Deposition ecosystem total

Very little reliable data are available for transfer by dry deposition. In the remote terrestrial ecosystem, total dry deposition, on all surfaces, amounted to 20 g Pb/ha-yr. Although the mechanisms of deposition are not well established, this research has shown that, for most of the year, deposition rates on smooth, flat artificial surfaces were consistently between 0.08 and 0.12 ng Pb/cm -day (6). 

Watersheds are sinks for atmospheric Hg deposition (Grigal 2002). However, they are highly variable in their ability to retain inputs of total Hg (THg), convert ionic Hg (Hg(ll)) to bioavailable methylmercury (MeHg), and snpply Hg(II) and MeHg to downstream aqnatic ecosystems, ultimately influencing exposure to sensitive biota and hnmans. 

Frescholtz 2002). Although ongoing and new planned field and laboratory studies are designed to further test this hypothesis, we feel that it is warranted at this time to develop a pilot-scale network of aimual ecosystem fluxes of THg in TF and LF as indicators of total atmospheric deposition. These fluxes can then be compared with measured wet plus modeled diy deposition based on both inferential and regional-scale models to develop independent estimates of total atmospheric deposition for forested catchments. We also believe that this approach could eventually be applied to a national network, such as the MDN. Although this method is best aimed at forested sites, ongoing research will address methods appropriate for other ecosystems. 

Hg(0), PHg, RGHg), wet deposition, throughfall, and litterfall, as discussed in the program to determine total ecosystem deposition (see Section 2.2.8). A summary of the measurements of Hg species that should be made in an intensive watershed Hg monitoring program is provided in Table 2.4. We envision that stream water measurements of total and dissolved THg and total and dissolved MeHg would also be made. 

Schell WR, Berg MT, Myttenaere C, et al. 1994. A review of the deposition and uptake of stable and radioactive elements in forests and other natural ecosystems for use in predictive modeling. Sci Total Environ 157 153-161. 

PROFILE is a biogeochemical model developed specially to calculate the influence of acid depositions on soil as a part of an ecosystem. The sets of chemical and biogeochemical reactions implemented in this model are (1) soil solution equilibrium, (2) mineral weathering, (3) nitrification and (4) nutrient uptake. Other biogeochemical processes affect soil chemistry via boundary conditions. However, there are many important physical soil processes and site conditions such as convective transport of solutes through the soil profile, the almost total absence of radial water flux (down through the soil profile) in mountain soils, the absence of radial runoff from the profile in soils with permafrost, etc., which are not implemented in the model and have to be taken into account in other ways. 

Table 4. Rainwater total salt content and salt deposition/exposure rates over various natural ecosystems in Eurasia.

Table 4. Percentage of various endpoints contribution to total environmental risk assessment of ecosystem sensitivity to acid deposition in Northern Asia (Bashkin, 1998).

As we can see from this map, sulfur deposition exceeds critical load in a wide land area that amounts to 25% of total Chinese ecosystems, which mainly refers to the southeast of China. Among these areas, the exceedances are especially serious in the lower reaches of Changjiang (Yangtze) River, in the Sichuan River Basin, and in the Delta of Zhujiang River. 

To confirm this idea two examples are given in Figures 18(a) and (b) ecosystem-dependent depositions of lead in South Norway and in Central Spain in 2002. Depositions are split in wet and dry. Wet deposition fluxes are assumed to be the same for different types of ecosystems. Annual precipitation amounts in these regions are about 1,400 (Norway) and 510 (Spain) mm. In the Norwegian region dry deposition to forests is higher than that to arable lands. However, due to the large amount of precipitation, wet deposition prevails and total deposition (sum of wet and dry) does not differ much between forests and arable lands. 

Somewhat similar levels in air, between 0.5 and 5 ng/m (mean, 2 ng/m ) of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate have been found in the Great Lakes ecosystem (Canada and United States). The concentration of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in precipitation ranged from 4 to 10 ng/L (mean, 6 ng/L). Atmospheric fluxes to the Great Lakes are a combination of dry and wet removal processes. The total deposition of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate into Lakes Superior, Michigan, Huron, Erie and Ontario was estimated to amount to 16, 11, 12, 5.0 and 3.7 tonnes per year, respectively (Eisenreich et al., 1981). 

---