Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Definition of the Scale

Diiodine is chosen as the reference Lewis acid. The standard conditions are T = 25 °C and an alkane (e.g. n-heptane or cyclohexane) is the solvent. Diiodine provides a remarkable opportunity to study halogen-bonded complexes from three regions of the electronic spectrum in which the absorption is directly related either to the concentration of the complex (the charge-transfer band, often around 240-350 nm, and the blue-shifted band, around 400-510 nm) or to the concentration of free diiodine (the visible band at 520 nm in n-heptane). In alkanes, diiodine interacts with Lewis bases B to form stable molecular [Pg.237]

These constants are usually obtained from the UV-visible spectra of the solutions. When the base does not absorb in the region studied. Equation 5.8  [Pg.238]

IR spectrometry, NMR spectrometry and calorimetry have also been used [59-61] since IR intensities, NMR chemical shifts and complexation heats are proportional to the concentration of B or BI2, or to a linear combination of the concentrations of these species. In these methods, the second unknown, in addition to the unknown Kc, is either the IR absorption coefficient or the NMR chemical shift of the complex or the calorimetric enthalpy of complexation. [Pg.239]

The fact that the determination of diiodine complexation constants is dependent on a second unknown makes values more uncertain than the hydrogen-bond formation constants. A revision of the statistical evaluation of diiodine complexation constants obtained by the popular Benesi-Hildebrand method [53] shows [57] that the confidence interval is always much larger than previously reported. Examples of revised 95% confidence limits are (in 1 mol ) 0.32-0.40, 0.53-1.86 and 1.10-1.32 for the complexation constants of diiodine with 1-bromobutane, benzene and dioxane, respectively. However, better 95% confidence intervals can be obtained. A careful application of the Rose-Drago method to the complexation of diiodine with carbonyl bases gives [62], for example 0.53 0.04 (benzaldehyde), 1.12 0.06 (acetone), 8.1 0.7 (AA -dimethylbenzamide) and 15 0.4 (A,A-dimethylacetamide) (in 1 mol , in heptane at 25 °C). [Pg.239]


In the finite-gap case, however, the radial velocity gradient must also be determined from the solution. Using the definition of the scaled velocity V = v/r, we write the radial-velocity derivative as... [Pg.707]

Universality and two-parameter scaling in the general case of finite excluded volume, Be comes about by the much more sophisticated mechanism of renormalization. As will be discussed in later chapters (see Chap. 11, in particular) both the discrete chain model and the continuous chain model can be mapped on the same renormalized theory. The renormalized results superficially look similar to expressions like Eq. (7.13), but the definition of the scaling variables iie, z is more com plica led. Indeed, it is in the definition of R ) and z in terms of the parameters of the original unrenormalized theory, that the difference in microstructure of the continuous or discrete chain models is absorbed. [Pg.109]

Equation (2) for a reaction giving a set of apparent substituent constants o can be rewritten in the form, (o- t/ ) = r a - cr ), where r is constant for the reaction regardless of substituents. As the increment of any o-from (f should be a reasonable measure of the resonance capability of the respective substituents, this proportionality represents a linear resonance energy relationship. The original form (Yukawa and Tsuno, 1959, 1965) using cr instead of (f in (2) has the same significance since the proportionality relation holds for the resonance increment (a - t/ ) or (a - cr). The definition of resonance substituent constants Ao by any set of (o— o") is arbitrary, and the definition of the r scale is also arbitrary. While the definition of the r = 0 scale by [Pg.269]

A simple inequality follows from the definition of the scaling-nesting semisimilarity measure For three objects X, Y, and Z, all of unit volume, Sf xY) scales so a version A, of it fits within Y, and s yz) scales y so a version of it fits within Z. Consequently, a scaling factor xYfyrz) certainly reduces X so that a version X of it fits within Z. However, by definition, Sf z) is the largest scaling factor of X that allows X to fit within Z. Consequently,... [Pg.174]

The above definition of the scaled external potentials of subsystems immediately implies their shapes f or the limiting values of X (see Fig. 2) ... [Pg.241]

This is a general definition of the scaling chemical potential, valid for any nnmber of energy varieties in the system. [Pg.721]

It is seen that the terms are scaled as if extending the time increment from h to Kh, whereby the dynamic terms get less weight. A similar featnre is fonnd in the high-frequency algorithm to be developed below, bnt now with a different definition of the scaling parameter k. The balanced dissipation algorithm is summarized in Table 1. [Pg.64]

As before, the scaling transform is defined by S (a, b) = Z7o(a, b). FVom the definition of the scaling transform we have d S (a = oo,b) = 0, for all b. FVom the asymptotic expansion above, we also have d S (a = 0,6) = 0. Therefore, —dnS (a. 6) must have local extrema, in the scale variable, for any 6. As noted earlier, this expression also corresponds to the subtotal of all wavelet terms, in the translation variable index, contributing to (6) at scale value a. [Pg.239]

Determine the final overpressure and impulse from the definitions of the scaled variables. [Pg.163]

STEP 7 Determine the final overpressure. From the definition of the scaled pressure,... [Pg.180]

Figure 5.3 Definition of the scale and intensity of segregation along with the scale of examination. (Reprinted from Ref. 4 with kind permission from John Wiley Sons. Inc., New York. USA.)... Figure 5.3 Definition of the scale and intensity of segregation along with the scale of examination. (Reprinted from Ref. 4 with kind permission from John Wiley Sons. Inc., New York. USA.)...
Finally, in this account of multiparameter extensions of the Hammett equation, we comment briefiy on the origins of the aj scale. This had its beginnings around 1956 in the a scale of Roberts and Moreland for substituents X in the reactions of 4-X-bicyclo[2.2.2]octane-l derivatives. However, at that time few values of a were available. A more practical basis for a scale of inductive substituent constants lay in the cr values for XCH2 derived from Taft s analysis of the reactivities of aliphatic esters into polar, steric, and resonance effects (see Section 3.1). For the few a values available it was shown that a for X was related to a for XCH2 by the equation o = 0.45(t. Thereafter the factor 0.45 was used to calculate O / values of X from cr values of XCH2. Taft s analysis of ester reactivities was also important because it led to the definition of the scale of substituent steric parameters, thereby permitting the development of multiparameter extensions of the Hammett equation involving steric as well as electronic terms. [Pg.1491]

Table 4 Anharmonic energy demands and thermal fluctuations associated with distortions associated with the first three normal vibrational modes of W(CO)g (B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ-PP results, see text for a definition of the scaling factor a) ... Table 4 Anharmonic energy demands and thermal fluctuations associated with distortions associated with the first three normal vibrational modes of W(CO)g (B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ-PP results, see text for a definition of the scaling factor a) ...

See other pages where Definition of the Scale is mentioned: [Pg.73]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.669]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.721]    [Pg.237]   


SEARCH



Definition and Properties of the Absolute Potential Scale in Solid Electrochemistry

Definition of the BF3 Affinity Scale

Definition of the Donor Number Scale

Scale definition

Scaling definition

The 6 scale

© 2024 chempedia.info