Diffusion barrier, definition

By definition, the rate at which the tracer atom is displaced by a surface vacancy is the product of the vacancy density at the site next to the tracer times the rate at which vacancies exchange with the tracer atom. For the case where the interaction between the tracer atom and the vacancy is negligible, the activation energy obtained from the temperature dependence of the total displacement rate equals the sum of the vacancy formation energy EF and the vacancy diffusion barrier ED. When the measurements are performed with finite temporal resolution and if there is an interaction present between the vacancy and the indium atom, this simple picture changes. 

The fields marked Fe203 and Fe304 are sometimes labeled passivation on the assumption that iron reacts in these regions to form protective oxide films. This is correct only insofar as passivity is accounted for by a diffusion-barrier oxide layer (Definition 2, Section 6.1). Actually, the Flade potential, above which passivity of iron is observed in media such as sulfuric or nitric acid, parallels line a and b, intersecting 0.6 V at pH = 0. For this reason, the passive film (Definition 1, Section 6.1) may not be any of the equilibrium stoichiometric iron oxides, as is further discussed in Chapter 6. 

There are two commonly expressed points of view regarding the composition and structure of the passive film. The first holds that the passive film (Definition 1 or 2) is always a diffusion-barrier layer of reaction products—for example, metal oxide or other compound that separates metal from its environment and that decreases the reaction rate. This theory is sometimes referred to as the oxide-film theory. 

There is no question on either viewpoint that a diffusion-barrier film is the basis of passivity of many metals that are passive only by Definition 2. Examples of protective films that isolate the metal from its environment are (a) a visible lead sulfate film on lead immersed in H2SO4 and (b) an iron fluoride film on steel immersed in aqueous HF. 

An inhibiting mechanism similar to that for nontransition metals in contact with passivators probably also applies to steel in concentrated refrigerating brines (NaCl or CaCy to which chromates are added as inhibitors (approximately 1.5-3. Og Na2Cr207/liter adjusted with NaOH to form CrOi ). In the presence of so large a Cr concentration, passivity of the kind discussed under Definition 1 (Section 6.1) does not take place. The reduction in corrosion rate is not as pronounced as when chlorides are absent [14] (see Table 17.1), and any reduction that occurs apparently results from formation of a surface diffusion barrier of chromate reduction products and iron oxides. Chromates are not adequate inhibitors for the hot concentrated brine solutions that, in the past, were sometimes mistakenly proposed as antifreeze solutions for engine cooling systems. 

The geometrical definition of the wound part is primarily done by the mandrel, which has to be removed from the part after consolidation of the composite material. In terms of tubes or cones with no undercut, this removal is relatively easily performed using a mandrel-extractor. The mandrel can then be reused. Mandrels of other geometries such as that required for vessels cannot be removed mechanically and have to stay inside the part. They are called expendable mandrels and may be of additional service for corrosion protection or as a diffusion barrier. Collapsible mandrels can be apphed for large part diameters with undercuts [28,31]. 

NO2 SCR compositions, superior NOx conversion performance was achieved with the layered architecture. The schematic shown in Fig. 11.17 explains the concept while Fig. 11.18 provides typical data for several monolith samples. The catalyst design and operating strategy was to exploit differences in the intrinsic activity and selectivity of the two catalysts through coupled reaction and diffusion. At low temperature the top layer should behave in the limit as simply as a diffusion barrier, whereas at high temperature the top layer should be sufficiently active so as to confine most of the conversion in that layer. This was of definite benefit because at low temperature, the Fe layer was much less active than the underlying Cu layer which was selective for N2, while at high temperature reaction occurred in the more selective Fe top layer. 

A fundamental difference exists between the assumptions of the homogeneous and porous membrane models. For the homogeneous models, it is assumed that the membrane is nonporous, that is, transport takes place between the interstitial spaces of the polymer chains or polymer nodules, usually by diffusion. For the porous models, it is assumed that transport takes place through pores that mn the length of the membrane barrier layer. As a result, transport can occur by both diffusion and convection through the pores. Whereas both conceptual models have had some success in predicting RO separations, the question of whether an RO membrane is truly homogeneous, ie, has no pores, or is porous, is still a point of debate. No available technique can definitively answer this question. Two models, one nonporous and diffusion-based, the other pore-based, are discussed herein. 

In order to obtain a definite breakthrough of current across an electrode, a potential in excess of its equilibrium potential must be applied any such excess potential is called an overpotential. If it concerns an ideal polarizable electrode, i.e., an electrode whose surface acts as an ideal catalyst in the electrolytic process, then the overpotential can be considered merely as a diffusion overpotential (nD) and yields (cf., Section 3.1) a real diffusion current. Often, however, the electrode surface is not ideal, which means that the purely chemical reaction concerned has a free enthalpy barrier especially at low current density, where the ion diffusion control of the electrolytic conversion becomes less pronounced, the thermal activation energy (AG°) plays an appreciable role, so that, once the activated complex is reached at the maximum of the enthalpy barrier, only a fraction a (the transfer coefficient) of the electrical energy difference nF(E ml - E ) = nFtjt is used for conversion. 

An operational definition of thin-layer electrochemistry is that area of electrochemical endeavor in which special advantage is taken of restricting the diffii-sional field of electroactive species and products. Typically, the solution under study is confined to a well-defined layer, less than 0.2 mm thick, trapped between an electrode and an inert barrier, between two electrodes, or between two inert barriers with an electrode between. Diffusion under this restricted condition has been described in Chapter 2 (Sec. II.C). Solution trapped in a porous-bed electrode will have qualitatively similar electrochemical properties however, geometric complexities make this configuration less useful for analytical purposes. The variety of electrical excitation signals applicable to thin-layer electrochemical work is large. Three reviews of the subject have appeared [28-30]. 

Iontophoresis by definition is the process of transport of ions into or through a tissue by the use of an applied potential difference across the tissue [52], Depending on the physicochemical characteristics of a molecular species, electrorepulsion is usually the primary mechanism of transdermal transport for ions, whereas electroosmosis and increased passive diffusion (as a result of the reduced barrier properties) are more prominent for neutral species [53]. In contrast, enhancement in flux for neutral or weakly charged species during electroporation arises predominantly from the reduced barrier properties of the membrane, whereas direct electrorepulsion is usually of secondary importance [25],... 

In the first and second equation, E is the energy of activation. In the first equation A is the so-called frequency factor. In the second equation AS is the entropy of activation, the interatomic distance between diffusion sites, k Boltzmann s constant, and h Planck s constant. In the second equation the frequency factor A is expressed by means of the universal constants X2 and the temperature independent factor eAS /R. For our purposes AS determines which fraction of ions or atoms with a definite energy pass over the energy barrier for reaction. 

It is evident that, in the cases of single-file diffusion and barrier-limited molecular exchange, a suitable definition of the Thiele modulus cannot be based on eq. 1. These cases may also be covered, however, if the Thiele modulus is expressed in terms of the... 

The conditions are such that the particle is originally in a potential hole, but it may escape in the course of time by passing over a potential barrier. The analytical problem is to calculate the escape probability as a function of the temperature and of the viscosity of the medium, and then to compare the values so found with the ones of the activated state method. For sake of simplicity, Kramers studied only the one-dimensional model, and the calculation rests on the equation of diffusion obeyed by a density distribution of particles in the. phase space. Definite results can be obtained in the limiting cases of small and large viscosity, and in both cases there is a close analogy with the Cristiansen treatment of chemical reactions as a diffusion problem. When the potential barrier corresponds to a rather smooth maximum, a reliable solution is obtained for any value of the viscosity, and, within a large range of values of the viscosity, the escape probability happens to be practically equal to that computed by the activated state method. 

---