Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Control sample comparison

Using a urine sample spiked with omeprazole and its metabolites as an example, Table 6.4, part (a) shows the control sample comparison results of the MDF data. The urine sample was obtained by a 1 50 dilution of the omeprazole HLM mixture with... [Pg.237]

TABLE 6.4. Results of Control Sample Comparison Between Urine Sample and Urine Sample Spiked with Omeprazole HLM Metabolites... [Pg.238]

Relyea, J.F. Serne, R.J. "Controlled Sample Program Publication Number 2 Interlaboratory Comparison of Batch Kj Values", Report PNL-2872, Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory, 1979. [Pg.343]

Fig. 8.12 Comparison of drug-release profiles recorded in simulated gastric medium (pH =2) for (a) ibuprofen-AMP nanocomposite and (b) control sample (ibuprofen-talc suspension). Fig. 8.12 Comparison of drug-release profiles recorded in simulated gastric medium (pH =2) for (a) ibuprofen-AMP nanocomposite and (b) control sample (ibuprofen-talc suspension).
Once analytical results have been produced, invariably a certain amount of manipulation is necessary to translate the results into information that can be understood by the customer. The reporting analyst may have to sort and process a large and varied amount of information in order to produce a small number of final answers. Data from standards may be used to produce calibration curves or calibrate instrument response. Results from quality control samples will have been plotted on charts to ensure that the system was working satisfactorily at the time the measurements were made. Sample data will be quantified by comparison with the standards and suitable corrections made. Then, checks may be made to confirm the results by examining the answers to look for any obvious wrong data. It is... [Pg.207]

Table I shows the molecular weight and the degree of end group substitution of the monofunctional polystyrene samples obtained. In Table II the corresponding data for the bifunctional samples are given. The samples were characterized by GPC in THF. and were calculated. Comparison with the corresponding nonfunctionalized control samples show good agreement. The results of the light scattering and osmotic pressure experiments with the acid form of the sulfonated polystyrenes were in agreement. No association was observed for THF solutions. Table I shows the molecular weight and the degree of end group substitution of the monofunctional polystyrene samples obtained. In Table II the corresponding data for the bifunctional samples are given. The samples were characterized by GPC in THF. and were calculated. Comparison with the corresponding nonfunctionalized control samples show good agreement. The results of the light scattering and osmotic pressure experiments with the acid form of the sulfonated polystyrenes were in agreement. No association was observed for THF solutions.
Fourteen day old bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L., lot DU15, Burpee Seed Company, Riverside, California) were used in these experiments. Plants were exposed to 0.4 ppm O3 for one hr in a fxmiigation chamber with the procediares and conditions outlined previously (J, ). Samples of the leaves were taken at the end of the fumigation period, and at one, two and four hr intervals after the fumigation period. Control samples for comparison were taken from untreated leaves. The samples were prepared for study with the electron microscope by fixation at... [Pg.83]

Test No 2 A small sample of explosive is placed on an asbestos board and a small flame of a Bunsen burner is directed against it for 10 seconds. It is considered noninflammable if it does not ignite in this period. Control samples of known explosives should be included for comparison... [Pg.361]

Fig. 1.6 Photocatalytic kiUing of . coli on TiO electrosprayed samples (a - fabric and b - aluminum foil) in comparison with uncoated (control) samples irradiated with UV-A light... Fig. 1.6 Photocatalytic kiUing of . coli on TiO electrosprayed samples (a - fabric and b - aluminum foil) in comparison with uncoated (control) samples irradiated with UV-A light...
The most frequently used tests in quality control in the flavour industry are paired-sample comparison tests, and triangle tests, which are often combined with the description of deviation from a reference item. For the selection and training of panellists, further test methods are used, for example ranking tests for colour, taste and odour, threshold detections (taste, off-flavour), colour blindness tests and odour identification tests [6]. [Pg.307]

A new calibration curve must be implemented every time a new stock of internal standard solution is prepared, and at least twice per year. New calibration curves are validated by the following criteria for acceptability point-to-point comparison (<10% difference from the previous calibration curve), coefficient of linear regression (>0.99), intercept and slope (<10% difference from previous calibration curve). Normal and abnormal control samples are calculated against the new and the old curve and compared to the current quality control (QC) mean as the final step in the validation of the new curve. The new calibration curve is then used with subsequent runs if the curve validation is acceptable. Curves are unique to each instrument and therefore must be established for each instrument prior to clinical use. [Pg.146]

Sensory Evaluation. The organoleptic evaluation of the samples was conducted by a paired comparison test. The expert panel consisted of six to eight members.The encapsulated samples (stored at 45 C) were evaluated against the control samples at O.IJIJ (w/w) in spring water. [Pg.91]

Analysis of the functions and interactions of proteins in healthy tissue compared to tissue affected by a disease. Proteomics includes the the separation, identification characterisation of proteins present in a biological sample and comparison of disease and control samples to identify "disease specific proteins". These proteins may have potential as targets for drugs or as molecular markers of disease. [Pg.591]


See other pages where Control sample comparison is mentioned: [Pg.224]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.945]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.220]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.152 ]




SEARCH



Control sample

Control sample comparison software

Controller comparison

Controls comparisons

Sample comparison

Sampling controller

© 2024 chempedia.info