Courant limit

C. Deslouis, I. Epelboin, C. Gabrielli, and B. Tribollet, "Impedance Elec-trom canique obtenue au Courant Limite de Diffusion a Partir d lme Modulation Sinusoidale de la Vitesse de Rotation d une Electrode a Disque," Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 82 (1977) 251-269. 

The properties of techniques (2.26)-(2.29), and (2.31) are, indeed, quite instructive. Their amplitude errors are less than the phase ones, for any wavenumber. Moreover, time integration generates drastically smaller errors than the spatial discretization, and so allowing the phase discrepancies to be independent of the Courant limit. The above schemes are able to perform even when propagation direction is not aligned with the mesh axes. 

ADI-FDTD realizations is displayed. Recall that the CFLN is defined as CFLN = At/A/max, with A/max the maximum time-step denoted via the stability criterion of the second-order or higher order nonstandard FDTD method. As can be deduced, the superiority of (6.35) is more prominent when time-steps exceed the Courant limit at a great extent (CFLN > 20). On the other hand, the dispersion error of the improved algorithm is very small even for very coarse grids, whereas its normalized phase velocity is notably close to the free-space one, despite the fact that the Courant limit is greatly surpassed. 

The preceding criterion is known as the Courant limit. For example, for our application of the upwind scheme discussed above, At < 0.1s must be used to ensure stability of the solution. 

Correlation coefficients, 1260 Coulomb forces, 669-671 Courant limit, 1233 Ciank.-Micholson algorithm, 1229 Creeping Eow, 461 Cresol, 280... 

Since the Courant limit is controlled by both the length of the volume and fluid velocity, higher velocities, such as those seen in gas Brayton cycles, exacerbate the increase in problem run time. The parallel Brayton system model used in this study includes four coimter flow heat exchangers. In order to approach the analytically determined gas state points, it was necessary to model each heat exchanger with 80 control volumes. This resulted in a Courant hmit of approximately 0.5 milliseconds and problems that tan roughly 25 times slower than real time on the super computers used by the Naval Nuclear Program. Since most of the initial scoping jobs require 1000 seconds of problem run time, these jobs would take almost 7 hours to run. 

Using the staggered heat structure mesh, it was possible to decrease the fluid volume nodalization in the Prometheus coimter flow heat exchanger models from 80 to 20 control volumes increasing the Courant limit by a factor of four and eliminating the differential temperature error across the heat exchanger. 

All the methods have a limit to the time step that is set by the convection term. Essentially, the time step should not be so big as to take the material farther than it can go at its velocity. This is usually expressed as a Courant number limitation. 

In a backwards-in-distance solution for advective transport in the absence of dispersion or diffusion, the Courant criterion limits the time step. In one dimension, the grid Courant number is the number of nodal blocks the fluid traverses over a time step. By the Courant criterion, the Courant number Co must not exceed one, or... 

The main limitation of FDTD is the need for computer memory and runtime, dominantly. The Courant criterion limits the time step of FDTD in order to ensure numerical stability. 

The problem of Example 7.3 will again be solved with explicit and implicit exponential differences, and compared with the analytical solution, equation (E7.4.7). This solution is given in Figure E7.5.1. Note that the explicit solution is close to the analytical solution, but at a Courant number of 0.5, whereas the implicit solution could solve the problem with less accuracy at a Courant number of 5. In addition, the diffusion number of the explicit solution was 0.4, below the limit of Di < 0.5. The implicit solution does not need to meet this criteria and had Di = 4. 

Second method consists of a straightforward discretization method first order (Euler) explicit in time and finite differences in space. Both the time step and the grid size are kept constant and satisfying the Courant Friedrichs Lewy (CFL) condition to ensure the stability of the calculations. To deal with the transport part we have considered the minmod slope limiting method based on the first order upwind flux and the higher order Richtmyer scheme (see, e.g. Quarteroni and Valli, 1994, Chapter 14). We call this method SlopeLimit. 

A practical limitation of the Eulerian schemes is that the convergence of the numerical integration is achieved only if the adopted timestep At < CAx/u, where the constant C is generally equal to unity. This criterion, called the Courant-Fredrichs-Lewy (CFL) condition, imposes timesteps that are generally much smaller than the physical timescales of interest. 

The stability analysis of the dispersion-correction numerical scheme shows that the stability criterion is < 0.67 and —0.125 < 7 < 0.083, where C/ is the Courant number. The lower limit of 7 imposes a limitation on the ratio of grid size to water depth as 1.27. This means that the uniform grid size greater than approximately 1.27 times of a local water depth must be employed for the stability of the present dispersion-correction scheme. To satisfy the stability criterion of the dispersion-correction finite-difference model, the range of applicable water depth is limited if a uniform grid size is used for varying water depth. For practical purposes, this stability criterion can be solved by imposing intentionally a limitation on the... 

The finite element implementation is based on the principle of virtual work. Since the capture of the dynamic fracture process requires very small time steps, an explicit central difference time stepping scheme is used in this investigation, with the time step size A/ chosen as 4% of the limiting (Courant) value. 

The advection of coolant in a time step is limited below one-third of the mesh size, which means that the Courant number is below one-third. The diffusion in a time step is limited below one-third of the mesh size, which means that the diffusion number is below one-third. 

---