Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Density of matter

Unfortunately, however, one cannot subject a liquid surface to an increased pressure without introducing a second component into the system, such as some inteit gas. One thus increases the density of matter in the gas phase and, moreover, there will be some gas adsorbed on the liquid surface with a corresponding volume change. [Pg.55]

Assume that the nucleus of the fluorine atom is a sphere with a radius of 5 X 10-13 cm. Calculate the density of matter in the fluorine nucleus. [Pg.251]

Specific ionization is dependent on the mass, charge, energy of the particle, and the electron density of matter. The greater the mass of a particle, the more interactions it produces in a given distance. A larger number of interactions results in the production of more ion pairs and a higher specific ionization. [Pg.25]

Initial conditions We mentioned that we need to fix 3 initial conditions in the center one for the central density of matter (n(0) = no or e(0) = eo), and two for the metric, either for A(0) and A (0), or, equivalently, for A(0) and (0). But we cannot properly impose these conditions in r = 0, and these conditions are somehow not independent. However the technical problem is well known already in 4 dimensions [1]. First, the proper way is to approximate the innermost core of radius 6 with a homogeneous sphere of density no, where the exact value of 6 is irrelevant if small enough. Then u no al r 6, and e2A = 1 — 87r[Pg.305]

A continuous and unending expansion if the restoring force due to gravity and hence the density of matter are too small to brake and reverse the general expanding motion. The Universe is said to be open. [Pg.199]

An expansion which slows down forever if the density of matter is just right to exactly balance the general expanding motion. This density is the critical density, of the order of one proton per 10 cubic metres. [Pg.199]

Let us examine this situation in more detail. It is quite clear that the density of matter in clusters of galaxies is significantly higher than the density of nuclear matter as deduced from primordial nucleosynthesis (2-5% of the critical density). If we assume that these structures are representative of the Universe as a whole, then in order to make up the difference, we are forced to resort to clouds of exotic elementary particles left over from the Big Bang. The fate of the Universe then lies in the hands of non-nuclear matter of unknown but not unknowable nature (e.g. neutralinos). [Pg.207]

A few minutes into the expansion, when the temperature had dropped to 109 degrees, neutrons combined with protons to form deuterium and helium nuclei. Most protons remained uncombined as hydrogen nuclei. As the universe continued to cool, the rest mass energy density of matter (gravity) came to exceed the energy density of the photons... [Pg.55]

X-ray absorption furnishes an absolute measure of the density of matter. However, in many applications the important observations to be made with X-rays concern the geometrical relationships of shock fronts and contact surfaces it is in this area where X-rays, because they make it possible to sefe inside the detonating expl, provide a uniquely appropriate tool. Until recently the difficulty has been the inability of available sources to penetrate charges more than a few inches in diameter. With the advent of the PHERMEX machine this difficulty has been overcome. Phermex provides a pulsed beam of 27 Me V electrons in 0.1 microsec bursts, which impinge on a tungsten target to generate X-rays that can easily penetrate several cm of HE. Recall that density of the shocked material can be related to particle velocity thru the conservation equations (see Vol 7, HI 79)... [Pg.234]

The dynamical density of matter in the Solar vicinity was investigated again by Oort (1932), who arrived at a different answer. According to his analysis the total density exceeds the density of visible stellar populations by a factor of up to 2. This limit is often called the Oort limit. This result means that the amount of invisible matter in the Solar vicinity could be approximately equal to the amount of visible matter. [Pg.242]

Zeldovich Deuterium nucleosynthesis in the hot Universe and the density of matter ... [Pg.249]

By the end of 1970s most objections against the dark matter hypothesis were rejected. In particular, luminous populations of galaxies have found to have lower mass-to-luminosity ratio than expected previously, thus the presence of extra dark matter both in galaxies and clusters has been confirmed. However, the nature of dark matter and its purpose was not yet clear. Also it was not clear how to explain the Big Bang nucleosynthesis constraint on the low density of matter, and the smoothness of the Hubble flow. [Pg.252]

Now, the use of both the EW and SE methods provides a possibility to manufacture novel CNM - fullerenes, nanotubes, etc. In this case we can reach the conclusion, that CNM are produced under very non-equilibrium conditions, namely under conditions of the high-energy plasmochemistry synthesis in organic mediums. At this conjuncture intensive flows and extreme densities of matters occur. It results in production of CNM due to self-organization and directional catalytic transformations. [Pg.174]

If the main part of the universe mass is owing to neutrinos, this must have a qualitative effect on the evolution of the universe. If the mass of the neutrino is zero, the observed density of matter in the universe is too small to stop the expansion caused by the Big Bang. However, if the neutrino mass is not zero, the expansion will eventually stop, and the universe will start shrinking and will collapse in some 20-30 billion years. [Pg.293]

Of course, any cosmology must account for facts such as the observed expansion of the universe. In the face of this incontrovertible observation, steady state theorists had to find a way to keep matter from thinning out as the expansion occurred and to maintain a constant density of matter over time. To do this they made a bold and unfounded basic assumption they assumed that hydrogen atoms are continuously created throughout all of space. To match the observed expansion and to maintain a constant density of matter, about one hydrogen atom must appear in each and every cubic meter of space every 300,000 years. [Pg.214]

Schramm wanted to find out if the abundances of the light elements were consistent with big bang cosmology. To answer this question, he would need to refine theoretical predictions based on the tenets of big bang cosmology, design and carry out astronomical experiments to measure the abundances of the four light elements, and compare the results. As we shall see, the results for deuterium are particularly important—deuterium abundance depends on one and only one important parameter the density of matter. [Pg.218]


See other pages where Density of matter is mentioned: [Pg.569]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.31]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.366 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.261 ]




SEARCH



Matter density

© 2024 chempedia.info