Flammability test cotton

Fiber blending is a very common method of reducing the flammability of flammable fibers. Polyester is usually blended with cotton and this polycotton, if has lower than 50% polyester content can pass the simple vertical strip flammability test. With higher polyester content, sometimes the blended fiber is more flammable than the individual components. This is called wicking effect where the cotton acts like a wick, holding the polyester component together, which bums. Cotton-nylon blend are also quite commonly used to reduce flammability of cotton. 

Flammability Test. Flammability of the samples was evaluated by two methods using cotton fabrics. Cotton fabrics were treated in the same way as cotton fibers. Oxygen index of the samples was measured according to the JIS K 7201 procedure. Another method... 

Our experience here has been typified by the funding of a research consortia to carry out flammability testing with respect to cotton, polyester, blends in apparel and clothing where the consortia directed the activity in a more coherent and desirable fashion than would a research program directed by single segment of the community such as the university or the business firms. 

Flammability Tests Burning wool smells like burnt horn, burning silk smells like burnt egg-white, and burning cellulose fiber smells like burnt paper. Polyamide and polyester fibers melt before they burn polyacrylonitrile fibers, upon burning, leave a residue of hard, black spherical particles. On heating the dry fibers in a test tube, wool, silk, and polyamides develop alkaline vapors, while cotton, bast fibers, and regenerated cellulose (rayon) develop acidic vapors (test with moistened universal indicator paper). 

A similar but vertical flammability test with a 450 x 120 mm specimen conditioned and located in the same way is comprised in DIN 54 336-1986. Two cotton thread... 

Although certain cellulose esters, such as the ammonium salt of phospho-rylated cotton and cellulose phosphate [9015-14-9], are flame-resistant, the attachment of most currently used durable polymeric flame retardants for cotton is through ether linkage to the cellulose at a relatively low degree of substitution (DS). Nondurable flame retardants based on liquid-or vapor-phase applications of boric acid [10043-35-3] or methyl borate [121-43-7] are used in treatment of cotton batting for upholstery, bedding, and automotive cushions (112-114). Cotton carpet materials will pass the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) federal flammability test for carpets (16 CFR1630) when cross-hnked with polycarboxylic acids such as 1,2,3,4-butanetetracarboxylic acid or citric acid with sodium phosphate, sodium hypophosphite, sodium bicarbonate, or sodium carbonate catalysis (115). 

Cold cure" or high resilience PU foams tended to liquify before igniting were developed and gave good results in standard tests such as BS 4735(25) (similar to the discontinued ASTM D1692) but could still burn when used with flammable fabrics in furniture (Table IV). However they have been used most successfully in the UK in combination with flame retarded cotton interliners and fabrics of low flammability e.g. wool, nylon, FR cotton etc. and formed the basis of public area furniture used in the UK since the early 1970 s (Table V). 

In 1973, the U.S. Department of Commerce promulgated Flammability Standard FF4-72. This Act requires all mattresses to pass a cigarette smoldering test. Boric acid (12-14 wt.% loading) in conjunction with a dust control agent (1 wt.% of paraffinic oil) is normally used in the cotton batting to pass the test. 

Many durable flame retardants for cotton have been developed to convey open-flame resistance [344,346,360,361]. The vertical flame test for determining the U.S. children s sleep-wear flammability (16 CFR 1615 and 1616) is a rather severe test and cotton fabrics require a FR treatment to pass the test. The test method requires treatments that are durable to 50 hot water wash and dry cycles. Currently there are relatively few commercially available FR chemistries that are durable under these conditions required today. Some of the reasons include low commercial availability of the chemicals, costs, safety concerns, process control issues, and difficulty in application. 

The burn results for polymers 15 and 19 show that the polymers are inherently flame retardant with low base flammability (Table 4). The polymer dripped but did not ignite the cotton when it was subjected to the UL-94 flame test, and with the addition of 1 wt% PTFE, it did not drip. The PCFC results show that these polymers have a high heat release capacity when compared with the BPC carbonates and aryl ethers, but it is still significantly less than that of the base commodity polymers, such as polyethylene or polystyrene (Table 5). 

In Canada, the flammability of mattresses is tested with a single glowing cigarette. The mattress passes the test if extension of carbonization is not more than 50 mm and no burning phenomenon is observed 10 min after the extinction of the cigarette. Experience shows that most cotton felt mattresses in Canada meet these requirements unless the cotton felt is in direct contact with the external cover. Since the thin (<150 g/m ) permanently attached ticking on the mattress is not susceptible to glowing, the above requirements are reasonable. ... 

Flammability The flammability of a plastic is most commonly characterised by the Underwriters Laboratory (UL 94) horizontal burning test. The test sample, a rectangular bar 127 mm long, is held horizontally, or at 45°, and clamped at one end. The burning speed of the bar is measured when exposed to a pilot flame. The bar is held 305 mm above the surface of a layer of surgical cotton. The thickness of the bar can be varied, but is quoted as part of the result, e.g. VO, 1.57. The commonly quoted ratings given to a material are ... 

---