Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Controlled radical polymerization homopolymerization

The use of amine hydrochloride salts as initiators for controlled NCA polymerizations shows tremendous promise. The concept of fast, reversible deactivation of a reactive species to obtain controlled polymerization is a proven concept in polymer chemistry, and this system can be compared to the persistent radical effect employed in all controlled radical polymerization strategies [61]. Like those systems, success of this method requires a carefully controlled matching of the polymer chain propagation rate constant, the amine/amine hydrochloride equilibrium constant, and the forward and reverse exchange rate constants between amine and amine hydrochloride salt. This means that it is likely that reaction conditions (e.g., temperature, halide counterion, solvent) will need to be optimized to obtain controlled polymerization for each different NCA monomer, as is the case for most vinyl monomers in controlled radical polymerizations. Within these constraints, it is possible that controlled NCA homopolymerizations utilizing simple amine hydrochloride initiators can be obtained yet this method may not be advantageous for preparation of block copolypeptides due to the need for monomer-specific optimization. [Pg.17]

A number of other chemistries which involve C-O bond cleavage have been reported.226 22 Druliner226 has reported on systems where NCO, 112, 113 or related species is the persistent radical. Homolysis rates for these systems were stated to he suitable for MMA polymerization at ambient temperature. The use of NCO has also been studied by Grande et al. z most recently for AA polymerization.2 0 Although control during AA homopolymerization was poor the process yielded NCO- terminated PAA that could be used to make PAA-block-PMMA.230... [Pg.483]

The influence of changes in these other variables on MWD in a homopolymerization has not yet been tested, but whatever perturbations are introduced to the feed in a radical polymerization in a laboratory-scale CSTR, they are unlikely to introduce dramatic changes in the MWD of the product because of the extremely short life-time of the active propagating chains in relation to the hold-up time of the reactor. This small change in MWD could be advantageous in a radically initiated copolymerization where perturbations in monomer feeds could give control over polymer compositions independent of the MWD. This postulate is being explored currently. [Pg.264]

Homopolymerization. The free-radical polymerization of VDC has been carried out by solution, slurry, suspension, and emulsion methods. Slurry polymerizations are usually used only in the laboratory. The heterogeneity of the reaction makes stirring and heat transfer difficult consequently, these reactions cannot be easily controlled on a large scale. Aqueous emulsion or suspension reactions are preferred for large-scale operations. The spontaneous polymerization of VDC, so often observed when the monomer is stored at room temperature, is caused by peroxides formed from the reaction of VDC with oxygen, fery pure monomer does not polymerize under these conditions. Heterogeneous polymerization is characteristic of a number of monomers, including vinyl chloride and acrylonitrile. [Pg.1691]

So far, a great number of well-defined macromonomers as branch candidates have been prepared as will be described in Sect. 3. Then a problem is how to control their polymerization and copolymerization, that is how to design the backbone length, the backbone/branch composition, and their distribution. This will be discussed in Sect. 4. In brief, radical homopolymerization and copolymerization of macromonomers to poly(macromonomers) and statistical graft copolymers, respectively, have been fairly well understood in comparison with those of conventional monomers. However, a more precise control over the backbone length and distribution by, e.g., a living (co)polymerization is still an unsolved challenge. [Pg.135]

A wider range of acrylate/styrene block copolymers have been prepared by copper catalysts, partially because the homopolymerizations of both monomers can be controlled with common initiating systems. Both AB- (B-15 to B-17)202,230,254,366,367 and BA-type (B-18 to B-21)28,112,169,230,366,368,369 block copolymers were obtained from macroinitiators prepared by the copper-based systems. The block copolymerizations can also be conducted under air230 and under emulsion conditions with water.254 Combination of the Re-and Ru-mediated living radical polymerizations in... [Pg.490]

The free radical polymerization of pinenes and limonene is of little interest, because of the modest yields and DPs obtained with their homopolymerizations. However, their copolymerization with a variety of conventional monomers has been shown to produce some interesting materials, particularly in the case of controlled reversible addition fragmentation chain-transfer (RAFT) systems involving P-pinene and acrylic comonomers [5]. [Pg.4]

One important application of Lewis acid to asymmetric radical reactions is in the control of tacticity in free radical polymerizations. Recently, Porter [38] showed that Sc(OTf)3 modulates the polymerization of oxazolidinone acrylamides to produce highly isotactic copolymers (Scheme 12). The same study described homopolymerizations in which the m/r dyad ratio was dependent on the reaction temperature. [Pg.456]

Poly(styrene-c i-t-butyl acrylate). One of the major issues with TEMPO mediated "living free radical polymerizations is the very different reactivities of st5n ene and acrylates. It has been observed that TEMPO mediated styrene homopolymerization achieve high conversion, with low polydispersity and excellent molecular weight control. In contrast acrylate homopolymerizations exhibit considerably lower conversion with much broader polydispersities. Figure 2. However, it has been shown that "living" free radical polymerization permits the synthesis of well defined... [Pg.150]

Lacroix and coworkers reported a reverse iodine transfer pol5mierization (RITP), where elemental iodine is used as a control agent in living radical polymerization [288]. Styrene, butyl acrylate, methyl acrylate, and butyl ot-fluoroacrylate were homopolymerized, using a radical catalyst and I2 as a chain transfer agent. Methyl acrylate was also copolymerized with vinyUdene chloride using this process. [Pg.130]

Kinetic and theoretical studies The nitroxide-mediated copolymerization was far less studied than the homopolymerization although a large number of polymers produced via a radical polymerization mechanism are actually random copolymers. Early kinetic and mechanistic studies were published by Zaremski et al. for the TEMPO-mediated copolymerization of styrene with various comonomers. They discussed various regimes depending on the ability or disability of the second monomer to undergo a controlled/living NMP and determined experimentally the activation-deactivation equilibrium constants for many of those systems. [Pg.300]

A new rate model for free radical homopolymerization which accounts for diffusion-controlled termination and propagation, and which gives a limiting conversion, has been developed based on ft ee-volume theory concepts. The model gives excellent agreement with measured rate data for bulk and solution polymerization of MMA over wide ranges of temperature and initiator and solvent concentrations. [Pg.58]

Usually or most widely applied, polymer latexes are made by emulsion polymerization [ 1 ]. Without any doubt, emulsion polymerization has created a wide field of applications, but in the present context one has to be aware that an inconceivable restricted set of polymer reactions can be performed in this way. Emulsion polymerization is good for the radical homopolymerization of a set of barely water-soluble monomers. Already heavily restricted in radical copolymerization, other polymer reactions cannot be performed. The reason for this is the polymerization mechanism where the polymer particles are the product of kinetically controlled growth and are built from the center to the surface, where all the monomer has to be transported by diffusion through the water phase. Because of the dictates of kinetics, even for radical copolymerization, serious disadvantages such as lack of homogeneity and restrictions in the accessible composition range have to be accepted. [Pg.77]

Gnanou et al. reported the first successful homopolymerization of nBA in 1997 [70, 72,155] using a new nitroxide, N-ferf-butyl-AT-[l-diethylphosphono-(2,2-dimethylpropyl)] nitroxide (DEPN, Fig. 10). This nitroxide not only afforded faster polymerization rates at lower temperatures for the polymerization of St, but also allowed the controlled polymerization of nBA [73,156]. Further investigation showed that the success of the system lay in changing the equilibrium between the dormant chain and active species to favor the formation of a higher concentration of active species and therefore required the addition of free DEPN for full control [73] via the persistent radical effect [56]. Gnanou et al. also demonstrated that N-ferf-butyl- [1-phenyl-(2-methylpropyl)] nitroxide (BPPN, Fig. 12) could be used to moderate the polymerization of St, resulting in polymers with Mw/Mn<1.10 [156]. [Pg.44]

Several methods can be used to synthesize block copolymers. Using living polymerization, monomer A is homopolymerized to form a block of A then monomer B is added and reacts with the active chain end of segment A to form a block of B. With careful control of the reaction conditions, this technique can produce a variety of well-defined block copolymers. This ionic technique is discussed in more detail in a later section. Mechanicochemical degradation provides a very useful and simple way to produce polymeric free radicals. When a rubber is mechanically sheared (Ceresa, 1965), as during mastication, a reduction in molecular weight occurs as a result of the physical pulling apart of macromolecules. This chain rupture forms radicals of A and B, which then recombine to form a block copolymer. This is not a preferred method because it usually leads to a mixture of poorly defined block copolymers. [Pg.534]


See other pages where Controlled radical polymerization homopolymerization is mentioned: [Pg.187]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.9198]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.9197]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.920]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.578]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.779]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.364]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.27 , Pg.29 , Pg.32 ]




SEARCH



Controlled polymerization

Controlled radical

Controlled radical polymerization

Homopolymerizations

© 2024 chempedia.info