Constraint slack

A method of formatting the equations and inequality constraints. Slack variables are used to transform the inequality constraints into equality constraints. 

Conditions in Eq. (3-86), called complementaiy slackness conditions, state that either the constraint gj(z) = 0 and/or its corresponding multipher is zero. If constraint gj(z) is zero, it is behaving hke an equality constraint, and its multiplier pi is exactly the same as a Lagrange multiplier for an equality constraint. If the constraint is... 

The foregoing inequality constraints must be converted to equality constraints before the operation begins, and this is done by introducing a slack variable q, for each. The several equations are then combined into a Lagrange function F, and this necessitates the introduction of a Lagrange multiplier, X, for each constraint. 

Dealing with batch size restrictions is slightly more elaborate. Two new variables need to be defined, one of them being integer. In each period tthe current campaign quantity (K, + Xjt) is split into two variables. One of them (Rjt) counts the number of full batches already produced in the current campaign and the second one (Sjt) takes the rest. This is done by constraints (11.15) and (11.16). The latter one takes care that no more than a full batch is contained in slack variables Sjt nor any rest remains if production of another campaign starts. Finally, (11.17) and (11.18) state the domain of the variables Rjt and Sjt. 

Note that all the constraints in Equation (7.4) are equalities. It is necessary to place the problem in this form to solve it most easily (equations are easier to work with here than inequalities). If the original system is not of this form, it may easily be transformed by use of so-called slack variables. If a given constraint is an inequality, for example,... 

In the rest of this chapter, we assume that the rows of the constraint matrix A are linearly independent, that is, rank (A) = m. If a slack variable is inserted in every row, then A contains a submatrix that is the identity matrix. In the preceding example, if we insert a slack variable x5 into the equality ... 

The following figure shows the constraints. If slack variables jc3, x4 and x5 are added respectively to the inequality constraints, you can see from the diagram that the origin is not a feasible point, that is, you cannot start the simplex method by letting x x2 = 0 because then x3 = 20, x4 = -5, and x5 = -33, a violation of the assumption in linear programming that x > 0. What should you do to apply the simplex method to the problem other than start a phase I procedure of introducing artificial variables ... 

These results may be restated to include all constraints by defining the multiplier uj to be zero if gj(x ) previous example uj, the multiplier of the inactive constraint g3, is zero. Then we can say that uj > 0 if g/x ) = c-, and uj = 0 if gj(x ) < Cp thus the product uj gj(x) - cj is zero for all j. This property, that inactive inequality constraints have zero multipliers, is called complementary slackness. Conditions (8.21) and (8.22) then become... 

The vector x can contain slack variables, so the equality constraints (8.33) may contain some constraints that were originally inequalities but have been converted to equalities by inserting slacks. Codes for quadratic programming allow arbitrary upper and lower bounds on x we assume x>0 only for simplicity. 

GRG converts inequality constraints to equalities by introducing slack variables. If s is the slack in this case, the inequality x - y > 0 becomes x — y — s = 0. We must also add the bound for the slack, ssO, giving the new problem ... 

Let the starting point be (1, 0), at which the objective value is 6.5 and the inequality is satisfied strictly, that is, its slack is positive (s = 1). At this point the bounds are also all satisfied, although y is at its lower bound. Because all of the constraints (except for bounds) are inactive at the starting point, there are no equalities that must be solved for values of dependent variables. Hence we proceed to minimize the objective subject only to the bounds on the nonbasic variables x and y. There are no basic variables. The reduced problem is simply the original problem ignoring the inequality constraint. In solving this reduced problem, we do keep track of the inequality. If it becomes active or violated, then the reduced problem changes. 

Because we now have reached an active constraint, use it to solve for one variable in terms of the other, as in the earlier equality constrained example. Let x be the basic, or dependent, variable, and y and s the nonbasic (independent) ones. Solving the constraint for x in terms of y and the slack s yields... 

The most important parameter choices for SVMs (Section 5.6) are the specification of the kernel function and the parameter y controlling the priority of the size constraint of the slack variables (see Section 5.6). We selected RBFs for the kernel because they are fast to compute. Figure 5.27 shows the misclassification errors for varying values of y by using the evaluation scheme described above for k-NN classification. The choice of y = 0.1 is optimal, and it leads to a test error of 0.34. 

Because the sum of all the fractions must equal unity (or 100%), only - 1 of the components can be specified independently the remaining component is a dependent or slack variable [Snee (1973)]. Such a system is said to have n - I degrees of freedom. It is impossible to increase the fraction of one component in the mixture without decreasing the fraction of at least one other component. Placing one or more equality constraints on a system often leads to a confounded (or confused) interpretation of experimental data. Care must be exercised when assigning component effects to a particular response. In mixtures, for example, an observed change in response could be attributed to the increase in one component or to the concomitant decrease in one or more of the other components. 

The dual prices of slacks on mass balance and product requirement rows can be interpreted more specifically. Consider a mass balance constraint ... 

The dual price of the slack variable sm on this constraint indicates the effect of selling this product at the margin, that is, it indicates the marginal profit on the product. Ifthe constraint is slack, so that the slack variable is positive (basic), the profit at the margin must obviously be zero and this is in line with the zero dual price of all basic variables. Since cost + profit — realization for a product, the sum of the dual prices on its balance and requirement constraints equals its coefficient in the original objective function. 

Compensating slack variables accounting for shortfall and/or surplus in production are introduced in the stochastic constraints with the following results (i) inequality constraints are replaced with equality constraints (ii) numerical feasibility of the stochastic constraints can be ensured for all events and (iii) penalties for feasibility violations can be added to the objective function. Since a probability can be assigned to each realization of the stochastic parameter vector (i.e., to each scenario), the probability of feasible operation can be measured. In this... 

Electroneutrality may also be implemented by imposing the requirement that F(000) equal the number of electrons in the unit cell. The equation F(000) = ne can be treated as an observation, with a weight sufficient to keep the crystal practically neutral, but sufficiently small such as not to dominate the least-squares treatment. This slack constraint (Pawley 1972) has been applied in electron density analysis by Hirshfeld (1977). 

According to these results the slack variables vanish in the constraints 1 and 2, which are of type <. Therefore, the optimal solution is on the boundary defined by these two constraints. Such constraints are said to be active ones. In physical terms it means that the available supplies of raw material A and are both exhausted. The optimal strategy is producing 16.7 units of product I and 29.3 units of product II. 

As discussed, a constraint with is transformed into an equality by adding a (nonnegative) slack variable to its left-hand side. The same can be done in an inequality with >, this time by substracting a (nonnegative) slack variable from its left-hand side. 

With inequality constraints of the form < only, the columns corresponding to the slack variables can be used as a starting basis. This does not work for the generalized problem, and we must proceed in two phases. 

This minimax problem can be converted to a simpler nonlinear program (NLP) by introducing a slack variable /3 to measure violations of the inequality constraints ... 

The energy balance without the slacks (17 = 173 = 0) assumes that the temperature breakpoint occurs inside the exchanger. To demonstrate that the energy balance is correct when the breakpoint occurs outside, consider the case when the breakpoint is upstream of the exchanger (7BR > T2). Then constraints (21b)-(21i) give... 

Activation and deactivation of inequality and equality constraints can be obtained in a similar way. For instance, let us consider the model of a process unit i that consists of one inequality g(x) < 0 and one equality h(x) = 0. If the process unit i does not exist (i.e., yi = 0), then both the equality and inequality should be relaxed. If, however, the process unit i exists (i.e., yi = 1), then the inequality and equality constraints should be activated. This can be expressed by introducing positive slack variables for the equality and inequality constraint and writing the model as... 

The coefficients of the above linear expressions are obtained via regression analysis of the simulation data taken at a variety of pressure levels Floudas and Paules (1988). Note that in the above definitions we have introduced a set of slack variables. These are introduced so as to prevent infeasibilities from arising from the equality constraints whenever a column does not participate in the activated sequence. These slack variables participate in the set of logical constraints and are both set to zero if the corresponding column exists, while they are activated to nonzero value if the column does not exist, so as to relax the associated equality constraints. 

Slack variables need to be introduced in the linear constraints between the reboiler and condenser temperatures so as to avoid potential infeasibilities. Note that the expressions in (iii) and (iv) are linear because this is the result of the regression analysis of the simulation data. In the general case, however, they may be nonlinear. 

The logical constraints for the slack variables coupled with the nonnegativity of the slacks imply that if for instance, y — 1, then... 

---