Coulombic repulsive effects

In ab initio theory, ECPs are considerably more complex. They properly represent not only Coulomb repulsion effects, but also adherence to the Pauli principle (i.e., outlying atomic orbitals must be orthogonal to core orbitals having the same angular momentum). This being said, we will not dwell on the technical aspects of their construction. Interested readers are referred to the bibliography at the end of the chapter. 

The ground-state electronic structure of As, as with all Group 15 elements features 3 unpaired electrons ns np there is a substantial electron affinity for the acquisition of 1 electron but further additions must be effected against considerable coulombic repulsion, and the formation of As is highly endothermic. Consistent with this there are no ionic compounds containing the arsenide ion and... 

It is clear that, for electrons with parallel spins, the auxiliary condition (Eq. II.2) gives rise to a correlation effect which very closely resembles the correlation effect coming from the Coulomb repulsion in the Hamiltonian for = 2 the Fermi hole replaces to a certain degree the Coulomb hole. This means that, if... 

Dicarbonyl functions have been built into macrocyclic structures, and pKa values for the resulting macrocycles [60] have been determined (Alberts and Cram, 1979). When the open-chain model [62] is compared with the macrocycles [60], identical first pK values were found (pKa = 8.6). Thus for the diketones [60], no macrocyclic effect is noticeable. But for the dissociation of a second proton from the mono-aniorts of [60] much higher pKa values are found. To a certain extent. Coulomb repulsions (see Section 2) are probably the reason for this behaviour, but the large difference in the pKa values (ApKa = 2.9, see Table 26) argues for a special stabilization of the mono-anion. Again hydrogen bonds are not unreasonable. 

The coulombic force is proportional to the square of the effective charge on the polyion, i.e. n], (The effective charge is equivalent to the number of free counterions, ,.) When the charge along the polyion, Q, is small the extensive forces involved are those of purely coulombic repulsion. 

Here the indices a and b stand for the valence orbitals on the two atoms as before, n is a number operator, c+ and c are creation and annihilation operators, and cr is the spin index. The third and fourth terms in the parentheses effect electron exchange and are responsible for the bonding between the two atoms, while the last two terms stand for the Coulomb repulsion between electrons of opposite spin on the same orbital. As is common in tight binding theory, we assume that the two orbitals a and b are orthogonal we shall correct for this neglect of overlap later. The coupling Vab can be taken as real we set Vab = P < 0. 

However, billiard balls are a pretty bad model for electrons. First of all, as discussed above, electrons are fermions and therefore have an antisymmetric wave function. Second, they are charged particles and interact through the Coulomb repulsion they try to stay away from each other as much as possible. Both of these properties heavily influence the pair density and we will now enter an in-depth discussion of these effects. Let us begin with an exposition of the consequences of the antisymmetry of the wave function. This is most easily done if we introduce the concept of the reduced density matrix for two electrons, which we call y2. This is a simple generalization of p2(x1 x2) given above according to... 

So far as steric effects are concerned, the least energy-demanding direction of approach by the nucleophile to the carbonyl carbon atom will be from above, or below, the substantially planar carbonyl compound. It is also likely to be from slightly to the rear of the carbon atom (cf. 12), because of potential coulombic repulsion between the approaching nucleophile and the high electron density at the carbonyl oxygen atom ... 

From the point of view of ESR spectroscopy, the distinction between molecules with one unpaired electron and those with more than one lies in the fact that electrons interact with one another these interactions lead to additional terms in the spin Hamiltonian and additional features in the ESR spectrum. The most important electron electron interaction is coulombic repulsion with two unpaired electrons, repulsion leads to the singlet-triplet splitting. As we will see, this effect can be modeled by adding a term, JS St, to the spin Hamiltonian,... 

In this context it is noteworthy to refer to the unsaturated analogue l,2-di(9-anthryl)ethene [32] (Weitzel and Mullen, 1990 Weitzel et al., 1990). Like [6] (Becker et al., 1991), compound [32] forms a stable dianion and tetra-anion upon reduction. In the cyclic voltammogram of [32], the first two electrons are transferred at nearly the same potential, pointing to an effective minimization of the Coulombic repulsion between the charged anthryl units (Bohnen et al, 1992). This situation, which again corresponds to that in [6], could imply a torsion about the central olefinic bond (Bock et al., 1989). 

Chandler, R. E. Houtepen, A. J. Nelson, J. Vanmaekelbergh D. 2007. Electron transport in quantum dot solids Monte Carlo simulations of the effects of shell filling, Coulomb repulsions, and site disorder. Phys. Rev. B 75 085325-085335. 

Technically, the time-independent Schrodinger equation (2) is solved for clamped nuclei. The Hamiltonian is broken into its electronic part, He, including the nuclear Coulomb repulsion energy, and the nuclear Hamiltonian HN. At this level, mass polarization effects are usually neglected. The wave function is therefore factorized as usual (r,X)= vP(r X)g(X). Formally, the electronic wave function d lnX) and total electronic energy, E(X), are obtained after solving the equation for each value of X ... 

---