Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Determination of interaction parameters

Peppas N, Merrill E. Determination of interaction parameter for poly(vinyl alcohol) in gels crosslinked from solution. Journal of Polymer Science 1976, 14, 459 464. [Pg.238]

As discussed in Chapter 2 of this Handbook, the osmotic pressure can provide one of the most direct methods of determination of interaction parameter. The estimation of these interaction parameters is applied to PS/PVME blends in toluene and ethyl benzene respectively [Shiomi et al., 1985]. It is observed that in toluene varied with composition from -0.044 to h-0.0093, while in ethyl benzene it increased with PVME content from -0.06 to 0.027. [Pg.897]

Manoli, K. Goustouridas, D. Raptis, J. Valamontes, E. Sanopoulou, M., Vapor-Induced Swelling of Supported Methacrylic and Siloxane Polymer Films Determination of Interaction Parameters. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010,116, 184-190. [Pg.207]

PET Petri, H.-M., Horst, R., and Wolf, B.A., Determination of interaction parameters for highly incompatible polymers. Polymer, 37, 2709, 1996. [Pg.735]

The miscibility of polymer blends can be predicted experimentally by using several techniques, including electron microscopy and time-resolved light scattering. Other techniques, such as small-angle neutron scattering, ellipsometry and NR allow the determination of interaction parameters in both miscible and immiscible systems. [Pg.305]

Second, using the fully relativistic version of the TB-LMTO-CPA method within the atomic sphere approximation (ASA) we have calculated the total energies for random alloys AiBi i at five concentrations, x — 0,0.25,0.5,0.75 and 1, and using the CW method modified for disordered alloys we have determined five interaction parameters Eq, D,V,T, and Q as before (superscript RA). Finally, the electronic structure of random alloys calculated by the TB-LMTO-CPA method served as an input of the GPM from which the pair interactions v(c) (superscript GPM) were determined. In order to eliminate the charge transfer effects in these calculations, the atomic radii were adjusted in such a way that atoms were charge neutral while preserving the total volume of the alloy. The quantity (c) used for comparisons is a sum of properly... [Pg.41]

Apart from the determination of nuclear parameters, the Mossbauer transition in Os, especially the 36.2 and 69.6 keV transitions, are suited for chemical applications. As shown below, the 36.2 keV level, in spite of its large half-width, can be well used for the measurement of isomer shifts, whereas the 69.2 keV state is favorable for the characterization of electric quadrupole or magnetic dipole interactions. Both Mossbauer levels are populated equally well by the parent isotope lr, and simultaneous measurement is possible by appropriate geometrical arrangement. [Pg.311]

It is well known that cubic equations of state have inherent limitations in describing accurately the fluid phase behavior. Thus our objective is often restricted to the determination of a set of interaction parameters that will yield an "acceptable fit" of the binary VLE data. The following implicit least squares objective function is suitable for this purpose... [Pg.236]

The first task of the estimation procedure is to quickly and efficiently screen all possible sets of interaction parameters that could be used. For example if the Trebble-Bishnoi EoS were to be employed which can utilize up to four binary interaction parameters, the number of possible combinations that should be examined is 15. The implicit LS estimation procedure provides the most efficient means to determine the best set of interaction parameters. The best set is the one that results in the smallest value of the LS objective function after convergence of the minimization algorithm has been achieved. One should not readily accept a set that... [Pg.242]

It is assumed that there are available NCP experimental binary critical point data. These data include values of the pressure, Pc, the temperature, Tc, and the mole fraction, xc, of one of the components at each of the critical points for the binary mixture. The vector k of interaction parameters is determined by fitting the EoS to the critical data. In explicit formulations the interaction parameters are obtained by the minimization of the following least squares objective function ... [Pg.261]

Thus, if the saturated vapor pressure is known at the azeotropic composition, the activity coefficient can be calculated. If the composition of the azeotrope is known, then the compositions and activity of the coefficients at the azeotrope can be substituted into the Wilson equation to determine the interaction parameters. For the 2-propanol-water system, the azeotropic composition of 2-propanol can be assumed to be at a mole fraction of 0.69 and temperature of 353.4 K at 1 atm. By combining Equation 4.93 with the Wilson equation for a binary system, set up two simultaneous equations and solve Au and A21. Vapor pressure data can be taken from Table 4.11 and the universal gas constant can be taken to be 8.3145 kJ-kmol 1-K 1. Then, using the values of molar volume in Table 4.12, calculate the interaction parameters for the Wilson equation and compare with the values in Table 4.12. [Pg.75]

The standard deviation between experimental and calculated heats of reaction are between 0.5 and 1 kcal/mol for those classes of compounds where enough experimental heats of formation are available to allow a full parameterization. For those classes of compounds where insufficient heats of formation are known to allow the determination of all parameters for 1,2- and 1,3-interactions, an estimate can be given for the bond energy terms which are the dominating parameters. Even here, therefore, a reasonable value for the reaction enthalpy is available. [Pg.42]

IV. DETERMINATION OF THE PARAMETERS OF INTERACTION FOR MIXTURES. DISCUSSION OF THE COMBINATION RULES... [Pg.131]

Carbon Dioxide - Water System, The data of Wiebe and Gaddy (4, 5, 6) were used exclusively in this study to determine the interaction parameters for the carbon dioxide - water binary system. These data cover the temperature and pressure range from 12°C to 100°C and from 25 atm to 700 atm respectively. As with the HzS - H2O system, a constant interaction parameter has been obtained for the gaseous phase and the carbon dioxide - rich... [Pg.395]

Throughout the editorial stages of the emerging review it was continually necessary to spell out the differences between (a) the use of an ideal solution model, (b) the use of a regular solution model with parameters derived solely from atomic properties and finally (c) the use of interaction parameters derived by feedback from experiment. A proper luiderstanding of the differences between these three approaches lay at the heart of any realistic assessment of the value of calculations in relation to experimentally determined diagrams. [Pg.28]

A major advantage of the expansion of the adsorption energy in terms of l 5s> pair, and multiple-particle interactions is that the adsorption energy depends linearly on the interactions parameters. This means that a determination of these parameters involves only equations of linear algebra. [Pg.144]

In principle, all the molecular parameters in Eq. (6) can be determined independently, so that the theory can be quantitatively compared with experimental data. An example of Maxwell s construction in the dependence of x °n critical value of interaction parameter %c of charged PAAm network with the degree of ionization equals to the molar fraction of the sodium methacrylate in the chain i = xMNa = 0.012 are given in Fig. 4 (data of series D from Fig. 5). The compositions of the phases

critical value of Xc were determined by the condition that areas St and S2 defined in Fig. 4 are equal The experimental (p2e is higher and 2 determined by Maxwell s construction (Eq. 13). Thus, the experimental values of (p2e and metastable region the limits of which (p2s and (p2s are determined by the spinodal condition (two values

[Pg.182]


See other pages where Determination of interaction parameters is mentioned: [Pg.256]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.20]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.121 , Pg.122 , Pg.123 , Pg.124 , Pg.125 , Pg.126 , Pg.127 , Pg.128 , Pg.129 , Pg.130 , Pg.131 , Pg.132 ]




SEARCH



Determination of Ion Interaction Parameters for KOH at Temperatures Other than

Determination of Ion Interaction Parameters from Activity and Osmotic Coefficient Data

Determination of Polymer-Particle Flory-Huggins Interaction Parameters

Development of experimental methods for determining the phase separation region, critical point, spinodal and interaction parameter

Interactive parameters

Parameter determination

© 2024 chempedia.info