Density functional theory relativistic approaches

The hyperpolarizability of tin derivatives can alternatively be computed within the framework of the density functional theory (DFT) approach (e.g. at the B3PW91/6-31+G /LANL2DZ(Sn) level), using the time-consuming finite field procedure. " The use of a pseudo-potential is required to allow the description of relativistic effects for tin. In this approach, p is obtained as the numerical partial derivative of the energy (W) with respect to the electric field (E), evaluated at zero field, according to the following equation ... 

Autschbach and Ziegler presented relativistic spin-spin coupling constants based on the two-component ZORA formulation. They published four papers. In the first paper of their series, only the scalar relativistic part was included, and a full inclusion of the ZORA effects was implemented in the second paper. They used the density functional theory (DFT) approach. The first paper showed that scalar relativistic calculations are able to reproduce major parts of the relativistic effects on the one-bond metal-ligand couplings of systems containing Pt, Hg and Pb. It was found that the... 

It is clear that an ah initio calculation of the ground state of AF Cr, based on actual experimental data on the magnetic structure, would be at the moment absolutely unfeasible. That is why most calculations are performed for a vector Q = 2ir/a (1,0,0). In this case Cr has a CsCl unit cell. The local magnetic moments at different atoms are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction. Such an approach is used, in particular, in papers [2, 3, 4], in which the electronic structure of Cr is calculated within the framework of spin density functional theory. Our paper [6] is devoted to the study of the influence of relativistic effects on the electronic structure of chromium. The results of calculations demonstrate that the relativistic effects completely change the structure of the Or electron spectrum, which leads to its anisotropy for the directions being identical in the non-relativistic approach. 

On the other hand, high-level computational methods are limited, for obvious reasons, to very simple systems.122 Calculations are likely to have limited accuracy due to basis set effects, relativistic contributions, and spin orbit corrections, especially in the case of tin hydrides, but these concerns can be addressed. Given the computational economy of density functional theories and the excellent behavior of the hybrid-DFT B3LYP123 already demonstrated for calculations of radical energies,124 we anticipate good progress in the theoretical approach. We hope that this collection serves as a reference for computational work that we are certain will be forthcoming. 

In subsection 3.1, we will present GGA and LDA calculations for Au clusters with 6first principles method outlined in section 2, which employs the same scalar-relativistic pseudo-potential for LDA and GGA (see Fig 1). These calculations show the crucial relevance of the level of density functional theory (DFT), namely the quality of the exchange-correlation functional, to predict the correct structures of Au clusters. Another, even more critical, example is presented in subsection 3.2, where we show that both approaches, LDA and GGA, predict the cage-like tetrahedral structure of Au2o as having lower energy than amorphous-like isomers, whereas for other Au clusters, namely Auig, Au ... 

The use of computational chemistry to address issues relative to process design was discussed in an article. The need for efficient software for massively parallel architectures was described. Methods to predict the electronic structure of molecules are described for the molecular orbital and density functional theory approaches. Two examples of electronic stracture calculations are given. The first shows that one can now make extremely accurate predictions of the thermochemistry of small molecules if one carefully considers all of the details such as zero-point energies, core-valence corrections, and relativistic corrections. The second example shows how more approximate computational methods, still based on high level electronic structure calculations, can be used to address a complex waste processing problem at a nuclear production facility (Dixon and Feller, 1999). 

For the case of a purely electrostatic external potential, P = (F , 0), the complete proof of the relativistic HK-theorem can be repeated using just the zeroth component f (x) of the four current (in the following often denoted by the more familiar n x)), i.e. the structure of the external potential determines the minimum set of basic variables for a DFT approach. As a consequence the ground state and all observables, in this case, can be understood as unique functionals of the density n only. This does, however, not imply that the spatial components of the current vanish, but rather that j(jc) = < o[w]liWI oM) has to be interpreted as a functional of n(x). Thus for standard electronic structure problems one can choose between a four current DFT description and a formulation solely in terms of n x), although one might expect the former approach to be more useful in applications to systems with j x) 0 as soon as approximations are involved. This situation is similar to the nonrelativistic case where for a spin-polarised system not subject to an external magnetic field B both the 0 limit of spin-density functional theory as well as the original pure density functional theory can be used. While the former leads in practice to more accurate results for actual spin-polarised systems (as one additional symmetry of the system is take into account explicitly), both approaches coincide for unpolarized systems. 

It is directly possible to prove a HK-theorem for the form (3.55) using the density n and the gauge-dependent current jp — (c/e)V x m as basic DFT variables, but not for the form (3.54) which would suggest to use n and the full current j. One is thus led to the statement that the first set of variables can legitimately be used to set up nonrelativistic current density functional theory, indicating at first glance a conflict with the fully relativistic DFT approach. 

While a great deal of progress has proved possible for the case of the hydrogen atom by direct solution of the Schrodinger wave equation, some of which will be summarized below, at the time of writing the treatment of many-electron atoms necessitates a simpler approach. This is afforded by the semi-classical Thomas-Fermi theory [4-6], the first explicit form of what today is termed density functional theory [7,8]. We shall summarize below the work of Hill et al. [9], who solved the Thomas-Fermi (TF) equation for heavy positive ions in the limit of extremely strong magnetic fields. This will lead naturally into the formulation of relativistic Thomas-Fermi (TF) theory [10] and to a discussion of the role of the virial in this approximate theory [11]. 

During the last 10-20 years, a large number of efficient theoretical methods for the calculation of linear and nonlinear optical properties have been developed— this development includes semi-empirical, highly correlated ab initio, and density functional theory methods. Many of these approaches will be reviewed in later chapters of this book, and applications will be given that illustrate the merits and limitations of theoretical studies of linear and nonlinear optical processes. It will become clear that theoretical studies today can provide valuable information in Are search for materials with specific nonlinear optical properties. First, there is the possibility to screen classes of materials based on cost and time effective calculations rather then labor intensive synthesis and characterization work. Second, there is Are possibility to obtain a microscopic understanding for the performance of the material—one can investigate the role of individual transition channels, dipole moments, etc., and perform systematic model Improvements by inclusion of the environment, relativistic effects, etc. 

A different approach to the solution of the electron correlation problem comes from density functional theory (see Chapter 4). We hasten to add that in a certain approximation of relativistic density functional theory, which is also reviewed in this book, exchange and correlation functionals are taken to replace Dirac-Fock potentials in the SCF equations. Another approach, which we will not discuss here, is the direct perturbation method as developed by Rutkowski, Schwarz and Kutzelnigg (Kutzel-nigg 1989, 1990 Rutkowski 1986a,b,c Rutkowski and Schwarz 1990 Schwarz et al. 1991). 

In addition to the ab initio approach to relativistic electronic structure of molecules, four-component Kohn-Sham programs, which approximate the electron-electron interaction by approximate exchange-correlation functionals from density functional theory, have also been developed (Liu et al. 1997 Sepp et al. 1986). However, we concentrate on the ab initio methods and refer the reader to Chapter 4, which treats relativistic density functional theory (RDFT). 

A suitable computational approach for the investigation of electronic and geometric structures of transactinide compounds is the fully relativistic Dirac-Slater discrete-variational method (DS-DVM), in a modem version called the density functional theory (DFT) method, which was originally developed in the 1970s (Rosdn and Ellis 1975). It offers a good compromise between accuracy and computational effort. A detailed description can be found in Chapter 4 of this book. 

Mateev, A. V. and Rttsch, N. (2002) Self-consistent spin-orbit interaction in the Douglas-Kroll approach to relativistic density functional theory. (In preparation.)... 

Rosch, N., Kriiger, S., Mayer, M. andNasluzov.V. A. (1996) The Douglas-Kroll-Hess approach to relativistic density functional theory Methodological aspects and applications to metal complexes and clusters. In Recent Developments and Applications of Modem Density Functional Theory (ed. J. M. Seminario), pp. 497-566. Elsevier. 

With the exception of Ligand Field Theory, where the inclusion of atomic spin-orbit coupling is easy, a complete molecular treatment of relativity is difficult although not impossible. The work of Ellis within the Density Functional Theory DVXa framework is notable in this regard [132]. At a less rigorous level, it is relatively straightforward to develop a partial relativistic treatment. The most popular approach is to modify the potential of the core electrons to mimic the potential appropriate to the relativistically treated atom. This represents a specific use of so-called Effective Core Potentials (ECPs). Using ECPs reduces the numbers of electrons to be included explicitly in the calculation and hence reduces the execution time. Relativistic ECPs within the Hartree-Fock approximation [133] are available for all three transition series. A comparable frozen core approximation [134] scheme has been adopted for... 

---