Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Diffusion coefficient sphere

Reference 115 gives the diffusion coefficient of DTAB (dodecyltrimethylammo-nium bromide) as 1.07 x 10" cm /sec. Estimate the micelle radius (use the Einstein equation relating diffusion coefficient and friction factor and the Stokes equation for the friction factor of a sphere) and compare with the value given in the reference. Estimate also the number of monomer units in the micelle. Assume 25°C. [Pg.490]

We call the correlation time it is equal to 1/6 Dj, where Dj is the rotational diffusion coefficient. The correlation time increases with increasing molecular size and with increasing solvent viscosity, equation Bl.13.11 and equation B 1.13.12 describe the rotational Brownian motion of a rigid sphere in a continuous and isotropic medium. With the Lorentzian spectral densities of equation B 1.13.12. it is simple to calculate the relevant transition probabilities. In this way, we can use e.g. equation B 1.13.5 to obtain for a carbon-13... [Pg.1504]

Since the diffusion coefficient is constant for a given material, Eq. (2.63) shows that the time required for a displacement increases with the square of the distance traveled. This can be understood by thinking that the displacement criterion would be met by finding the diffused particle anywhere on the surface of a sphere of radius x after time t if it started at the origin. The surface area of a sphere is proportional to the square of its radius. [Pg.121]

Consider spherical molecules A and B having radii and Tb and diffusion coefficients Da and Db- First, suppose that B is fixed and that the rate of reaction is limited by the rate at which A molecules diffuse to the B molecule. We calculate the flux 7(A- B) of A molecules to one B molecule. Let a and b be the concentrations (in molecules/cm ) of A and B in the bulk, and let r be the radius of a sphere centered at the B molecule. The surface area of this sphere is Aitr, so by Pick s first law we obtain... [Pg.134]

This equation is identical to the Maxwell [236,237] solution originally derived for electrical conductivity in a dilute suspension of spheres. Hashin and Shtrikman [149] using variational theory showed that Maxwell s equation is in fact an upper bound for the relative diffusion coefficients in isotropic medium for any concentration of suspended spheres and even for cases where the solid portions of the medium are not spheres. However, they also noted that a reduced upper bound may be obtained if one includes additional statistical descriptions of the medium other than the void fraction. Weissberg [419] demonstrated that this was indeed true when additional geometrical parameters are included in the calculations. Batchelor and O Brien [34] further extended the Maxwell approach. [Pg.572]

Lord Rayleigh [310] modeled transport in a homogeneous suspension of spheres placed in a square lattice. In terms of diffusion coefficients, his solution was... [Pg.574]

Subsequent work by Johansson and Lofroth [183] compared this result with those obtained from Brownian dynamics simulation of hard-sphere diffusion in polymer networks of wormlike chains. They concluded that their theory gave excellent agreement for small particles. For larger particles, the theory predicted a faster diffusion than was observed. They have also compared the diffusion coefficients from Eq. (73) to the experimental values [182] for diffusion of poly(ethylene glycol) in k-carrageenan gels and solutions. It was found that their theory can successfully predict the diffusion of solutes in both flexible and stiff polymer systems. Equation (73) is an example of the so-called stretched exponential function discussed further later. [Pg.579]

Three types of methods are used to study solvation in molecular solvents. These are primarily the methods commonly used in studying the structures of molecules. However, optical spectroscopy (IR and Raman) yields results that are difficult to interpret from the point of view of solvation and are thus not often used to measure solvation numbers. NMR is more successful, as the chemical shifts are chiefly affected by solvation. Measurement of solvation-dependent kinetic quantities is often used (<electrolytic mobility, diffusion coefficients, etc). These methods supply data on the region in the immediate vicinity of the ion, i.e. the primary solvation sphere, closely connected to the ion and moving together with it. By means of the third type of methods some static quantities entropy and compressibility as well as some non-thermodynamic quantities such as the dielectric constant) are measured. These methods also pertain to the secondary solvation-sphere, in which the solvent structure is affected by the presence of ions, but the... [Pg.32]

In the general case, the initial concentration of the oxidized component equals Cqx and that of the reduced component cRed. If the appropriate differential equations are used for transport of the two electroactive forms (see Eqs 2.5.3 and 2.7.16) with the corresponding diffusion coefficients, then the relationship between the concentrations of the oxidized and reduced forms at the surface of the electrode (for linear diffusion and simplified convective diffusion to a growing sphere) is given in the form... [Pg.292]

A sphere is assumed to be a poorly soluble solute particle and therefore to have a constant radius rQ. However, the solid solute quickly dissolves, so the concentration on the surface of the sphere is equal to its solubility. Also, we assume we have a large volume of dissolution medium so that the bulk concentration is very low compared to the solubility (sink condition). The diffusion equation for a constant diffusion coefficient in a spherical coordinate system is... [Pg.64]

Numerous models have been proposed to interpret pore diffusion through polymer networks. The most successful and most widely used model has been that of Yasuda and coworkers [191,192], This theory has its roots in the free volume theory of Cohen and Turnbull [193] for the diffusion of hard spheres in a liquid. According to Yasuda and coworkers, the diffusion coefficient is proportional to exp(-Vj/Vf), where Vs is the characteristic volume of the solute and Vf is the free volume within the gel. Since Vf is assumed to be linearly related to the volume fraction of solvent inside the gel, the following expression is derived ... [Pg.536]

If the considered molecule cannot be assimilated to a sphere, one has to take into account a rotational diffusion tensor, the principal axes of which coincide, to a first approximation, with the principal axes of the molecular inertial tensor. In that case, three different rotational diffusion coefficients are needed.14 They will be denoted as Dx, Dy, Dz and describe the reorientation about the principal axes of the rotational diffusion tensor. They lead to unwieldy expressions even for auto-correlation spectral densities, which can be somewhat simplified if the considered interaction can be approximated by a tensor of axial symmetry, allowing us to define two polar angles 6 and

symmetry axis of the considered interaction) in the (X, Y, Z) molecular frame (see Figure 5). As the tensor associated with dipolar interactions is necessarily of axial symmetry (the relaxation vector being... [Pg.103]

The diffusion coefficients of this system were determined for disordered micelles and bcc spheres [47]. They were found to be retarded as compared to the disordered state. This retardation is consistent with a hindered diffusion process, D Do exp(- AxN ), with D0 being the diffusion coefficient in the absence of any interactions (i.e. for y -> 0), and A is a prefactor of order unity. Hence, the diffusion barrier increases with the enthalpic penalty xNa, where N represents the number of monomers in the foreign block. In the simplest description of hindered diffusion, the prefactor A remains constant. This model describes the experimental data poorly as A was found to increase with xNa [47]. [Pg.151]

Several important assumptions have been implicitly incorporated in Eqs. (15) and (16). First, these equations describe the release of a drug from a carrier of a thin planar geometry, equivalent equations for release from thick slabs, cylinders, and spheres have been derived (Crank and Park, 1968). It should also be emphasized that in the above written form of Fick s law, the diffusion coefficient is assumed to be independent of concentration. This assumption, while not conceptually correct, has been... [Pg.84]

Outer sphere relaxation arises from the dipolar intermolecular interaction between the water proton nuclear spins and the gadolinium electron spin whose fluctuations are governed by random translational motion of the molecules (106). The outer sphere relaxation rate depends on several parameters, such as the closest approach of the solvent water protons and the Gdm complex, their relative diffusion coefficient, and the electron spin relaxation rate (107-109). Freed and others (110-112) developed an analytical expression for the outer sphere longitudinal relaxation rate, (l/Ti)os, for the simplest case of a force-free model. The force-free model is only a rough approximation for the interaction of outer sphere water molecules with Gdm complexes. [Pg.89]

The diffusion coefficient is estimated using Stokes law, D = kTjQmrja, where rj is the viscosity and a the radius of the rotating sphere. This rough model allows a calculation of the correlation function. It turns out that a Boltzmann distribution remains a Boltzmann distribution so that the system of equations (12)... [Pg.294]

Let us assume that a sphere with radius a is immersed in a liquid of finite volume, e.g., a mineral in a hydrothermal fluid. Diffusion in liquids is normally fast compared to diffusion in solids, so that the liquid can be thought of as homogeneous. Similar conditions would apply to a sphere degassing into a finite enclosure, e.g., for radiogenic argon loss in a closed pore space. Given the diffusion equation with radial flux and constant diffusion coefficient... [Pg.449]

States Hard-Sphere Model for the Diffusion-Coefficients of Binary Dense-Plasma Mixtures. [Pg.158]

There are not a great number of studies on the viscoelastic behaviour of quasi-hard spheres. The studies of Mellema and coworkers13 shown in Figure 5.5 indicate the real and imaginary parts of the viscosity in a high-frequency oscillation experiment. Their data can be normalised to a characteristic time based on the diffusion coefficient given above. [Pg.158]

These experiments suggest that as the long time self-diffusion coefficient approaches zero the relaxation time becomes infinite, suggesting an elastic structure. In an important study of the diffusion coefficients for a wide range of concentrations, Ottewill and Williams14 showed that it does indeed reduce toward zero as the hard sphere transition is approached. This is shown in Figure 5.6, where the ratio of the long time diffusion coefficient to the diffusion coefficient in the dilute limit is plotted as a function of concentration. [Pg.158]

Figure 5.6 The quasi-hard sphere diffusion data of Ottewill and Williams14 as a function of volume fraction. The long (DL) and short (Ds) time tracer diffusion coefficients are shown (symbols). The dotted line is representative of the relative fluidity of a hard sphere dispersion... Figure 5.6 The quasi-hard sphere diffusion data of Ottewill and Williams14 as a function of volume fraction. The long (DL) and short (Ds) time tracer diffusion coefficients are shown (symbols). The dotted line is representative of the relative fluidity of a hard sphere dispersion...
Einstein s work on the diffusion of particles (1906) led to the well known Stokes-Einstein relation giving the diffusion coefficient D of a sphere ... [Pg.226]

The term in the square bracket is an effective diffusion coefficient DAB. In principle, this may be used together with a material balance to predict changes in concentration within a pellet. Algebraic solutions are more easily obtained when the effective diffusivity is constant. The conservation of counter-ions diffusing into a sphere may be expressed in terms of resin phase concentration Csr, which is a function of radius and time. [Pg.1061]


See other pages where Diffusion coefficient sphere is mentioned: [Pg.370]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.2668]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.608]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.853]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.19]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.184 ]




SEARCH



Sphere Brownian diffusion coefficients

© 2024 chempedia.info