Deprotonation Proton transfer

We can extend the general principles of electrophilic addition to acid catalyzed hydration In the first step of the mechanism shown m Figure 6 9 proton transfer to 2 methylpropene forms tert butyl cation This is followed m step 2 by reaction of the car bocation with a molecule of water acting as a nucleophile The aUcyloxomum ion formed m this step is simply the conjugate acid of tert butyl alcohol Deprotonation of the alkyl oxonium ion m step 3 yields the alcohol and regenerates the acid catalyst... 

Chemists have estabhshed that a Dieckmann condensation will not succeed unless the final keto-ester product is deprotonated by a base. In our example, this would be a reaction between EtO" and the keto-ester (it is necessary, therefore, to use excess EtO ). What reaction products are generated by this proton transfer Obtain the energies of the reactants and products, and calculate the energy for this final proton transfer. Is this reaction thermodynamically favorable or unfavorable Does this step make the overall condensation reaction favorable or unfavorable ... 

The mechanism of the indolization of aniline 5 with methylthio-2-propanone 6 is illustrated below. Aniline 5 reacts with f-BuOCl to provide A-chloroaniline 9. This chloroaniline 9 reacts with sulfide 6 to yield azasulfonium salt 10. Deprotonation of the carbon atom adjacent to the sulfur provides the ylide 11. Intramolecular attack of the nucleophilic portion of the ylide 11 in a Sommelet-Hauser type rearrangement produces 12. Proton transfer and re-aromatization leads to 13 after which intramolecular addition of the amine to the carbonyl function generates the carbinolamine 14. Dehydration of 14 by prototropic rearrangement eventually furnishes the indole 8. 

The process for initiating radical formation in aromatic amine-vinyl monomer systems have been studied by Feng et al. [80-86] who proposed the formation of an aminium radical as the active state of an exciplex as intimate ion-pair and then a cyclic transition state which then would undergo a proton transfer process of deprotonation leading to the formation of active radical species for initiation as follows ... 

There are two cases in which the general base catalysis observed for an azo coupling reaction is due not to a rate-limiting proton transfer from the o-complex (Scheme 12-66) but to deprotonation of the coupling component when the species involved in the substitution is formed. These reactions are shown in Schemes 12-71 H I... 

Step 2 Now we use Kal = 6.2 X 10 8 to find the concentration of HP042. Because Ka2 K,, we can safely assume that the H30+ concentration calculated in step 1 is unchanged by the second deprotonation. The proton transfer equilibrium is... 

Write the stepwise proton transfer equilibria for the deprotonation of (a) sulfuric acid, H2S04 (LA arsenic acid, H.As04 (c) phthalic acid. C6H4(COOH)2. 

First, deprotonation of dimethyl phosphite accompanied by coordination of oxygen to the oxophilic lanthanide gives 33. Nucleophilic attack of P on the imine carbon along with N-coordination gives 34 proton transfer followed by product de-complexation regenerates the catalyst [33],... 

Difficulties of a different kind occur for proton transfer equilibria involving doubly charged ions, i.e. doubly deprotonated acids A2 or doubly protonated bases B2H +. For example, proton transfer reactions, involving the doubly protonated base B2H + and a reference base B0,... 

In acid-base catalysis there is at least one step in the reaction mechanism that consists of a generalized acid-base reaction (a proton transfer between the catalyst and the substrate). The protonated or deprotonated reactant species or intermediate then reacts further, either with... 

Concerning the mechanism of O/H insertion, direct carbenoid insertion, oxonium ylide and proton transfer processes have been discussed 7). A recent contribution to this issue is furnished by the Cu(acac)2- or Rh2(OAc)4-catalyzed reaction of benz-hydryl 6-diazopenicillanate 237) with various alcohols, from which 6a-alkoxypenicil-lanates 339 and tetrahydro-l,4-thiazepines 340 resulted324. Formation of 340 is rationalized best by assuming an oxonium ylide intermediate 338 which then rearranges as shown in the formula scheme. Such an assumption is justified by the observation of thiazepine derivatives in reactions which involved deprotonation at C-6 of 6p-aminopenicillanates 325,326). It is possible that the oxonium ylide is the common intermediate for both 339 and 340. 

Fig. 1 Free energy reaction coordinate profiles for hydration and isomerization of the alkene [2] through the simple tertiary carbocation [1+], The rate constants for partitioning of [1 ] to form [l]-OSolv and [3] are limited by solvent reorganization (ks = kteorg) and proton transfer (kp), respectively. For simplicity, the solvent reorganization step is not shown for the conversion of [1+] to [3], but the barrier for this step is smaller than the chemical barrier to deprotonation of [1 ] (kTtOTg > kp).

To what extent are the variations in the rate constant ratio /cs//cpobserved for changing structure of aliphatic and benzylic carbocations the result of changes in the Marcus intrinsic barriers Ap and As for the deprotonation and solvent addition reactions It is not generally known whether there are significant differences in the intrinsic barriers for the nucleophile addition and proton transfer reactions of carbocations. 

There is a 4kcalmol 1 smaller intrinsic barrier As for nucleophilic addition of water to the benzylic carbocations X-[6+] than for deprotonation of X-[6+] by solvent. This difference reflects the greater ease of direct addition of solvent to the charged benzylic carbon of X-[6+] than of proton transfer at the adjacent a-methyl carbon. This may result in some way from the greater number of bonds formed and cleaved in the proton transfer than in the nucleophile addition reaction. However, it is our impression that there is little or no theoretical justification for generalizations of this type. 

Substituent effect on the stability of the transition state for deprotonation (D, Figure 6). The addition of two ortho-methyl groups to Me-[8+] to give Me-[10+] results in an increase in kp for proton transfer to solvent from 1.4 x 106 s 1 to 8.3 x 107 s 1 (Table 1). There should be relatively little steric hindrance to the reaction of solvent with the /1-hydrogens of Me-[10+] because these are relatively distant from the ortho-methyl groups. However, the twisting about the CAr-Ca bond that minimizes steric interactions between the methyl... 

---