Under potential deposition

Different supramoleciflar bi- and tetranuclear Pd(II) and Pt(II) complexes of square- or rhomb-hke shape were deposited under potential control from aqueous electrolyte on a Cu(lOO) electrode surface, which was precovered by tetragonal pattern of chloride anions (Fig. 13) [116,151,245]. Although, partial decomposition was observed, it could be concluded that contact with the surface does not affect the metal coordination algorithms, but actively steers the adsorption parameters (relative orientation, internal conformations, etc.)... 

Reactions of Goal Ash. Mineral matter impurities have an important effect on the utili2ation of a coal. One of the constituents of greatest concern is pyrite because of the potential for sulfur oxide generation on combustion. The highest concentrations of pyrite are associated with coal deposition under marine environments, as typified by the Illinois Basin, including parts of Illinois, Indiana, and Kentucky. Additionally, the mineral matter... 

Subsequent elegant work by Lambert and coworkers61 has shown that, while under UHV conditions the electropumped Na is indistinguishable from Na adsorbed by vacuum deposition, under electrochemical reaction conditions the electrochemically supplied Na can form surface compounds (e.g. Na nitrite/nitrate during NO reduction by CO, carbonate during NO reduction by C2FI4). These compounds (nitrates, carbonates) can be effectively decomposed via positive potential application. Furthermore the large dipole moment of Na ( 5D) dominates the UWr and O behaviour of the catalyst-electrode even when such surface compounds are formed. 

Aqueous cathodic electrodeposition has been shown to offer a low-cost route for the fabrication of large surface n-CdS/p-CdTe solar cells. In a typical procedure, CdTe films, 1-2 xm thick, are electrodeposited from common acidic tellurite bath over a thin window layer of a CdS-coated substrate under potential-controlled conditions. The as-deposited CdTe films are stoichiometric, exhibit strong preferential (111) orientation, and have n-type conductivity (doping density typically... 

Gichuhi A, Boone BE, Demir U, Shannon C (1998) Electrochemistry of S Adlayers at under-potentially deposited Cd on Au(lll) Implications for the electrosynthesis of high-quality CdS thin films. J Phys Chem B 102 6499-6506... 

During an XAS experiment, core electrons are excited. This produces empty states called core holes. These can relax by having electrons from outer shells drop into the core holes. This produces fluorescent X-rays that have a somewhat lower energy than the incident X-rays. The fluorescent signal is proportional to the absorption. Detection of this signal is a useful method for measuring absorption by dilute systems such as under potential deposited (UPD) monolayers. 

Table 4 Chemisorption characterisation of fresh Pt and Pt-Bi catalysts supported on carbon and graphite. H2 chemisorption data calculated from the charge in the hydrogen under-potential deposition (H-UPD) region of the cyclic voltammetry profiles. Values given as m2/g (total catalyst).

As was mentioned above, reports on the application of AFM in siru in electrochemistry are few. One such report concerns the study of the under-potential deposition (upd) of copper on gold and reinforces the need for caution when employing repulsive AFM to the study of adsorbed species. 

Under potential deposition is a much-studied phenomenon in electrochemistry and is the electrochemical reduction of a metal cation to form a monolayer or submonolayer of the corresponding metal at the surface of an electrode. The critical point is that deposition occurs at a potential higher than that dictated by the reversible potential of the metal/metal cation couple, suggesting that such a upd layer is energetically quite different from the bulk metal. However, subsequent deposition on a upd monolayer occurs at the expected potential, and the resulting surface is typical of the bulk metal. 

No investigation of a solid, such as the electrode in its interface with the electrolyte, can be considered complete without information on the physical structure of that solid, i.e. the arrangement of the atoms in the material with respect to each other. STM provides some information of this kind, with respect to the 2-dimensional array of the surface atoms, but what of the 3-dimensional structure of the electrode surface or the structure of a thick layer on an electrode, such as an under-potential deposited (upd) metal At the beginning of this chapter, electrocapillarity was employed to test and prove the theories of the double layer, a role it fulfilled admirably within its limitations as a somewhat indirect probe. The question arises, is it possible to see the double layer, to determine the location of the ions in solution with respect to the electrode, and to probe the double layer as the techniques above have probed adsorption Can the crystal structure of a upd metal layer be determined In essence, a technique is required that is able to investigate long- and short-range order in matter. 

Insufficient rinsing can also result in some codeposition if the previous reactant is not fully removed. The main drawback is the possibility of 3-D growth, which can be hard to identify with very thin deposits. Alternatively, the rinse solution may not be important. Some high quality CdTe films were formed in this group without using a separate rinse solution. That is, the reactant solutions were exchanged by each other, under potential control, suggesting some small amount of codeposition probably did occur. 

The characteristics of monatomic height step formation ofCu under-potential deposition on Ag(l 11) in sulfuric acid solution were observed to be dependent on electrode potentials/ At more positive underpotential deposition potential regions, STM revealed the frizzy edges of Cu underpotential deposition at the comers of Cu islands growing on the Ag( 111) terrace STM. The kink site mobility was roughly estimated as 3000 nm s . Monatomic height steps on Au(l 11) electrodes did not show any sign of frizziness under the experimental condition. ... 

Gichuhi etal. [439] have used Au(lll) electrode covered with the initial under-potentially deposited Cd layer. When H2S was electrolyzed at this surface, applying underpotential, an adlattice of the S—S interatomic spacing equal to 0.34 nm was obtained. The second monolayer of Cd and S had the same structure as the first CdS monolayer, showing that these two CdS monolayers were epitaxial. However, the third deposited monolayer of CdS exhibited interatomic spacing as observed for the bulk CdS. A direct fabrication of monodispersed, ultrasmall nanocrystals from the SAMs at Au(lll) substrate has also been described [440]. Reconstruction of CdS monolayers has been studied by Demir and Shannon [441]. 

Sachtler and Dorgelo (74) measured the change in photoelectric work function when Na and Ha were adsorbed on evaporated films of Ni and Ta. These films were deposited under a vacuum of 10 mm. Hg, and the maximum surface potentials observed were 0.1 v. for the system Ni + Ha, —0.44 V. for Ta + Ha, and —0.38 v. for Ta + Na. On the other hand, the adsorption of Ha on a Ni surface prepared under less satisfactory experimental conditions decreased the work function (7S). As a result of this work, some doubt arises as to whether the positive S.P. values reported for the adsorption of Ha on various metals, particularly Pt (68), refer to clean surfaces. 

Figure 5.6 Dark discharge of surface potential on a-Se layers. A, B, and C involve a-Se deposited under different substrate temperature (Tj) conditions A and A at = 75°C B and B at Tj = 50-60°C C and C at Fs = 25-50°C and uncontrolled [2].

Metal deposition or stripping and capacitance under constant current, (a) What is the potential transient in the case of metal deposition under constant current (/ = 10 mA/cm ) Derive its transition time x. Consider silver deposition on a silver substrate as an example ( Ag = 0.799 V, DAg - 1.65 x 10-5 cm2/s at room temperature), (b) If this process is reversed (i.e., silver is stripped from the silver substrate electrode), what should the expression be Suppose the initial solution does not contain silver salt, (c) What will the potential be at t = 0 ... 

A typical time response for a short-circuited photocurrent in the presence of hydroquinone ( Q) as an added solution redox species is shown in Figure 9. These photocurrents were stable for several hours. In the absence of in the electrolyte, the photocurrent also increased rapidly upon the onset of illumination, but subsequently decayed exponentially to 70% of its initial value in a half-decay time of ca. 25 s. This behavior is similar to that observed for chlorophyll monolayers deposited on SnC (12). Photocurrents under potentially-controlled conditions were also stable upon illumination, but exhibited slower decay characteristics when the light was turned off. This effect is unusual and is currently under further investigation. 

Cyclic voltammetry is also very useful for the study of adsorbed species1415,28-30. In the examples discussed above, it was assumed that the electroactive species and its reaction products are soluble in the solution and that surface processes can be neglected. However, if the shape of the peak is unusual (e.g. very sharp), the electrochemical reaction is probably complicated by surface processes, such as adsorption. Usually, adsorption of species favours the electrode reaction taking place at lower potentials in the case of a deposition, one speaks about under potential deposition. Different ways of adsorption can be obtained ... 

Several studies have appeared which examine the SH response from bulk single crystals of gold under potential control. The first study reported was that of Koos [134] in which both the native and underpotential deposition of thallium was studied. This was later examined in more detail for a series of different metals on Au(lll) [155]. Fig. 5.23 shows the SH intensity from Au(lll) in HC104 as a function of the azimuthal angle 0. The SH response using a 1064 nm incident beam was collected for p-polarized input and p- and s-polarized output (Fig. 5.23 a and c) and s-polarized input and p-polarized output (Fig. 5.23 b). The responses are consistent... 

However, when the adsorption process is reversible, one cannot use the traditional approach to measuring the effect of the deposition potential on the coverage, i.e. immersing a clean electrode in a deposition solution under potential control, followed by ex situ measurement of the surface coverage in a blank electrolyte solution. 

In a first part of this section, the synchrotron methods are described as they might still not be so common to many scientists in the field of corrosion research. The scanning methods are discussed only briefly, as they have been introduced by numerous papers on in situ studies of the structure of electrode surfaces. Several good reviews are found in literature, and are recommended to the interested reader they describe the application of STM to adsorption and Under Potential Deposition (UPD) metal dissolution and deposition and nano-structuring by deposition of small metal clusters [103-105]. In a following part, results are presented for a number of systems that have been studied in detail with special attention to Cu. 

---