1.3.5- Trioxane copolymerization

Price and McAndrew (105) have copolymerized trioxane with THF using Ph3C+SbClg as catalyst. The polymer was soluble in acetone and melted at 36-37° C. 

Up to now we have not found reaction conditions permitting exclusive production of insoluble copolymer, which is the desired product in commercial copolymerization of trioxane. Conversion of a large portion of the dioxolane into soluble copolymer could not even be avoided by slow and gradual addition of the comonomer to a homopolymerization run of trioxane in methylene dichloride (9). The same result was obtained in solution copolymerization of trioxane with 8 mole % of 1,3-dioxacycloheptane (dioxepane), and even 1,3-dioxane—which is not homopolymerizable and is a very sluggish comonomer—formed a soluble copolymer in the initial phase of copolymerization (trioxane 2.5M 1,3-dioxane 0.31M SnCb 0.025M in methylene dichloride at 30°C.). 

Polyacetal can also be stabilized against degradative conditions by copolymerizing trioxane with small amounts of ethylene oxide. This introduces a random distribution of -C-C- bonds in the polymer chain. Hydrolysis of the copolymer with aqueous alkali gives a product with stable hydroxyethyl end groups. The presence of these stable end groups coupled with the randomly distributed C-C bonds prevents polymer depolymerization at high temperature. 

Copolymer. Acetal copolymers are prepared by copolymerization of 1,3,5-trioxane with small amounts of a comonomer. Carbon-carbon bonds are distributed randomly in the polymer chain. These carbon-carbon bonds help to stabilize the polymer against thermal, oxidative, and acidic attack. 

The enthalpy of the copolymerization of trioxane is such that bulk polymerization is feasible. For production, molten trioxane, initiator, and comonomer are fed to the reactor a chain-transfer agent is in eluded if desired. Polymerization proceeds in bulk with precipitation of polymer and the reactor must supply enough shearing to continually break up the polymer bed, reduce particle size, and provide good heat transfer. The mixing requirements for the bulk polymerization of trioxane have been reviewed (22). Raw copolymer is obtained as fine emmb or flake containing imbibed formaldehyde and trioxane which are substantially removed in subsequent treatments which may be combined with removal of unstable end groups. 

Another stable polyacetal (POM Celcon) is produced by the cationic copolymerization of a mixture of trioxane and dioxolane (structure 5.23). 

Polyoxymethylene, also referred to as acetal resin or POM, is obtained either by anionic polymerization of formaldehyde or cationic ring-opening copolymerization of trioxane with a small amount of a cyclic ether or acetal (e.g., ethylene oxide or 1,3-dioxolane) [Cherdron et al., 1988 Dolce and Grates, 1985 Yamasaki et al., 2001]. The properties and uses of POM have been discussed in Sec. 5-6d. 

Cationic Copolymerization of 1,3>5-Trioxane with 1,3-Dioxolane (Ring-Opening Copolymerization)... 

The copolymerization of trioxane with cyclic ethers or formals is accomplished with cationic initiators such as boron trifluoride dibutyl etherate. Polymerization by ring opening of the six-membered ring to form high molecular weight polymer does not commence immediately upon mixing monomer and initiator. Usually, an induction period is observed during which an equilibrium concentration of formaldehyde is produced. 

Polyformaldehyde. Polyformaldehyde or polyacetal is made by two different processes. Delrin is made from formaldehyde by anionic polymerization catalyzed by a tertiary amine. The homopolymer is end-capped with acetic anhydride. Celcon is made from trioxane cationic copolymerization using boron trifluoride catalyst and ethylene oxide (2-3%) as the comonomer. Boron trifluoride is a Lewis acid that associates with trioxane and opens up the six-membered ring. Ethylene oxide provides the end capping. Without an end cap, polyformaldehyde is thermally unstable and loses formaldehyde units. 

The occurrence of a back-biting reaction is further indicated by the observation that in copolymerizations of trioxane or tetroxane with vinyl monomers various 1,3-dioxane derivatives are formed (29,56). With styrene for example, the derivative was 4-phenyl-l,3-dioxane, the formation of which was explained as follows ... 

During the initial polymerization of trioxane with (C4H9)2OBF3 in melt or solution, no solid polymer is formed, and the reaction medium remains clear. Using a high resolution NMR spectroscope, C. S. H. Chen and A. Di Edwardo observed the appearance of soluble linear polyoxy-methylene chains. In the cationic copolymerization of trioxane with 1,3-dioxolane, V. Jaacks found also that a soluble copolymer forms first and turns later into a crystalline copolymer of different composition. Crystallization and polymerization proceed simultaneously in the solid phase. 

Tn the cationic polymerization and copolymerization of trioxane in the - melt or in solution, an induction period usually exists, during which no solid polymer is formed and the reaction medium remains clear. Nevertheless, reactions are known to occur during this period. By using BF3 or an ether ate as catalyst, in homopolymerization, Kern and Jaacks (I) reported the formation of formaldehyde via depolymerization of polyoxymethylene cations. 

Figure 2. Copolymerization of trioxane with 1.5 mole % ethylene oxide in bulk at 65°C. BFS Bu2Q 1.0 X 10 s mole %...

Copolymerization with Ethylene Oxide. Figures 2-6 show the NMR spectra of copolymerization of trioxane and ethylene oxide where the... 

Table I. Assignment o New Proton Signals During the Copolymerization of Trioxane and Ethylene Oxide ...

In the copolymerization of trioxane with dioxolane, reactivity ratios of dissolved copolymer cations are quite different from those of active centers in the crystalline phase. The former strongly prefer addition of dioxolane. The difference in reactivity ratios between dissolved and precipitated active centers is attributed to the fact that in the solid phase, polymerization and crystallization of the copolymer are simultaneous. The cationic chain ends are assumed to be directly on the crystal surface. Determination of the equilibrium concentrations of formaldehyde confirms this conclusion dissolved copolymer has a higher tendency to cleave formaldehyde than crystalline polyoxymethylene. In the latter stages of copolymerization the soluble copolymer is degraded gradually to the dioxolane monomer which is incorporated into the crystalline copolymer in an almost random distribution. 

For the following reasons Mayo s conventional method for determining reactivity ratios (15) fails in copolymerizations of trioxane (9), and if the reactivity ratios were known, the same reasons would prevent calculation of copolymer compositions ... 

In the copolymerization of trioxane with dioxolane, formaldehyde may also add to copolymer cations with terminal dioxolane unit (P2+) ... 

On the other hand copolymer with a trioxane unit at the cationic chain end (Pi+) may be converted intp P2+ by cleavage of several formaldehyde units. These side reactions change the nature of the active chain ends without participation of the actual monomers trioxane and dioxo-lane. Such reactions are not provided for in the kinetic scheme of Mayo and Lewis. In their conventional scheme, conversion of Pi+ to P2+ is assumed to take place exclusively by addition of monomer M2. Polymerization of trioxane with dioxolane actually is a ternary copolymerization after the induction period one of the three monomers—formaldehyde— is present in its equilibrium concentration. Being the most reactive monomer it still exerts a strong influence on the course of copolymerization (9). This makes it impossible to apply the conventional copolymerization equation and complicates the process considerably. 

Side Reactions 2 and 3 may have similar effects (9). Tetroxane was found to be produced by a fast backbiting reaction during homo- and copolymerizations of trioxane (9). At 30°C. tetroxane reaches an equilibrium concentration of 0.1M. Furthermore, in the copolymerization of trioxane with dioxolane chain ends of the type P2 + cleave off 1,3,5-trioxe-pane (1,3,5-trioxacycloheptane) (18) to yield Pi+ (Reaction 2). Transformation of P2 + into Pi+ without monomer participation can also occur by transfer by polymer (transacetalization as in Reaction 3) ... 

In the homopolymerization of dioxolane below 30°C. tertiary oxonium ions exist exclusively (2, 5). Otherwise hydride transfer would occur (carbonium ions abstract hydride from monomeric cyclic formats) (II, 16). In trioxane polymerization, however, at least some of the active chain ends are carbonium ions they cause hydride transfer and elimination of formaldehyde (9, II, 13). Thus, in copolymerization we must expect two different kinds of structures for cationic chains with terminal trioxane unit. Oxonium ions (I) and carbonium ions (II) may have different reactivity ratios in the copolymerization, but hopefully this does not cause severe disturbance since I and II seem to be in a fast kinetic equilibrium with each other (3). Hence, we expect [I]/[II] to be constant under similar reaction conditions. 

This method is not affected by the side reactions described above. Elimination and addition of formaldehyde as well as cleavage of oxacyclic compounds and chain transfer by polymer regenerate predominantly Pi+, the desired active center. As noted above, fi is the more important reactivity ratio in copolymerizations of dioxolane with a large excess of trioxane. The value of can be determined conveniently by the de-... 

To investigate the copolymerization of trioxane with dioxolane and to determine r1 by the excess method, a molar ratio of trioxane to dioxolane of 100 1.8 was used. All polymerizations were run in methylene dichloride at 30°C. with SnCl as initiator. To reduce the influence of formaldehyde production at the beginning of copolymerization, dioxolane was added to the solution of trioxane and initiator only at the end of the induction period—i.e., at the appearance of the first insoluble polyoxy-methylene. After various reaction times polymerizations were terminated by adding tributylamine. Monomer conversions were determined by gas chromatography, the liquid phase being injected directly. When conversions were small, isolation and analysis of the copolymer yielded more accurate results. 

---