Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Currents quarks

Abstract. Low-momentum quark determinant and effective action in the presence of current quark mass and external flavor fields is derived. The results of the calculations of various correlators are briefly presented. We conclude that, this approach is a reliable tool for the hadron physics, especially including strange quarks. [Pg.256]

In detyB we observe the competition between current mass m and overlapping matrix element a p2R 3. With typical instanton sizes p 1/3 fm and inter-instanton distances R 1/to, a is of the order of the strange current quark mass, ms = 150 MeV. So in this case it is very important to take properly into account the current quark mass. [Pg.259]

Within this approach it was proposed so called improved effective action which is more properly takes into account current quark masses and satisfies axial-anomaly low energy theorems also beyond the chiral limit (M.M. Musakhanov, 1999) at least at 0(m). [Pg.259]

In the present work we refine the calculations Diow and derive the QCD low-energy effective action not only with an account of current quark masses but also other external V = v + 075 + s + >75 fields, where v = a = 7v and a are vector and axial fields, s... [Pg.259]

In Eq. (37) soft external and a fields, carrying momentum q p l. were assumed. Then, they are present inside of the form-factor F in above mentioned form. If v, a external fields are flavor matrices then form-factor F also becomes matrix Nf x Nf. So, we get the partition function Z[m,V], where W are multi-quark interaction terms in the presence of current quark mass m and external fields V. [Pg.265]

Figure 2. Solutions of the chiral gap and the diquark gap A for the Gaussian model form-factor in the chiral limit (left panel) and for finite current quark mass mo = 2.41 MeV (right panel) at different temperatures T = 0,20,40 MeV for symmetric quark matter and G2 = 0.75 Gi. Figure 2. Solutions of the chiral gap <j> and the diquark gap A for the Gaussian model form-factor in the chiral limit (left panel) and for finite current quark mass mo = 2.41 MeV (right panel) at different temperatures T = 0,20,40 MeV for symmetric quark matter and G2 = 0.75 Gi.
We compare results in the chiral limit (mo = 0) with those for finite current quark mass mo = 2.41 MeV and observe that the diquark gap is not sensitive to the presence of the current quark mass, which holds for all form-factors However, the choice of the form-factor influences the critical values of the phase transition as displayed in the quark matter phase diagram (/j,q — T plane) of Fig. 2, see also Fig. 1. A softer form-factor in momentum space gives lower critical values for Tc and at the borders of chiral symmetry restoration and diquark condensation. [Pg.346]

The U-, d-, and s-quark masses are estimates of so-called current-quark masses, in a mass-independent subtraction scheme such as MS at a scale /r 2 GeV. The c-and 6-quark masses are the running masses in the MS scheme. For the 6-quark we also quote the IS mass. These can be different from the heavy quark masses obtained in potential models. [Pg.1746]

The effect was first mentioned by Goldhaber and Sternheimer [109], who speculated on the fine and hyperfine structure of exotic atoms consisting of an atomic nucleus and an fl . The splitting pattern would provide a measurement of the quadrupole moment as well as the magnetic moment of the ft . In ref. [109], a quadrupole moment Q = fm was assumed for numerical illustration, on the grounds that the has a mass comparable to that of the deuteron and hence might also have Q of the same order of magnitude. In fact much smaller values of Q are obtained from current quark models [108,110]. [Pg.71]

We see that B is the extension of Lee-Bardeen s matrix B, taking into account the presence of the external fields V and with an account of the quark current mass m without making expansion over current mass m and also extended to a few flavors case. [Pg.263]

The saddle-point equation leads to the momentum dependent dynamical quark mass Mf(k) = MfF2(k). Mf here is a function of current mass mf (M.M. Musakhanov, 2002). It was found that that M[m] is a decreasing function and for the strange quark with ms = 0.15 GeV Ms 0.5 Mu>d. This result in a good correspondence with (P. Pobylitsa, 1989), where another method was completely applied - direct sum is of planar diagrams. [Pg.266]

The results obtained with a purely baryonic EOS call for an estimate of the effects due to the hypothetical presence of quark matter in the interior of the neutron star. Unfortunately, the current theoretical description of quark matter is burdened with large uncertainties, seriously limiting the predictive power of any theoretical approach at high baryonic density. For the time being we can therefore only resort to phenomenological models for the quark matter EOS and try to constrain them as well as possible by the few experimental information on high density baryonic matter. [Pg.127]

Figure 12. Kepler period versus the rotational mass for purely hadronic stars as well as hybrid stars. The following core compositions are considered i) nucleons and leptons (dotted line) ii) nucleons, hyperons, and leptons (dashed line) in) hadrons, quarks, and leptons (solid line). The shaded area represents the current range of observed data. Figure 12. Kepler period versus the rotational mass for purely hadronic stars as well as hybrid stars. The following core compositions are considered i) nucleons and leptons (dotted line) ii) nucleons, hyperons, and leptons (dashed line) in) hadrons, quarks, and leptons (solid line). The shaded area represents the current range of observed data.
The value of the maximum mass of neutron stars obtained according to our analysis appears rather robust with respect to the uncertainties of the nuclear and the quark matter EOS. Therefore, the experimental observation of a very heavy (M > 1.6M ) neutron star, as claimed recently by some groups [41] (M ss 2.2 M ), if confirmed, would suggest that either serious problems are present for the current theoretical modelling of the high-density phase of nuclear matter, or that the assumptions about the phase transition between hadron and quark phase are substantially wrong. In both cases, one can expect a well defined hint on the high density nuclear matter EOS. [Pg.132]

Now, let us consider the divergence of axial currents in HDET, which is related to the axial anomaly and also to how the quark matter responds to external axial-current sources like electroweak probes. [Pg.171]

Here To = y 11/ is proportional to the unit matrix in flavor space. The quark field ip now contains a third component in flavor space, the strange quark, and consequently the mass matrix rh, see Eq. (4), is equally enlarged by the current strange quark mass, ms, which can in general be different from up and down quark masses. This interaction consists of a U(3)l x U(3)ft-syrnmetric 4-point interaction and a 7 Hooft-type 6-point interaction which breaks the UA (1) symmetry. [Pg.195]

In reality, we are more interested in the intermediate density region, where the color superconducting phase may exist in the interior of neutron stars or may be created in heavy ion collisions. Unfortunately, we have little knowledge about this region we are not sure how the deconfinement and the chiral restoration phase transitions happen, how the QCD coupling constant evolves and how the strange quark behaves in dense matter, etc. Primarily, our current... [Pg.225]

The effect of thermal pion fluctuations on the specific heat and the neutrino emissivity of neutron stars was discussed in [27, 28] together with other in-medium effects, see also reviews [29, 30], Neutron pair breaking and formation (PBF) neutrino process on the neutral current was studied in [31, 32] for the hadron matter. Also ref. [32] added the proton PBF process in the hadron matter and correlation processes, and ref. [33] included quark PBF processes in quark matter. PBF processes were studied by two different methods with the help of Bogolubov transformation for the fermion wave function [31, 33] and within Schwinger-Kadanoff-Baym-Keldysh formalism for nonequilibrium normal and anomalous fermion Green functions [32, 28, 29],... [Pg.291]

Since the discovery of the parton substructure of nucleons and its interpretation within the constituent quark model, much effort has been spent to explain the properties of these particles and the structure of high density phases of matter is under current experimental investigation in heavy-ion collisions [17]. While the diagnostics of a phase transition in experiments with heavy-ion beams faces the problems of strong non-equilibrium and finite size, the dense matter in a compact star forms a macroscopic system in thermal and chemical equilibrium for which effects signalling a phase transition shall be most pronounced [8],... [Pg.416]

One property that remains in the current concept of atom is discreteness. If anything, evidence for the particulate nature of matter has continued to accumulate over that time, notwithstanding the fact that particles can display wavelike phenomena such as diffraction and regardless of their ultimate nature (quarks multidimensional strings something else ). [Pg.9]

At this primitive stage of development of current algebra quarks had not yet appeared on the scene. [Pg.23]


See other pages where Currents quarks is mentioned: [Pg.128]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.202]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.163 ]




SEARCH



Current matrix elements in the quark-parton model

Quark masses current

Quarks

© 2024 chempedia.info