Core electrons, definition

Core electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis (ESCA) is perhaps the most definitive technique applied to the differentiation between nonclassical carbocations from equilibrating classical species. The time scale of the measured ionization process is of the order of 10 16 s so that definite species are characterized, regardless of (much slower) intra- and intermolecular exchange reactions—for example, hydride shifts, Wagner-Meerwein rearrangements, proton exchange, and so on. 

Recently many quantum chemists have dedicated a lot of elforts to the calculation and treatment of the electronic structures of polyatomic systems including heavy elements, which are involved in many interesting chemical and physical phenomena. They still present unique difficulties to the theoretical study. Until recently, the relativistic effect had ever been thought less important for chemical properties because the relativity appears primarily in the core electrons, which had been believed to be unlikely to affect chemically active valence regions dramatically. Recent studies, however, have revealed not only quantitatively but also quahtatively that the relativistic effect plays essential and comprehensive roles in total natures of molecular electronic structures for heavy-element systems. We are nowadays convinced that the relativistic effect is definitely important for the accurate theoretical treatment of heavy-element systems as well as the electron correlation effect. 

If we choose a definite explicit form for the core potentials of the core of atom C (which has Nc core electrons, say)... 

However, this is not surprising because Ihe actual definition of electronegativity and chemical hardness reflects the holding power wifii which the whole atom attracts valence electrons to its center. There is therefore natural that as the atom is richer in core electrons down groups lesser is the attractive force on the outer electrons from the center of the atom. In this respect, the actual scales mirror at the best the atomic stability at the valence shell. 

In view of these practical difficulties, and in order to separate the convergence problems of the perturbative approach from basic problems inherent to the effective Hamiltonians themselves, we would like to reanalyse the core-electron elimination and the reduction of the basis set in basic terms, i.e. referring to the definitions of the exact effective Hamiltonians. 

The focus of interest in homogeneously mixed valence is the 4f electron de-localization. In normal lanthanide solids (which have by definition integral lanthanide valence), the number of inner 4f electrons is integral. Moreover the 4f electrons then remain completely localized on a given lanthanide atom as all other inner core electrons there is no 4f band formation. The outer 5d6s valence electrons are delocalized conduction electrons (Wannier states of the solid). 

Recently, extensions of the core-shell definition of interpar-ticle electrical connectedness, whereby a connectivity range or shell of the order of the turmeling decay constant is defined, have been used in many analytical and simulation studies. " However, the characteristic tunneling length in various S3 tems is still difScult to predirt, as the dependence of this parameter on various factors such as the details of electrical transport in the system, and electronic and physical stmcture of the filler, as well as the properties of the host matrix are not well understood. Nevertheless, the tunneling distance is believed to be of the order of tens of angstroms and many studies select physically reasonable values within this range in their definitions of connectivity criteria. 

We have considered so far the case of free electrons. In a solid, however, there are not only the conduction electrons that can be considered as free, there are also the electrons in the core orbits. And they contribute to the dielectric constant. At frequencies the order of the plasma frequency, the contribution of the core electrons do not depend significantly on < this dependence occurs at much larger frequencies only. However, Eq. (13.50) implies that e( >optical spectra are measured at frequencies oo that, even significantly larger than ajp, stiU remain in the domain where the core contribution remains independent of m. Therefore, what the opticians call naturally e o, i-C., the value of e they measure at > > core electrons it is only at much larger frequencies that e will decreases to unity. We keep this definition of foo that is conventional, and it means that in Eq. (13.50), we have to replace 1 by Eoo-... 

The F matrix elements in eqs. (15) and (16) are formally the same as for closed-shell systems, the only difference being the definition of the density matrix in eq. (17), where the singly occupied orbital (m) has also to be taken into account. The total electronic energy (not including core-core repulsions) is given by... 

There is no clear rigorous definition of an atom in a molecule in conventional bonding models. In the Lewis model an atom in a molecule is defined as consisting of its core (nucleus and inner-shell electrons) and the valence shell electrons. But some of the valence shell electrons of each atom are considered to be shared with another atom, and how these electrons should be partitioned between the two atoms so as to describe the atoms as they exist in the molecule is not defined. 

---