Concentration data approaches

XRF nowadays provides accurate concentration data at major and low trace levels for nearly all the elements in a wide variety of materials. Hardware and software advances enable on-line application of the fundamental approach in either classical or influence coefficient algorithms for the correction of absorption and enhancement effects. Vendors software packages, such as QuantAS (ARL), SSQ (Siemens), X40, IQ+ and SuperQ (Philips), are precalibrated analytical programs, allowing semiquantitative to quantitative analysis for elements in any type of (unknown) material measured on a specific X-ray spectrometer without standards or specific calibrations. The basis is the fundamental parameter method for calculation of correction coefficients for matrix elements (inter-element influences) from fundamental physical values such as absorption and secondary fluorescence. UniQuant (ODS) calibrates instrumental sensitivity factors (k values) for 79 elements with a set of standards of the pure element. In this approach to inter-element effects, it is not necessary to determine a calibration curve for each element in a matrix. Calibration of k values with pure standards may still lead to systematic errors for unknown polymer samples. UniQuant provides semiquantitative XRF analysis [242]. 

The data are then plotted as a function of cumulative MTS exposure and fit with an exponential equation to obtain the pseudo first-order rate (ki) and plateau. The plateau achieved with lower MTS concentrations should approach that obtained with the application (2 min) of a high MTS concentration. 

These solutions to the one-dimensional advection-diffusion model can be used to estimate reaction rate constants Ck) from the pore-water concentrations of S, if and s are known. More sophisticated approaches have been used to define the reaction rate term as the sum of multiple removals and additions whose functionalities are not necessarily first-order. Information on the reaction kinetics is empirically obtained by determining which algorithmic representation of the rate law best fits the vertical depth concentration data. The best-fit rate law can then be used to provide some insight into potential... 

Boss, et al., fitted Gq. (17) to their data vs. vdi enabling them to determine fp and D . At solvent concentration approaching vdiI = 0.95, the data revealed an enhancement above the value predicted by Eq. (17) as fitted to the lower-concentration data. The authors argued that under these circumstances macroscopic inhomogeneities in concentration (and hence in the free-volume distribution) should exist and enhance the diffusivity. Above v > 0.99 the polymer coils no longer overlapped substantially, depriving the solvent molecules of a set of obstacles fixed with respect to the laboratory, and solvent diffusion became related principally to intrinsic viscosity. 

In previous chapters, we discussed two different ways to determine the value of an equilibrium constant K from concentration data (Section 13.2) and from thermochemical data (Section 17.11). In this section, we ve added a third way from electrochemical data. The following are the key relationships needed for each approach ... 

The simplest approach to determining the number of significant components is by measuring the autoprediction error. This is also called the root mean square error of calibration. Usually (but not exclusively) the error is calculated on the concentration data matrix (c), and we will restrict the discussion below to errors in concentration importantly, similar equations can be obtained for the x data. 

When sufficient data are available, use of the benchmark dose (BMD) or benchmark concentration (BMC) approach is preferable to the traditional health-based guidance value approaches (IPCS, 1999a, 2005 USEPA, 2000 Sonich-Mullin et al 2001). The BMDL (or BMCL) is the lower confidence limit on a dose (the BMD) (or concentration, BMC) that produces a particular level of response or change from the control mean (e.g. 10% response rate for quantal responses one standard deviation from the control mean for a continuous response) and can be used in place of the NOAEL. The BMD/BMC approach provides several advantages for dose-response evaluation 1) the model fits all of the available data and takes into account the slope of the dose-response curve 2) it accounts for variability in the data and 3) the BMD/BMC is not limited to one experimental exposure level, and the model can extrapolate outside of the experimental range. 

The USFDA approach to assessing exposure to migrants from FCMs is explained in CFSAN/Office of Food Additive Safety, April 2002 and is available on their web site (http //www.cfsan.fda.gov/). It describes the use of exposure estimates for use in food contact notifications (FCNs) which would normally be based upon simulant rather than food migration data, as is the case for new materials. The USFDA approach is described in more detail in Chapter 2. In the USFDA approach a consumption factor is combined with a food distribution factor and concentration data to derive an estimate of exposure from all food types and all FCMs containing the substance of interest. 

Figure 9 shows the pH-dependence of lead adsorption which would be predicted using the chemical free-energy term that gives the best fit in the James and Healy ( ) model with the data in Table I. It can be seen that the adsorption edge positions are rather similar for total lead concentrations which differ by an order of magnitude or more. Only when the total lead concentration closely approaches the CEC is it predicted that it becomes... 

---