Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Couplings comparisons

Chanson M, Meda P Rat pancreatic acinar cell coupling Comparison of extent and modulation in vitro and in vivo in Hall JE, Zampighi GA, Davies RM (eds) Gap Junctions. Progress in Cell Research, vol 3. Amsteradam, Elsevier, 1993, pp 199-205. [Pg.123]

From the direction cosines associated with each coupling, comparisons can be made with specific molecular directions known from the x-ray crystal structure, in particular enabling the identification of the major sites of unpaired spin density. Examples of studies to obtain free radical assignments are included. [Pg.500]

This is strikingly illustrated by the data collected by Lindberg and Runnells (1984), some of which are summarized in Figure 12.5 These authors examined over 150 000 groundwater analyses from the USGS database, plus values from the literature, from which they selected 611 analyses of acceptable quality. The ionic species activities were then calculated (this speciation modeling is discussed in Chapters 16 and 18) and theoretical Eh values calculated for several redox couples. Comparison with the measured Eh illustrates how unreliable these measurements are. [Pg.352]

The small dimensions in microreactors imply the presence of laminar flow. This type of flow makes it easier to extract chemical kinetic parameters and fully characterize phenomena. The correct incorporation of the active catalyst onto the surface of the membrane is one of the important aspects of catalytic microreactors. Drott et al. (1997) investigated the use of porous silicon as a carrier matrix in microstructured enzyme reactors. The matrix was created by anodization and the fabrication of the microreactor used flow-through silicon cell comprising 32 channels of 50 pm wide, 250 pm deep and separated by 50 pm. The aim was to increase the surface area on which the enzymes (glucose oxidase) could be coupled. Comparisons were made with the classical non-porous reference device and the glucose turnover rates. The results showed that when compared with the reference reactor the enzyme activity increased 100-fold. [Pg.44]

Nonadiabaticity can, in principle, be revealed by deviations from the Marcus cross relation, if the three reactions involved are affected to different extents. In particular, it has been suggested that if reactions of a series of, say, oxidants with a common reductant B are all slightly nonadiabatic, then the self-exchange reaction which is included in the series (the case where A = B) will be favored, since in that case the donor and acceptor orbitals are strictly identical. Free-energy plots suggest that this may indeed be the case for [Co(sep)] and [Fe(H20)6], and for the iron couple, comparisons of self-exchange rates with electrochemical rates have shown a similar anomaly. In all cases the effects are small, and other explanations cannot be ruled out. Indeed, Hupp and Weaver prefer to postulate a special mechanism for the reaction, such as bridging... [Pg.9]

Reduction of O3 by [IrClg] , shown in Eq. (4), is first-order in both reactants and has a second-order rate constant of 1.7x 10 s" at 25.0 °C. ° The initial electron transfer is outer-sphere in nature and allows computation of a self-exchange rate of 4M s for the 03/Of couple. Comparisons of this rate constant with the results of other electron transfer reactions of O3 reveal that inner-sphere mechanisms are common. [Pg.34]

The CIDNP spectrum is shown in figure B 1.16.1 from the introduction, top trace, while a dark spectrum is shown for comparison in figure B 1.16.1 bottom trace. Because the sign and magnitude of the hyperfine coupling constant can be a measure of the spin density on a carbon, Roth et aJ [10] were able to use the... [Pg.1601]

An equivalent foiiti of Eq. (31) can be obtained by inserting Eq. (30) into Eq. (15). Comparison of the result with Eq. (31) furnishes the following relations between the adiabatic and diabatic coupling matrices... [Pg.190]

Other studies have also been made on the dynamics around a conical intersection in a model 2D system, both for dissociahve [225] and bound-state [226] problems. Comparison between surface hopping and exact calculations show reasonable agreement when the coupling between the surfaces is weak, but larger errors are found in the shong coupling limit. [Pg.298]

QCMD describes a coupling of the fast motions of a quantum particle to the slow motions of a classical particle. In order to classify the types of coupled motion we eventually have to deal with, we first analyze the case of an extremely heavy classical particle, i.e., the limit M —> oo or, better, m/M 0. In this adiabatic limit , the classical motion is so slow in comparison with the quantal motion that it cannot induce an excitation of the quantum system. That means, that the populations 6k t) = of the... [Pg.398]

Special Types. Many other coupling types are available. These vary ia degree of complexity, maintenance time, torque capabiUties, and price. A good comparison study on coupling is available (36). An elastomer-type coupling is one of the most popular types used, particularly ia the chemical iadustry. [Pg.299]

A detailed comparison of spectral data concluded that bora2iae has a delocali2ed TT-electron system like that of ben2ene (112) other workers, however, have concluded from spia-coupled calculations that bora2iae has Htde aromatic stabili2ation as compared to ben2ene (113). [Pg.266]


See other pages where Couplings comparisons is mentioned: [Pg.183]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.841]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.894]    [Pg.1059]    [Pg.1450]    [Pg.1496]    [Pg.1557]    [Pg.1569]    [Pg.2222]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.603]    [Pg.603]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.16]   


SEARCH



Comparison between Chemical Shifts and Coupling Constants

© 2024 chempedia.info