Deformation Kinematics

The mass conservation law is m = m, and (2.5) suggests that the law of conservation of linear momentum is satisfied in the inertial frames in the following manner  

Note that the force vector represented in the form of (2.5) is a fundamental hypothesis of Newtonian mechanics (i.e., the frame indifference of a force vector see Sect. 2.2.2). The third law gives the interacting forces for a two-body problem, and this will not be treated here. 

If the relative velocity V of the Galilean ttansformation (2.4) approaches the speed of light c, the uniformity of time is not applicable, and the Newtonian framework is no longer valid. That is, the Galilean transformation is changed into the Lorentz transformation under invariance of Maxwell s electtomagnetic equations, and the equation of motion is now described in relation to Einstein s theory of relativity.  

When we consider the motion of a material body, constituent atoms and molecules are not directly taken into consideration since this wiU require an inordinate amount of analysis. Therefore we represent the real material by an equivalent shape of a subdomain of the n-dimensional real number space R , and apply the Newtonian principles to this image. This procedure leads to Continuum Mechanics the term continuum is a result of the continuity properties of the n-dimensional real number space M . 

---

Velocity The term kinematics refers to the quantitative description of fluid motion or deformation. The rate of deformation depends on the distribution of velocity within the fluid. Fluid velocity v is a vector quantity, with three cartesian components i , and v.. The velocity vector is a function of spatial position and time. A steady flow is one in which the velocity is independent of time, while in unsteady flow v varies with time. 

As with any constitutive theory, the particular forms of the constitutive functions must be constructed, and their parameters (material properties) must be evaluated for the particular materials whose response is to be predicted. In principle, they are to be evaluated from experimental data. Even when experimental data are available, it is often difficult to determine the functional forms of the constitutive functions, because data may be sparse or unavailable in important portions of the parameter space of interest. Micromechanical models of material deformation may be helpful in suggesting functional forms. Internal state variables are particularly useful in this regard, since they may often be connected directly to averages of micromechanical quantities. Often, forms of the constitutive functions are chosen for their mathematical or computational simplicity. When deformations are large, extrapolation of functions borrowed from small deformation theories can produce surprising and sometimes unfortunate results, due to the strong nonlinearities inherent in the kinematics of large deformations. The construction of adequate constitutive functions and their evaluation for particular... 

Kinematical relations in large deformations are given here for reference. Most of the material is well known, and may be extracted or deduced from the comprehensive expositions of Truesdell and Toupin [19], Truesdell and Noll [20], or other texts in continuum mechanics, where further details may be found. 

Around defects, the scattering power differs from that in the perfect crystal because X-rays which do not satisly the Bragg condition in the perfect crystal may be diffracted in the deformed region arotmd the defect. Just as in the Lang projection topograph, these regions behave as small crystals which diffract kinematically and the net result is an increase in the intensity over that from the perfect crystal. 

The final D3 phase of deformation is associated with a change to a transpressional kinematic regime. Whereas structures associated with... 

The application of force to a stationary or moving system can be described in static, kinematic, or dynamic terms that define the mechanical similarity of processing equipment and the solids or liquids within their confines. Static similarity relates the deformation under constant stress of one body... 

The application of force to a stationary or moving system can be described in static, kinematic, or dynamic terms that define the mechanical similarity of processing equipment and the solids or liquids within their confines. Static similarity relates the deformation under constant stress of one body or structure to that of another it exists when geometric similarity is maintained even as elastic or plastic deformation of stressed structural components occurs [53], In contrast, kinematic similarity encompasses the additional dimension of time, while dynamic similarity involves the forces (e.g., pressure, gravitational, centrifugal) that accelerate or retard moving masses in dynamic systems. The inclusion of tune as another dimension necessitates the consideration of corresponding times, t and t, for which the time scale ratio t, defined as t = t It, is a constant. 

A fluid packet, like a solid, can experience motion in the form of translation and rotation, and strain in the form of dilatation and shear. Unlike a solid, which achieves a certain finite strain for a given stress, a fluid continues to deform. Therefore we will work in terms of a strain rate rather than a strain. We will soon derive the relationships between how forces act to move and strain a fluid. First, however, we must establish some definitions and kinematic relationships. 

The complete stress-strain relation requires the six as to be written in terms of the six y components. The result is a 6 x 6 matrix with 36 coefficients in place of the single constant, Twenty-one of these coefficients (the diagonal elements and half of the cross elements) are needed to express the deformation of a completely anisotropic material. Only three are necessary for a cubic crystal, and two for an amorphous isotropic body. Similar considerations prevail for viscous flow, in which the kinematic variable is y. 

Now that we have discussed the geometric interpretation of the rate of strain tensor, we can proceed with a somewhat more formal mathematical presentation. We noted earlier that the (deviatoric) stress tensor t related to the flow and deformation of the fluid. The kinematic quantity that expresses fluid flow is the velocity gradient. Velocity is a vector and in a general flow field each of its three components can change in any of the three... 

We first derive the kinematics of the deformation. The flow situation is shown in Fig. 14.14. Coordinate z is the vertical distance in the center of the axisymmetric bubble with the film emerging from the die at z = 0. The radius of the bubble R and its thickness 8 are a function of z. We chose a coordinate system C, embedded in the inner surface of the bubble. We discussed extensional flows in Section 3.1 where we defined the velocity field of extensional flows as... 

Equivalent considerations for nonstatic, sheared systems demonstrate the kinematical possibility of such shearing motions. This requires, inter alia, that the distance between any two sphere centers remains larger than 2a. The static viewpoint can be generalized to such circumstances as follows Rather than considering the lattice deformation, it suffices to examine the deformed collision sphere. The latter body 3 is defined as the set of points... 

The scattering is purely kinematic there is no interaction of the neutron with the electrons. Thus, there are no selection rules, and all modes are allowed. Modes such as torsions, out-of-plane bends, and skeletal deformations often give intense IINS features, because a small angular motion of the atom to which the hydrogen is... 

---