Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Cracking failure adhesion

Major causes for coating failure are surface cracking and undetected pinholes or voids. These can be repaired and serious problems avoided. Coatings generally fail in different modes, these are chemical failure, abrasion failure, adhesive failure, cohesive failure and undercoat corrosion. For performance evaluation of coatings on experimental basis on these parameters various ASTM and BS specifications are presently being used. [Pg.197]

Fabric separation failure occurs when the belt teeth and fabric land become detached from the belt cords [17] and is essentially seen as purely an adhesion failure, although there may be links between this failure mode and the tooth root cracking failures observed by lizuka [18], originating from cracks developed in the cord itself through internal delamination. Wear causes belt failure through changing the tooth profile to such an extent that the belt teeth can no longer support the required load [25]. [Pg.342]

Eor both failure modes of cracking and adhesion, when weathering studies are conducted in the laboratory, exposure is reported in kilojoules per square meter at a specified wavelength. When weathering studies are conducted in the field, exposure is reported in years. [Pg.99]

In most cases, failure cracks arise in the weak bormdary layers. Bikerman distinguished many groups of weak boundary layers according to their origin. Similar to the formation of the adhesion joint, three phases usually participate in failure adhesive, substrate and air (or other medium). Various admixtru-es form a weak boundary layer, being concentrated at the phase border. The defects in the structure of the substrate and adhesive and admixtures determine... [Pg.84]

Fracture mechanics (qv) affect adhesion. Fractures can result from imperfections in a coating film which act to concentrate stresses. In some cases, stress concentration results in the propagation of a crack through the film, leading to cohesive failure with less total stress appHcation. Propagating cracks can proceed to the coating/substrate interface, then the coating may peel off the interface, which may require much less force than a normal force pull would require. [Pg.347]

Micro-mechanical processes that control the adhesion and fracture of elastomeric polymers occur at two different size scales. On the size scale of the chain the failure is by breakage of Van der Waals attraction, chain pull-out or by chain scission. The viscoelastic deformation in which most of the energy is dissipated occurs at a larger size scale but is controlled by the processes that occur on the scale of a chain. The situation is, in principle, very similar to that of glassy polymers except that crack growth rate and temperature dependence of the micromechanical processes are very important. [Pg.236]

In-service issues. As mentioned previously, many early service failures of bonded structure were due to adherend surface treatments that were unstable in long-term exposure to water. A majority of these problems were resolved by the adoption of surface treatments such as chromic and phosphoric acid anodize for aluminum details. The remaining few were alleviated by the adoption of phosphoric acid anodized honeycomb core and foaming adhesives resistant to water passage. Other service durability issues such as the cracking of brittle potting compound used to seal honeycomb sandwich assemblies, and subsequent delamination, have been minor in scope. [Pg.1170]

The failure of systems with dispersed fillers (exemplified by polystyrene plus glass spheres with different treatment) was studied by subjecting specimens to deformation in the microscope field [255,256]. Where adhesion was good the cracks were observed to be formed near the glass sphere pole, in regions corresponding to the maximum deformation, where adhesion was poor, anywhere between the pole and the equator. It was discovered that microcracks began to... [Pg.36]

The physical properties of automotive enamels are in large part determined by the crosslink structure developed in the paint films during the baking process. Enamels which are not cured sufficiently (undercured) are generally sensitive to humidity and solvents. In addition, they may be prone to chipping and cold cracking. Faints which have been baked excessively (overcured) exhibit intercoat adhesion failure. That is, subsequent coats... [Pg.256]

Poor adhesion of membrane to metal is the leading cause of failure in solid-state potentiometric sensors [116], For glass membranes, the mismatch of thermal coefficients of expansion between thin glass membrane and metal (mostly Pt) has been attributed to premature failure due to hairline crack formations in the glass layer [60], For polymer-based membranes, water vapor penetration was reported to compromise the membrane-metal interface, therefore affecting the sensor s performance. [Pg.304]


See other pages where Cracking failure adhesion is mentioned: [Pg.399]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.578]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.773]    [Pg.983]    [Pg.989]    [Pg.667]    [Pg.1334]    [Pg.1335]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.34]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.103 ]




SEARCH



Adhesion adhesive failure

Adhesive cracking

Adhesive failure

© 2024 chempedia.info