Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Concentration profiles experimental

Fig. 9-19. Internal concentration profiles experimental (points) and simulated (lines) results. Squares and full lines for component A triangles and dashed lines for B species. Fig. 9-19. Internal concentration profiles experimental (points) and simulated (lines) results. Squares and full lines for component A triangles and dashed lines for B species.
Rate constant, rate law, concentration profile, experimental measurement, integrated rate laws, linear plots, half-lifes Theory of the rate constant (activation energy, orientation factor, collision frequency factor, Transition State Theory)... [Pg.297]

Film Theory. Many theories have been put forth to explain and correlate experimentally measured mass transfer coefficients. The classical model has been the film theory (13,26) that proposes to approximate the real situation at the interface by hypothetical "effective" gas and Hquid films. The fluid is assumed to be essentially stagnant within these effective films making a sharp change to totally turbulent flow where the film is in contact with the bulk of the fluid. As a result, mass is transferred through the effective films only by steady-state molecular diffusion and it is possible to compute the concentration profile through the films by integrating Fick s law ... [Pg.21]

One potential problem with this approach is that heat loss from a small scale column is much greater than from a larger diameter column. As a result, small columns tend to operate almost isotherm ally whereas in a large column the system is almost adiabatic. Since the temperature profile in general affects the concentration profile, the LUB may be underestimated unless great care is taken to ensure adiabatic operation of the experimental column. [Pg.263]

In neutron reflectivity, neutrons strike the surface of a specimen at small angles and the percentage of neutrons reflected at the corresponding angle are measured. The an jular dependence of the reflectivity is related to the variation in concentration of a labeled component as a function of distance from the surface. Typically the component of interest is labeled with deuterium to provide mass contrast against hydrogen. Use of polarized neutrons permits the determination of the variation in the magnetic moment as a function of depth. In all cases the optical transform of the concentration profiles is obtained experimentally. [Pg.50]

Table 11-2 gives the results of the computer simulation and Ligure 11-17 shows the concentration profiles of the cell, gluconolactone, gluconic acid, and glucose with time. These profiles are in good agreement with the experimental data of Rai and Constantinides [14]. [Pg.868]

The steady state TMB package was used to compare the theoretical and experimental internal concentration profiles in Fig. 9-19. Figure 9-20 shows the transient evolution on the concentration of both species in the raffinate. Average concentrations over a full cycle were evaluated experimentally for cycles 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18. Also shown are the corresponding SMB model predictions. The agreement between them is good and the cyclic steady-state, in terms of raffinate concentrations, is obtained after 10 full cycles. [Pg.248]

The meaning of the surface excess is illustrated in Fig. 1, in which the solid line represents the actual concentration profile of an adsorbate i, when the bulk concentration of i in the phase a (a = O or W) is c . The hatched area corresponds to be the surface excess of i, T,. This quantity depends on the location of the dividing surface. On the other hand, the experimentally accessible quantity should not depend on the location of the artificially introduced dividing surface. The relative surface excess, which is independent of the location of the dividing surface, is defined by relativizing it with respect to those of certain reference components. In oil water interfaces, the mutual solubility of solvents can be significant. The relative surface excess in Eq. (3) is then related to the surface excesses through... [Pg.121]

The theory has been verified by voltammetric measurements using different hole diameters and by electrochemical simulations [13,15]. The plot of the half-wave potential versus log[(4d/7rr)-I-1] yielded a straight line with a slope of 60 mV (Fig. 3), but the experimental points deviated from the theory for small radii. Equations (3) to (5) show that the half-wave potential depends on the hole radius, the film thickness, the interface position within the hole, and the diffusion coefficient values. When d is rather large or the diffusion coefficient in the organic phase is very low, steady-state diffusion in the organic phase cannot be achieved because of the linear diffusion field within the microcylinder [Fig. 2(c)]. Although no analytical solution has been reported for non-steady-state IT across the microhole, the simulations reported in Ref. 13 showed that the diffusion field is asymmetrical, and concentration profiles are similar to those in micropipettes (see... [Pg.382]

A useful application of the model is to examine the S02 and 02 concentration profiles in the trickle bed. These are shown for the steady-state conditions used by Haure et al. (1989) in Fig. 25. The equilibrium S02 concentration drops through the bed, but the 02 concentration is constant. In Haure s experiments 02 partial pressure is 16 times the S02 partial pressure. At the catalyst particle surface, however, 02 concentration is much smaller and is only about one-third of the S02 concentration. This explains why 02 transport is rate limiting and why experimentally oxidation appears to be zero-order in S02. [Pg.261]

In practice, estimation of Laq requires information on the rate of solute removal at the membrane since aqueous resistance is calculated from experimental data defining the solute concentration profile across this barrier [7], Mean /.aq values calculated from the product of aqueous diffusivity (at body temperature) and aqueous resistance obtained from human and animal intestinal perfusion experiments in situ are in the range of 100-900 pm, compared to lumenal radii of 0.2 cm (rat) and 1 cm (human). These estimates will necessarily be a function of perfusion flow rate and choice of solute. The lower Laq estimated in vivo is rationalized by better mixing within the lumen in the vicinity of the mucosal membrane [6],... [Pg.170]

Fig. 1 Concentration profiles of (a) BP3, (b) BP1 and (c) 4-MBC concentration during 24 h degradation experiment by T. versicolor at Erlenmeyer scale and at 10 mg/L initial concentration. Treatments (filled circle) uninoculated controls (UNI), (open circle) experimental bottles (EB) and (filled inverted triangle) heat-killed controls (HK). Laccase activity in EB is also plotted in long dashes. Values plotted are means standard error for triplicates. Modified from [44, 49]... Fig. 1 Concentration profiles of (a) BP3, (b) BP1 and (c) 4-MBC concentration during 24 h degradation experiment by T. versicolor at Erlenmeyer scale and at 10 mg/L initial concentration. Treatments (filled circle) uninoculated controls (UNI), (open circle) experimental bottles (EB) and (filled inverted triangle) heat-killed controls (HK). Laccase activity in EB is also plotted in long dashes. Values plotted are means standard error for triplicates. Modified from [44, 49]...
In spite of its limitations, the ACAT model combined with modeling of saturable processes has become a powerful tool in the study of oral absorption and pharmacokinetics. To our knowledge, it is the only tool that can translate in vitro data from early drug discovery experiments all the way to plasma concentration profiles and nonlinear dose-relationship predictions. As more experimental data become available, we believe that the model will become more comprehensive and its predictive capabilities will be further enhanced. [Pg.439]

The resulting velocity profiles and the flow pattern inside and around the jet are shown in Figs. 29 and 30 for a jet velocity of 32.6 m/s and with two different aeration flows. The jet boundary at Vz = 8 m/s shown in Figs. 29 and 30 was calculated from Tollmien similarity. The boundary where the tracer gas concentration becomes zero, C = 0, was determined from the normalized experimental tracer gas concentration profiles shown in Figs. [Pg.281]

Figure 25. Experimental concentration profiles at different distances from the jet nozzle (Run GJ18). Figure 25. Experimental concentration profiles at different distances from the jet nozzle (Run GJ18).
Figure 26. Experimental Concentration Profiles at Different Distances from the Jet Nozzle (Run GJ35). Figure 26. Experimental Concentration Profiles at Different Distances from the Jet Nozzle (Run GJ35).
Comparison of the calculated and the experimentally observed tracer concentration profiles is good as shown in Figs. 38 through 42 for set points 3 employing the 0.254 m jet nozzle assembly. [Pg.307]

Comparison of the Experimental and Simulation Results. The preceding discussion has shown that both the experimental anthracene fluorescence profiles and the simulated anthracene concentration profiles decrease in a manner which closely follows an exponential decay. Therefore, the most convenient way to compare the simulation results to the experimental data is to define an effective overall photosensitization rate constant, kx or k2, as described above. Adoption of this lumped-parameter effective kinetic constant allows us to conveniently and efficiently compare the experimental data to the simulation results by contrasting the rate constant obtained from the steady-state fluorescence decay with the value obtained from the simulated decrease in the anthracene concentration. [Pg.103]


See other pages where Concentration profiles experimental is mentioned: [Pg.633]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.686]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.567]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.590]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.651]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.139]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.188 ]




SEARCH



Concentration profile

© 2024 chempedia.info