Diffraction pattern of an amorphous

In amorphous solids there is a considerable disorder and it is impossible to give a description of their structure comparable to that applicable to crystals. In a crystal indeed the identification of all the atoms in the unit cell, at least in principle, is possible with a precise determination of their coordinates. For a glass, only a statistical description may be obtained to this end different experimental techniques are useful and often complementary to each other. Especially important are the methods based on diffraction experiments only these will be briefly mentioned here. The diffraction pattern of an amorphous alloy does not show sharp diffraction peaks as for crystalline materials but only a few broadened peaks. Much more limited information can thus be extracted and only a statistical description of the structure may be obtained. The so-called radial distribution function is defined as ... 

Amorphous materials have no long-range crystalline order but since they maintain a molecular structure they still give a vibrational spectrum which may be distinct from the crystalline material. In comparison, the X-ray powder diffraction pattern of an amorphous material contains only a broad signal which yields no structural information. 

As mentioned above, the diffraction pattern of an amorphous solid shows... 

Fig. 11—Observation of subsurface damage, (a) Cross section HTEM images of surface undergoing collision for ten minutes, (b) Electron diffraction pattern from an amorphous area.

Thus, a certain fraction of amorphous material is associated with the crystalline material and the resulting diffraction pattern is the sum of an ordinary pattern with Bragg peaks and a continuous pattern with one or more broad maxima. To illustrate this, x-ray diffraction patterns of some amorphous polymers are given in Fig. 5. The size of the amorphous fraction relative to the crystalline fraction (amorphous to crystalline ratio) does influence the overall spectrum considerably (Fig. 6). 

Since the X-ray diffraction pattern of every crystalline form of a compound is imique, the technique is widely used for the identification and characterization of solid phases. XRD is the technique of choice to identify different polymorphic forms of a compound (Fig. 1). It can also be used to identify the solvated and unsolvated (anhydrous) forms of a compound, provided their lattice structures are different. The technique can also reveal differences in the crystallinity of compounds. The XRD pattern of an amorphous (noncrystalline) compound will consist of one or more broad diffuse halos (Fig. 2A). ... 

I iR. 2.7. X-ray diffraction patterns of an initially crystalline Zr,Rh sample (asquenchcd), which was hydrided during a 4f> h period. The data show the transformation into the amorphous phase... 

Figure 6 (a) P-E hysteresis loop of an amorphous LiNbOs film coated on a gold-plated silicon wafer with a platinum top electrode (at 60 Hz scale x axis 147 kV/cm division, and y axis, 5.6 pC/cm2 division, (b) Electron diffraction pattern of the amorphous LiNbOs film the diffuse ring indicated the amorphous nature of the film. 

Figure 3 shows a bright-field electron micrograph and a selected-area diffraction pattern of an Al5oGe4oMnio amorphous alloy annealed for 10 min at 520 K with an internal energy lower by about 1.8kJ/mol as compared with the as-quenched amorphous phase. 

Fig. 6. TEM-picture and diffraction pattern of an originally crystalline Zr Rh compound in its amorphous state after SSR with hydrogen.

This mechanism is also confirmed by X-ray diffraction measurements [94, 100]. It is also mentioned that the absence of reflexes belonging to Li3NbC>4, in X-ray diffraction patterns obtained for mixtures treated at relatively low temperatures, could be explained by the formation of an amorphous material at the very beginning of the process [103]. 

Figure 8. Image and diffraction pattern from an (100) epitaxial. specimen of gold prepared in an unbaked UHV evaporator by depo.sition onto KOI and then transfer onto amorphous carbon. Here water vapour was the dominant residual gas (determined by mass spectrometry). The particles are square pyramidal single crystals.

Figure 41.4 shows a typical XRD (X-Ray Diffraction) pattern of TUD-1, along with a TEM image (12). Similar to other mesoporous materials, TUD-1 has a broad peak at low 20. However, it has a broad background peak, commonly called an amorphous halo, and lacks any secondary peaks that are evident for example in the hexagonal MCM-41 and cubic MCM-48 structures. The TEM shows that the pores have no apparent periodicity. In this example the pore diameter is about 5 nm. 

Samples of the poly(dialkylphosphazenes) 1 and 2 displayed X-ray powder diffraction patterns characteristic of crystalline regions in the materials. The peaks in the diffraction pattern of 1 were of lower amplitude and greater angular breadth than those of 2. These data indicate that poly(diethylphosphazene) (2) is highly crystalline while poly(dimethyl-phosphazene) (1) is more amorphous with smaller crystalline zones. This high degree of crystallinity is probably responsible for the insolubility of 2 as noted above. All of the phenyl substituted polymers 3-6 were found to be quite amorphous in the X-ray diffraction studies, a result that is further evidence for an atactic structure of the poly(alkylphenylphosphazenes) 3 and 4 and for a random substitution pattern in the copolymers 5 and 6. 

There is actually no sharp distinction between the crystalline and amorphous states. Each sample of a pharmaceutical solid or other organic material exhibits an X-ray diffraction pattern of a certain sharpness or diffuseness corresponding to a certain mosaic spread, a certain content of crystal defects, and a certain degree of crystallinity. When comparing the X-ray diffuseness or mosaic spread of finely divided (powdered) solids, the particle size should exceed 1 um or should be held constant. The reason is that the X-ray diffuseness increases with decreasing particle size below about 0.1 J,m until the limit of molecular dimension is reached at 1-0.1 nm (10-1 A), when the concept of the crystal with regular repetition of the unit cell ceases to be appropriate. 

In the disc method, the powder is compressed by a punch in a die to produce a compacted disc, or tablet. The disc, with one face exposed, is then rotated at a constant speed without wobble in the dissolution medium. For this purpose the disc may be placed in a holder, such as the Wood et al. [Ill] apparatus, or may be left in the die [112]. The dissolution rate, dmldt, is determined as in a batch method, while the wetted surface area is simply the area of the disc exposed to the dissolution medium. The powder x-ray diffraction patterns of the solid after compaction and of the residual solid after dissolution should be compared with that of the original powder to test for possible phase changes during compaction or dissolution. Such phase changes would include polymorphism, solvate formation, or crystallization of an amorphous solid [113],... 

The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and correlated electron diffraction patterns of quenched QAB2-4 alloy is shown in Figure 2. When annealed at 773K, by selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns at transmission electron microscopy appears as a bright continuous ring, indicating an amorphous phase. 

The x-ray powder diffraction patterns of bmimCl Crystal (1) and (2) are shown in Fig. 3 [8]. The sharp peaks with distinct patterns indicate that they are different crystals and that neither of them is an amorphous solid. The continuous background notable for Crystal (2) is most likely to arise from the structural disorder existing in the crystal. The x-ray powder diffraction pattern of bmimBr is also shown in Fig. 3 for comparison. The pattern of bmimBr is more close to that of bmimCl Crystal (2) than to Crystal (1). 

The problem with limited selectivity includes some of the minerals which are problems for XRD illite, muscovite, smectites and mixed-layer clays. Poor crystallinity creates problems with both XRD and FTIR. The IR spectrum of an amorphous material lacks sharp distinguishing features but retains spectral intensity in the regions typical of its composition. The X-ray diffraction pattern shows low intensity relative to well-defined crystalline structures. The major problem for IR is selectivity for XRD it is sensitivity. In an interlaboratory FTIR comparison (7), two laboratories gave similar results for kaolinite, calcite, and illite, but substantially different results for montmorillonite and quartz. 

In diffraction patterns made from unoriented samples, the crystalline pattern is superimposed on an amorphous halo. As shown in Fig. 5, the percentage of amorphous material may be calculated by comparing the intensities of the two portions of the diffraction pattern. When the amorphous fraction is large, as in samples which have been quenched rapidly from the melt to a low temperature, the crystal structure may be greatly disrupted. Various interpretations of the intermolecular and intramolecular order which may be deduced from the diffraction patterns of such samples are discussed by Kilian and Jenckel. 

The low intensity of the x-ray lines found in the diffraction pattern of the terpolymer compared with the high intensity observed for PE signified that the level of crystallinity in the former was significantly below that of PE. In spite of this, an amorphous sample could not be prepared by quenching. The presence of crystalline regions was indicated in many mixtures, but crystallinity decreased markedly as the weight fraction of the terpolymer decreased. 

---