Crevice corrosion critical potentials, measurement

The anodic polarization curve for a specimen with an active crevice will be in principle as shown in Figure 7.17. In this case a very small free external surface is assumed, and any internal hydrogen reduction is disregarded. is the potential as measured with the reference electrode positioned outside the crevice. As explained above, the real potential in the crevice, Ei , is more negative. The lower limit for corrosion in an active crevice is the protection (or repassivation) potential Epr. However, the critical potential that must be exceeded for initiation of the ereviee corrosion process, the crevice corrosion initiation potential, is higher than the protection potential. 

Evidence of localized corrosion can be obtained from polarization methods such as potentiodynamic polarization, EIS, and electrochemical noise measurements, which are particularly well suited to providing data on localized corrosion. When evidence of localized attack is obtained, the engineer needs to perform a careful analysis of the conditions that may lead to such attack. Correlation with process conditions can provide additional data about the susceptibility of the equipment to locaHzed attack and can potentially help prevent failures due to pitting or crevice corrosion. Since pitting may have a delayed initiation phase, careful consideration of the cause of the localized attack is critical. Laboratory testing and involvement of an... 

It is in fact the acidification of the occluded crevice solution that triggers the crevice corrosion. The critical acid concentration, < , , for crevice corrosion to occur corresponds to what we call the passivation-depassivation pH, beyond which the metal spontaneously passivates. This critical acidity determines the crevice passivation-depassivation potential, and hence the crevice protection potential Ecrev. The electrode potential actually measured consists of the crevice passivation-depassivation potential, E -ev, and the IR drop, A/iIR, due to the ion migration through the crevice. Assuming the diffusion current from the crevice bottom to the solution outside, we obtain AEm = icmv x h constant, where crcv is the diffusion-controlled metal dissolution current density at the crevice bottom and h is the crevice depth [62], Since anodic metal dissolution at the crevice bottom follows a Tafel relation, we obtain Eciev as a logarithmic function of the crevice depth ... 

Critical potentials axe important in determining the resistance of a mefed to localized corrosion because they have a mechanistic underpinning and they are rapid measurements. Two potentials have been used as a measure of the crevice corrosion resistance—crevice/pit initiation potential (Ee or Ep) and crevice/pit repassivation potential (Ei ev or E ). The E or Ep is the potential at which the current... 

The materials Monit and Sea-Cure are characterised by good resistance to pitting, crevice and stress corrosion cracking in seawater. The critical pitting corrosion temperature in the FeCls test is 328 K (55 °C) and the critical crevice corrosion temperature is 318 K (45 °C). In Table 36, the pitting potentials of the two superferrites and the austenitic steels 1.4539 (SAE 904 L, XlNiCrMoCu25-20-5) and X3CrNiMol7-13-3 (SAE 316,1.4436) measured in 5% NaCl solution are presented. 

Experimental studies usually yield good agreement between the rates of corrosion obtained from polarization resistance measurements and those derived from weight-loss data, particularly if we recall that the Tafel slopes for the anodic and the cathodic processes may not be known very accurately. It cannot be overemphasized, however, that both methods yield the average rate of corrosion of the sample, which may not be the most critical aspect when localized corrosion occurs. In particular it should be noted that at the open-circuit corrosion potential, the total anodic and cathodic currents must be equal, while the local current densities on the surface can be quite different. This could be a serious problem when most of the surface acts as the cathode and small spots (e.g., pits or crevices) act as the anodic regions. The rate of anodic dissolution inside a pit can, under these circumstances, be hundreds or even thousands of times faster than the average corrosion rate obtained from micro polarization or weight-loss measurements. 

A somewhat alternative analysis of pitting attributes pit initiation to the activation of defects in the passive film, defects such as those induced during film growth or those induced mechanically due to scratching or stress. The pit behavior is analyzed in terms of the product, xi, a parameter in which x is the pit or crevice depth (cm), and i is the corrosion current density (A/cm2) at the bottom of the pit (Ref 21). Experimental measurements confirm that, for many metal/environment systems, the active corrosion current density in a pit is of the order of 1 A/cm2. Therefore, numerical values for xi may be visualized as a pit depth in centimeters. A defect becomes a pit if the pH in the pit becomes sufficiently low to prevent maintaining the protective oxide film. Establishing the critical pH, for a specific oxide, will depend on the depth (metal ions trapped by diffiisional constraints), the current density (rate of generation of metal ions) and the external pH. In turn, the current density will be determined by the local electrochemical potential established by corrosion currents to the passive external cathodic surface or by a potentiostat. Once the critical condition for dissolution of the oxide has been reached, the pit becomes deeper and develops a still lower pH by further hydrolysis. 

---