Convective-diffusive-reactive systems

Another difficulty is related to the mass transfer by convection, as, by definition, the films are stagnant and hence, there should be no mass transport mechanism, except for molecular diffusion in the direction normal to the interface (Kenig, 2000). Nevertheless, convection in films is directly accounted for in correlations. Moreover, in case of reactive systems, the film thickness should depend on the reaction rate, which is beyond the two-film theory consideration. 

In a system with homogeneous reactions (e.g. reactive absorption), mass and heat transfer is described by the following convective diffusion and convective heat conduction equations (Kenig, 2000) ... 

In reactive flow analysis the Pick s law for binary systems (2.285) is frequently used as an extremely simple attempt to approximate the multicomponent molecular mass fluxes. This method is based on the hypothesis that the pseudo-binary mass flux approximations are fairly accurate for solute gas species in the particular cases when one of the species in the gas is in excess and acts as a solvent. However, this approach is generally not recommend-able for chemical reactor analysis because reactive mixtures are normally not sufficiently dilute. Nevertheless, many industrial reactor systems can be characterized as convection dominated reactive flows thus the Pickian diffusion model predictions might still look acceptable at first, but this interpretation is usually false because in reality the diffusive fluxes are then neglectable compared to the convective fluxes. 

It is further noted that the use of interfacial mass flux weighted transfer terms is generally not convenient treating multicomponent reactive systems, because the phase change processes are normally not modeled explicitly but deduced from the species composition dependent joint diffusive and convective interfacial transfer models. Moreover, the rigorous reaction kinetics and thermodynamic models of mixtures are always formulated on a molar basis. 

Variables. This system belongs to the physical chemical energy, in which the basic quantity is the substance amount n (or mole number) with unit in moles. The effort is the chemical potential p and the flow is the substance flow 3 (see the table of variables in the case study abstract). The name substance flow comes from the span of behaviors that the physical chemical energy has, which is wider than the chemical reactivity. Mass transfer (convection, diffusion, etc.) is a phenomenon... 

The effects of flow and mixing on reactive systems have been recognized for many decades, yet the interplay of convection and diffnsion has traditionally been treated with overly simplistic approaches. The complexity of applications where both diffusion and mechanical stirring occur simultaneously with reactions has been overwhelming to the point that perhaps in despair, critical aspects of... 

Reactive or catalytic systems are based on pH-responsive hydrogels where the chosen reaction generates a pH shift, which in mm leads to a swelling change in the hydrogel. This response can either be used to increase the internal mesh size to increase solute diffusivity in the gel phase for a diffusive membrane [44] or alternatively the gel can be used as a mechanical valve within the pores of a microporous membrane such that a convective flux may be mmed on or off in response to analyte... 

Its importance lies in the fact that the changes in composition in a reactor are not haphazard, but are of two distinct kinds. First, there are the advective changes due to material brought into the system or removed from it this may be by forced flow, convection, or diffusion. Second, there is the internal change of composition by reaction this change would be seen in a well-stirred batch reactor, for example, where advection has been deliberately eliminated. The advection will have to be expressed by certain terms in the material balance for a particular reactor, but the reactive changes are common to all types and deserve study first. 

In a convection-free system, and for a limited observation time (when compared to the characteristic time of the system, which itself depends on the diffusion coefficients and the inter-electrode distance) the electrolyte can be separated into three zones two diffusion layers close to the two reactive interfaces and an intermediate homogeneous zone within the electrolyte. The diffusion layers thicknesses increase with time, but they are both considered as small when compared to the inter-electrode distance. Here one refers to a transient state and each interface is defined as being in a semi-infinite mass transport condition. Both electrodes are independent, in spite of the fact that they are crossed by the same current. 

In a reactive flow system, the chemical timescales should not be treated in isolation from the relevant timescales of the flow processes which may include diffusion, convection/advection or turbulent mixing (Goussis et al. 2005b). The simple initial value problem expressed in Eq. (2.9) must therefore be extended to a system of partial differential equations. Using the notation of Bykov and Maas (2007), the evolution equation for the scalar field of a reacting flow can be described by... 

---