) Marangoni convection (M) buoyancy-driven convection (B) laminar flow, turbulent flow (F) Berg effect (be) smooth interface (S) rough interface (R) growth unit (g). The attachment and detachment of the solute (solid line) and the solvent (open line) are illustrated in (b).

The large fluctuations in temperature and composition likely to be encountered in turbulence (B6) opens the possibility that the influence of these coupling effects may be even more pronounced than under the steady conditions rather close to equilibrium where Eq. (56) is strictly applicable. For this reason there exists the possibility that outside the laminar boundary layer the mutual interaction of material and thermal transfer upon the over-all transport behavior may be somewhat different from that indicated in Eq. (56). The foregoing thoughts are primarily suppositions but appear to be supported by some as yet unpublished experimental work on thermal diffusion in turbulent flow. Jeener and Thomaes (J3) have recently made some measurements on thermal diffusion in liquids. Drickamer and co-workers (G2, R4, R5, T2) studied such behavior in gases and in the critical region. 

We shall look at the boundary conditions for this equation in the next section. I want to mention here a very important model introduced by Wes-terterp and his collaborators4 and to do so will revert to the classical form of the Taylor problem, in which there is no reaction, the tube is circular (radius R), and the flow is laminar (average velocity U). Also, we ignore the effect of molecular diffusion in the longitudinal direction and are concerned only with the effects of the lateral diffusion across the flow profile. Thus, we have... 

Mass transport in laminar flow is dominated by diffusion and by the laminar velocity profile. This combined effect is known as dispersion and the underlying model for the theoretical derivation of a kinetic study had to be derived from the dispersion model, which Taylor [91] and Aris [92] developed. Taylor concluded that in laminar flow the speed of an inert tracer impulse initially given to a channel will have the same speed as the steady laminar carrier gas flow originally prevailing in this channel. 

In macroscopic reactors, knowledge of the velocity profile in the channel cross-section is a necessary and sufficient prerequisite to describe the material transport. In microscopic dimensions down to a few micrometers, diffusion also has to be considered. In fact, without the influence of diffusion, extremely broad residence time distributions would be found because of the laminar flow conditions. Superposition of convection and diffusion is called dispersion. Taylor [91] was among the first to notice this strong dominating effect in laminar flow. It is possible to transfer his deduction to rectangular channels. A complete fluid dynamic description has been given of the flow, including effects such as the influence of the wall, the aspect ratio and a chemical wall reaction on the concentration field in the cross-section [37]. 

---