Diesel fuel particulates emission

When biodiesel is blended with diesel fuel, the emissions results change somewhat. A significant decrease in hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions is typical, no change or a small increase in oxides of nitrogen emissions, and significant reduction in particulate emissions. Emissions of toxins would also decrease according to the percentage substitution of diesel fuel. 

For other physical properties, the specification differences between diesel fuel and home-heating oil are minimal. Note only that there is no minimum distillation end point for heating oil, undoubtedly because tbe problem of particulate emissions is much less critical in domestic burners than in an engine. 

The main justification for diesel fuel desulfurization is related to particulate emissions which are subject to very strict rules. Part of the sulfur is transformed first into SO3, then into hydrated sulfuric acid on the filter designed to collect the particulates. Figure 5.21 gives an estimate of the variation of the particulate weights as a function of sulfur content of diesel fuel for heavy vehicles. The effect is greater when the test cycle contains more high temperature operating phases which favor the transformation of SO2 to SO3. This is particularly noticeable in the standard cycle used in Europe (ECE R49). 

Desulfurization will become mandatory when oxidizing catalysts are installed on the exhaust systems of diesel engines. At high temperatures this catalyst accelerates the oxidation of SO2 to SO3 and causes an increase in the weight of particulate emissions if the diesel fuel has not been desulfurized. As an illustrative example, Figure 5.22 shows that starting from a catalyst temperature of 400°C, the quantity of particulates increases very rapidly with the sulfur content. 

Influence of the sulfur content in diesel fuel on particulate emissions as a, function of the catalytic converter inlet temperature. 

Influence of hydrotreating a diesel fuel on particulate emissions. 

Diesel fuels, like gasoline, are formulated with additives that affect the process of combustion, in this case to improve the cetane number. Diesel fuels also contain detergents for irijection systems as well as compounds for improving the fuel s low tempierature rheology. Finally, decreasing particulate emissions is a problem of increasing concern, but the mechanism of action to promote this effect is not clearly understood. 

These catalysts contained promoters to minimise SO2 oxidation. Second-generation systems are based on a combined oxidation catalyst and particulate trap to remove HC and CO, and to alleviate particulate emissions on a continuous basis. The next phase will be the development of advanced catalysts for NO removal under oxidising conditions. Low or 2ero sulfur diesel fuel will be an advantage in overall system development. 

Effective with the 1982 model year, particulate matter from diesel vehicles was regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for the first time, at a level of 0.37 gm km . Diesel vehicles were allowed to meet an NO level of 0.93 gm km under an Environmental Protection Agency waiver. These standards were met by a combination of control systems, primarily exhaust gas recirculation and improvements in the combustion process. For the 1985 model year, the standards decreased to 0.12 gm of particulate matter per kilometer and 0.62 gm of NO per kilometer. This required the use of much more extensive control systems (1). The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (2) have kept the emission standards at the 1985 model level with one exception diesel-fueled heavy trucks shall be required to meet an NO standard of 4.0 gm per brake horsepower hour. 

In addition to greenhouse benefits, biodiesels offer environmental advantages over conventional diesel. Biodiesels produce similar NO, emissions to conventional diesel, fuel but less particulate matter. Biodiesel is more biodegradable that conventional diesel making any spills less damaging in sensitive areas. In general biodiesel provides more lubrication to the fuel system than low-sulfur diesel. 

Most urban rail service is electric-powered and most urban bus service is diesel-powered, although diesel rail and electric bus operations do exist, as noted above. The efficiency and environmental impacts of electricity depend gi eatly on the source of electric power. Although electric vehicles produce no tailpipe emissions, generation of electricity can produce significant emissions that can travel long distances, Eor example, coal-powered electricity plants produce particulate emissions that travel halfway across North America, Urban buses also can be powered by a variety of alternative fuels. 

Many GTL-derived fuels are being considered for blending with gasoline and diesel to achieve emission reductions of particulate matter (PM), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen compounds (NOx) and nonmethane hydrocarbons (NMHC). The most promising fuels converted from natural gas are methanol and ethers such as dimethyl ether (DME) and mcthyl-t-bntyl ether (MTBE). 

The fact that Fischer-Tropsch fuels contain neither sulfur nor aromatics may become a strong selling point for the process. Less sulfur in the fuel has, of course, a direct effect on the sulfur oxides in the emissions, and the newly developed exhaust purification systems for lean burning engines that can be introduced means that all emissions, including GO2 and NOx, will diminish. Aromatics promote particulate formation in the combustion of diesel fuels and are therefore undesirable. We discuss this further in Ghapter 10. 

On the other hand, biodiesel is a good additive to diesel fuel, reducing smoke, particulate matter (PM) and CO emissions. Engines using E-diesel with 10%... 

In the United States and other parts of the world, both low-sulfur diesel fuel and high-sulfur diesel fuel are being refined. Because fuel sulfur level has been identified as the primary component of fuel emission particulates and acid rain, sulfur reduction has been mandated and implemented. 

Diesel-water emulsions are being studied extensively worldwide because of the impact these fuels have on reducing engine exhaust emissions, especially NOx and particulates. Although formulations vary, a typical diesel-water emulsion will contain approximately 80% to 90% diesel fuel, 10% to 15% water, and 1% to 5% of an emulsification additive mixture. The resulting fuel blend is transparent in appearance and has the typical appearance of diesel fuel. 

---