Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Deactivation reforming

In addition, salts deactivate reforming and catalytic cracking catalysts. [Pg.329]

The presence of tars in the product gas is highly undesirable in synthesis gas for hydrogen applications. Tar formation represents a reduction in gasification efficiency since less of the biomass is converted to a fuel or synthesis gas. More importantly, tars would degrade the performance of those systems. Tars can deactivate reforming catalysts, and fuel cell toleration of tars is low. [Pg.131]

C, 0.356—1.069 m H2/L (2000—6000 fU/bbl) of Hquid feed, and a space velocity (wt feed per wt catalyst) of 1—5 h. Operation of reformers at low pressure, high temperature, and low hydrogen recycle rates favors the kinetics and the thermodynamics for aromatics production and reduces operating costs. However, all three of these factors, which tend to increase coking, increase the deactivation rate of the catalyst therefore, operating conditions are a compromise. More detailed treatment of the catalysis and chemistry of catalytic reforming is available (33—35). Typical reformate compositions are shown in Table 6. [Pg.179]

Catalysts in this service can deactivate by several different mechanisms, but deactivation is ordinarily and primarily the result of deposition of carbonaceous materials onto the catalyst surface during hydrocarbon charge-stock processing at elevated temperature. This deposit of highly dehydrogenated polymers or polynuclear-condensed ring aromatics is called coke. The deposition of coke on the catalyst results in substantial deterioration in catalyst performance. The catalyst activity, or its abiUty to convert reactants, is adversely affected by this coke deposition, and the catalyst is referred to as spent. The coke deposits on spent reforming catalyst may exceed 20 wt %. [Pg.222]

Hydrofining is applied to virgin naphthas mainly in the form of a pretreatment step for the feed to catalytic reformers (Powerforming). Sulfur levels of 5 parts per million (ppm) or less are required to avoid deactivation of the platinum reforming catalyst. [Pg.67]

It should be noted that fast inactivation of receptor signaling not only involves the desensitization of the receptor but also the components of the downstream signaling cascade. The deactivation of active Ga subunits is controlled by the intramolecular hydrolysis of bound GTP, allowing it to reform the inactive heterotrimer. Termination of G protein-mediated signaling in vivo is 10- to 100-fold faster than the in vitro rate of GTP hydrolysis by Ga subunits, suggesting... [Pg.1204]

Fig. 3 showed the catalyst stability of Ni-Mg/HY, Ni-Mn/HY, and Ni/HY catalysts in the methme reforming with carbon dioxide at 700°C. Nickel and promoter contents were fixed at 13 wt.% and 5 wt.%, respectively. Initial activities over M/HY and metal-promoted Ni/HY catalysts were almost the same. It is noticeable that the addition of Mn and Mg to the Ni/HY catalyst remarkably stabilized the catalyst praformance and retarded the catalyst deactivation. Especially, the Ni-Mg/HY catalyst showed methane and carbon dioxide conversions more thrm ca. 85% and 80%, respectively, without significant deactivation even after the 72 h catalytic reaction. [Pg.192]

Figure 1 shows the effects of reaction temperature on the conversions of CO2 and CH4 over Ni-YSZ-Ce02 and Ni-YSZ-MgO catalysts. It was found that the Ni-YSZ-Ce02 catalyst is showed higher catalytic activity than the Ni-YSZ-MgO catalyst at temperature range of 650 850 Ti and the maximum activity was observed at above 800 °C, the optimum temperature for internal reforming in SOFC system [5]. In our previous work, it was identified that Ni-YSZ-MgO catalyst was deactivated with reaction time, however Ni-YSZ-Ce02 showed stable catalytic activity more than Ni-YSZ-MgO catalyst imder tiie tested conditions [6]. [Pg.615]

Figure 8.7 confirms that this is correct A single nickel catalyst used for steam reforming of n-butane deactivates steadily and gains weight due to the accumulation of carbon, but a Ni-Au catalyst maintains its reforming activity at a constant level [F. Besenbacher, I. ChorkendorfF, B.S. Clausen, B. Hammer, A.M. Molenbroek, J.K. Norskov and I. Stensgaard, Science 279 (1998) 1913]. [Pg.309]

Nickel catalysts used in steam reforming are more resistant to deactivation by carbon deposition if the surface contains sulfur, or gold. Explain why these elements act as promoters. Would you prefer sulfur or gold as a promoter Explain your answer. [Pg.410]

The activity and stability of catalysts for methane-carbon dioxide reforming depend subtly upon the support and the active metal. Methane decomposes to carbon and hydrogen, forming carbon on the oxide support and the metal. Carbon on the metal is reactive and can be oxidized to CO by oxygen from dissociatively adsorbed COj. For noble metals this reaction is fast, leading to low coke accumulation on the metal particles The rate of carbon formation on the support is proportional to the concentration of Lewis acid sites. This carbon is non reactive and may cover the Pt particles causing catalyst deactivation. Hence, the combination of Pt with a support low in acid sites, such as ZrO, is well suited for long term stable operation. For non-noble metals such as Ni, the rate of CH4 dissociation exceeds the rate of oxidation drastically and carbon forms rapidly on the metal in the form of filaments. The rate of carbon filament formation is proportional to the particle size of Ni Below a critical Ni particle size (d<2 nm), formation of carbon slowed down dramatically Well dispersed Ni supported on ZrO is thus a viable alternative to the noble metal based materials. [Pg.463]

X. H. Ren, M. Bertmer, H. Kuhn, S. Stapf, D. E. Demco, B. Blumich, C. Kem, A. Jess 2002, ( H, 13C and 129Xe NMR study of changing pore size and tortuosity during deactivation and decoking of a naphtha reforming catalyst), NATO Sci. Ser. ITMath., Phys. Chem. 7b, 603. [Pg.282]


See other pages where Deactivation reforming is mentioned: [Pg.223]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.1954]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.1954]    [Pg.584]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.2097]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.617]    [Pg.653]    [Pg.685]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.86]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.253 ]




SEARCH



Catalytic reforming deactivation

Deactivation and Regeneration of a Reforming Catalyst

Reforming kinetics deactivation

© 2024 chempedia.info