Definition of geometric parameters

Nonlocal DFT calculation with Becke-88-Perdew-86 functional and doubly polarized triple-zeta STO basis set see Ref. 133 see 21 for definition of geometrical parameters. 

Figure 10.3 Definition of geometrical parameters for a CMA shown for the case of off-axis focusing of a point source (Q). Rt and Ra are the radii of the inner and outer field cylinders, respectively 4, is the radial image distance to the inner cylinder (in analogy, one can introduce a radial source distance ds, in the present case one has ds = R,) z is the total distance between source and image measured along the symmetry axis of the analyser zf is the corresponding distance for the field region is the entrance angle into the analyser (due to symmetry properties this is equal to the exit angle).

FIGURE 20. Definitions of geometric parameters of l-metallallenes and 2-metallallenes. 0 = 61 +... 

Figure 9. Definition of geometrical parameters in A HX (X=F,C1). R is the distance between the center of mass of HX and the middle of At2- is the angle between the R vector and the HX axis. O is a dihedral angle between Ar-Ar and HX axes.

Figure 9.3 Definition of geometric parameters of the oxyanion hole.

Figure 5.27 Illustration of geometry of H O—HF- HF complex, including definition of geometrical parameters ...

Fig. 6.1. Definition of geometrical parameters describing the disposition of nucleophile N relative to RR C=0...

Fig. 6.9. Definition of geometrical parameters for YMX3 fragments with approximate symmetry...

Figure 4 Definitions of geometrical parameters for the transition state of (a) Cope rearrangement (b) Claisen rearrangement...

Figure 2 (A) ICD of a DNA intercalator calculated as a function of the transition moment in the plane of the intercalation pocket and centred on the helix axis, y is the angle between the transition moment and the DNA dyad axis. Reproduced with permission from Lyng, Hard and Norden (1987) Biopolymer 2Q 1327. (B) definition of geometrical parameters of a DNA-ligand system with r=0,a = 90° and p = 0°, then y corresponds to the orientation of an intercalator transition moment (see top figure). Typical minor groove binding geometry parameters are r= 7 A, a = 45°, = 0° and y = 0.

FIGURE 54.1 (a) Definition of geometric parameters d, to, A, and 6 for y-hydrogen abstraction, (b) Chair-like hydrogen abstraction geometry, (c) Boat-like hydrogen abstraction geometry. 

FIGURE 55.1 Definition of geometric parameters for y-hydrogen abstraction (a) and those for 5-hydrogen atom... 

Fig. 4.5. Definition of geometrical parameters of structures, where bgs is the nominal width of trenches, bgi is the real width of trenches, bss is the nominal width of bars, bsi is the real width of bars, h is the depth or thickness of a structure, Abg is the widening of structures, Abs is the reducing of width of bars and P is the angle...

Equations such as (5.1) are also found in the two-states theories of water. These theories aim at explaining all the properties of water via the peculiar features of an open (icelike) and closed qiecies of water (the remainder of the liquid sample). According to these theoretical approaches, the thermodynamic parameters (density, enthalpy, dependence on temperature and pressure of the probability of belonging to one spedes, etc.) characteristic of the two species must be defined via a compromise. In contrast to what happens in the case of density, the definition of these parameters turns out to be unsatisfactory. Geometrical arguments show that it is reasonable to give the... 

The intemuclear distances and angles listed in the following tables are based on various different definitions. Some of them are defined on physical and geometrical principles, while others are defined operationally, i.e. by the method used for deriving the parameters from the experimental data. Numerically, the differences may not necessarily be inqtortant in comparison with experimental uncertainties, but it is always important to specify the definition of the parameters determined in order to make a precise and systematic comparison of experimental stractures with one another or with the corresponding theoretical stractures, such as those derived fi om ab initio calculations. A brief summary of the definitions is made in the present section. For a more detailed discussion of the significance of the stractures and their relationship, see General References [E-10], [E-20]. 

The advantages of this approach for part 3 of the standard lie in the fact that no specifications on geometrical magnifications need to be made since these parameters implicitly result from the demanded IQI detectability. Furthermore, the standard is open to additional applications. All that is needed is to the definition of the respective equipment class and a specification on the respective IQI sensitivities. 

The other geometrical parameters such as the number of blades and the blade angle, which are not included in the ratio of the volume of fill to the impeller volume, evidently play a definite role (see Fig. 8). 

Some aspects of the mentioned relationships have been presented in previous chapters while discussing special characteristics of the alloying behaviour. The reader is especially directed to Chapter 2 for the role played by some factors in the definition of phase equilibria aspects, such as compound formation capability, solid solution formation and their relationships with the Mendeleev Number and Pettifor and Villars maps. Stability and enthalpy of formation of alloys and Miedema s model and parameters have also been briefly commented on. In Chapter 3, mainly dedicated to the structural characteristics of the intermetallic phases, a number of comments have been reported about the effects of different factors, such as geometrical factor, atomic dimension factor, etc. on these characteristics. 

Computational modeling can be a very powerful tool to understand the structure and dynamics of complex supramolecular assemblies in biological systems. We need to sharpen the definition of the term model somewhat, designating a procedure that allows us to quantitatively predict the physical properties of the system. In that sense, the simple geometrical illustrations in Fig. 1 only qualify if by some means experimentally accessible parameters can be calculated. As an example, a quantitative treatment of DNA bending in the solenoid model would only be possible if beyond the mechanical and charge properties of... 

Figure 24.1 Coordinate system and geometric parameters used to characterize mixing processes in a river. See Table 24.1 for definitions of symbols.

---