Wave-function calculations density functional theory

Density functional theory calculations. deMon for density functional calculations. Turbomole for Hartree-Fock and MP2 ab initio calculations. ZINDO for extended Hiickel, PPP, CNDO, and INDO semiempirical molecular orbital calculations and prediction of electronic spectra. Plane Wave for band structures of semiconductors. ESOCS for electronic structure of solids. DSolid for density functional theory calculations of periodic solids. Silicon Graphics and IBM workstation versions. 

We have anployed the parametrized DFTB method of Porezag et al. [33,34]. The approximate DFTB method is based on the density-functional theory of Hohenberg and Kohn in the formulation of Kohn and Sham [43,44]. In this method, the single particle wave functions l (r) of the Kohn-Sham equations are expanded in a set of atomic-like basis functions < > , with m being a compound index that describes the atom on which the function is centered, the angular dependence of the function, as well as its radial dependence. These functions are obtained from self-consistent density functional calculations on the isolated atoms employing a large set of Slater-type basis functions. The effective Kohn-Sham potential Feff(r) is approximated as a simple superposition of the potentials of the neutral atoms... 

To use direct dynamics for the study of non-adiabatic systems it is necessary to be able to efficiently and accurately calculate electronic wave functions for excited states. In recent years, density functional theory (DFT) has been gaining ground over traditional Hartree-Fock based SCF calculations for the treatment of the ground state of large molecules. Recent advances mean that so-called time-dependent DFT methods are now also being applied to excited states. Even so, at present, the best general methods for the treatment of the photochemistry of polyatomic organic molecules are MCSCF methods, of which the CASSCF method is particularly powerful. 

A basis set is a set of functions used to describe the shape of the orbitals in an atom. Molecular orbitals and entire wave functions are created by taking linear combinations of basis functions and angular functions. Most semiempirical methods use a predehned basis set. When ah initio or density functional theory calculations are done, a basis set must be specihed. Although it is possible to create a basis set from scratch, most calculations are done using existing basis sets. The type of calculation performed and basis set chosen are the two biggest factors in determining the accuracy of results. This chapter discusses these standard basis sets and how to choose an appropriate one. 

The pseudopotential density-functional technique is used to calculate total energies, forces on atoms and stress tensors as described in Ref. 13 and implemented in the computer code CASTEP. CASTEP uses a plane-wave basis set to expand wave-functions and a preconditioned conjugate gradient scheme to solve the density-functional theory (DFT) equations iteratively. Brillouin zone integration is carried out via the special points scheme by Monkhorst and Pack. The nonlocal pseudopotentials in Kleynman-Bylander form were optimized in order to achieve the best convergence with respect to the basis set size. 5... 

It is a truism that in the past decade density functional theory has made its way from a peripheral position in quantum chemistry to center stage. Of course the often excellent accuracy of the DFT based methods has provided the primary driving force of this development. When one adds to this the computational economy of the calculations, the choice for DFT appears natural and practical. So DFT has conquered the rational minds of the quantum chemists and computational chemists, but has it also won their hearts To many, the success of DFT appeared somewhat miraculous, and maybe even unjust and unjustified. Unjust in view of the easy achievement of accuracy that was so hard to come by in the wave function based methods. And unjustified it appeared to those who doubted the soundness of the theoretical foundations. There has been misunderstanding concerning the status of the one-determinantal approach of Kohn and Sham, which superficially appeared to preclude the incorporation of correlation effects. There has been uneasiness about the molecular orbitals of the Kohn-Sham model, which chemists used qualitatively as they always have used orbitals but which in the physics literature were sometimes denoted as mathematical constructs devoid of physical (let alone chemical) meaning. 

A new and accurate quantum mechanical model for charge densities obtained from X-ray experiments has been proposed. This model yields an approximate experimental single determinant wave function. The orbitals for this wave function are best described as HF orbitals constrained to give the experimental density to a prescribed accuracy, and they are closely related to the Kohn-Sham orbitals of density functional theory. The model has been demonstrated with calculations on the beryllium crystal. 

All calculations presented here are based on density-functional theory [37] (DFT) within the LDA and LSD approximations. The Kohn-Sham orbitals [38] are expanded in a plane wave (PW) basis set, with a kinetic energy cutoff of 70 Ry. The Ceperley-Alder expression for correlation and gradient corrections of the Becke-Perdew type are used [39]. We employ ah initio pseudopotentials, generated by use of the Troullier-Martins scheme [40], The coreradii used, in au, were 1.23 for the s, p atomic orbitals of carbon, 1.12 for s, p of N, 0.5 for the s of H, and 1.9, 2.0, 1.5, 1.97,... 

Since the early days of quantum mechanics, the wave function theory has proven to be very successful in describing many different quantum processes and phenomena. However, in many problems of quantum chemistry and solid-state physics, where the dimensionality of the systems studied is relatively high, ab initio calculations of the structure of atoms, molecules, clusters, and crystals, and their interactions are very often prohibitive. Hence, alternative formulations based on the direct use of the probability density, gathered under what is generally known as the density matrix theory [1], were also developed since the very beginning of the new mechanics. The independent electron approximation or Thomas-Fermi model, and the Hartree and Hartree-Fock approaches are former statistical models developed in that direction [2]. These models can be considered direct predecessors of the more recent density functional theory (DFT) [3], whose principles were established by Hohenberg,... 

The W-acyliminium ion can be characterized by FTIR spectroscopy as well.9 The starting carbamate 1 exhibited an absorption at 1694 cm 1 due to the carbonyl stretching, while the V-acyliminium ion 2 generated by the cation pool method exhibited an absorption at 1814 cm 1. The higher wave number observed for the cation is consistent with the existence of a positive charge at the nitrogen atom adjacent to the carbonyl carbon. The shift to higher wave number is also supported by DFT (density functional theory) calculations. 

The basic variable in density functional theory (DFT)22 is the electron density n(r). In the usual implementation of DFT, the density is calculated from the occupied single-particle wave functions (r) of an auxiliary system of noninteracting electrons... 

More recently, electrostatic theory has been revived due to the concept of molecular electrostatic potentials. The potential of the solute molecule or ion was used successfully to discuss preferred orientations of solvent molecules or solvation sites 50—54). Electrostatic potentials can be calculated without further difficulty provided the nuclear geometry (Rk) and the electron density function q(R) or the molecular wave function W rxc, [Pg.14]

---