Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Constant first quantitative demonstration

Quantitative measurements of simple and enzyme-catalyzed reaction rates were under way by the 1850s. In that year Wilhelmy derived first order equations for acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of sucrose which he could follow by the inversion of rotation of plane polarized light. Berthellot (1862) derived second-order equations for the rates of ester formation and, shortly after, Harcourt observed that rates of reaction doubled for each 10 °C rise in temperature. Guldberg and Waage (1864-67) demonstrated that the equilibrium of the reaction was affected by the concentration ) of the reacting substance(s). By 1877 Arrhenius had derived the definition of the equilbrium constant for a reaction from the rate constants of the forward and backward reactions. Ostwald in 1884 showed that sucrose and ester hydrolyses were affected by H+ concentration (pH). [Pg.181]

When the experimentalist set an ambitious objective to evaluate micromechanical properties quantitatively, he will predictably encounter a few fundamental problems. At first, the continuum description which is usually used in contact mechanics might be not applicable for contact areas as small as 1 -10 nm [116,117]. Secondly, since most of the polymers demonstrate a combination of elastic and viscous behaviour, an appropriate model is required to derive the contact area and the stress field upon indentation a viscoelastic and adhesive sample [116,120]. In this case, the duration of the contact and the scanning rate are not unimportant parameters. Moreover, bending of the cantilever results in a complicated motion of the tip including compression, shear and friction effects [131,132]. Third, plastic or inelastic deformation has to be taken into account in data interpretation. Concerning experimental conditions, the most important is to perform a set of calibrations procedures which includes the (x,y,z) calibration of the piezoelectric transducers, the determination of the spring constants of the cantilever, and the evaluation of the tip shape. The experimentalist has to eliminate surface contamination s and be certain about the chemical composition of the tip and the sample. [Pg.128]

Substrate limitations have been documented and quantitatively described ( U, 2, 17 ). Dooley et al. (11) present an excellent description of modeling a reaction in macroreticular resin under conditions where diffusion coefficients are not constant. Their study was complicated by the fact that not all the intrinsic variables could be measured independently several intrinsic parameters were found by fitting the substrate transport with reaction model to the experimental data. Roucls and Ekerdt (16) studied olefin hydrogenation in a gel-form resin. They were able to measure the intrinsic kinetic parameters and the diffusion coefficient independently and demonstrate that the substrate transport with reaction model presented earlier is applicable to polymer-immobilized catalysts. Finally, Marconi and Ford (17) employed the same formalism discussed here to an immobilized phase transfer catalyst. The reaction was first-order and their study presents a very readable application of the principles as well as presents techniques for interpreting substrate limitations in trlphase systems. [Pg.80]

As shown in Tables 4.1 and 4.2 and Figs. 4.1-4.3, Romanoff (1957) demonstrated that the rate of corrosion is greatest in the first few years after burial and decreases to a much lower constant rate thereafter. Romanoff indicated that this damping of corrosion was a more significant parameter than the initial rate. He proposed quantitative empirical relationships to calculate average loss of thickness of plain steel as a function of time. [Pg.362]

Shifting of the energy of the MLCT excited state has important consequences on the emission properties. In general, lowering of the energy is accompanied by decreased emission quantum yield and shorter lifetimes. Meyer et al. have demonstrated this behaviour for the CT excited state of Ru(II), Os(II) and Re(I) complexes [24], Table 4 illustrates this effect with some data on the Re(I)-carbonyl bipyridine complexes. In all these Re(I) complexes, the first reduction is bpy-based and occurs at a constant potential of -1.25 0.05 V vs. SCE. The changes in the radiative properties are due to increased occurrence of competitive non-radiative pathway. Data of this kind have been quantitatively interpreted in terms of the "energy gap law". [Pg.121]


See other pages where Constant first quantitative demonstration is mentioned: [Pg.40]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.1089]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.1819]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.731]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.6049]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.794]    [Pg.548]   


SEARCH



Demonstration

Demonstrators

© 2024 chempedia.info