Computation scheme for gas-phase

Computational Scheme for Gas-Phase PFRs. A general procedure for solving the reactor design equations for a piston flow reactor using the marching-ahead technique (Euler s method) has seven steps ... 

Thus, we see that Henry s law fits into our computational scheme for VLE, as an ideal solution law, with the choice of. liquid phase Often it is applied in examples like the air-water example in Chapter 3, in which one species in the gas (e.g., water) exists as a vapor, while one or more other species in the gas (e.g., nitrogen and oxygen) are present as gases above their critical temperatures. Purists would describe that as part VLE (for the water) and part gas-Hquid equilibrium (for the nitrogen and oxygen). The gaseous phase would be called a gas, not a vapor, but we see that this is a matter of arbitrary definitions. 

The base catalysis and the monoelectronic reductive activation processes have been described by a computational investigation at the R(U)B3LYP/6-31 + G(d,p) level of theory for the model imide NI (Scheme 2.14) 47 both in the gas phase and in aqueous solution, using PCM solvation model.40... 

An alternative approach to calculating the free energy of solvation is to carry out simulations corresponding to the two vertical arrows in the thermodynamic cycle in Fig. 2.6. The transformation to nothing should not be taken literally -this means that the perturbed Hamiltonian contains not only terms responsible for solute-solvent interactions - viz. for the right vertical arrow - but also all the terms that involve intramolecular interactions in the solute. If they vanish, the solvent is reduced to a collection of noninteracting atoms. In this sense, it disappears or is annihilated from both the solution and the gas phase. For this reason, the corresponding computational scheme is called double annihilation. Calculations of... 

As before, we can perform reverse simulations. Instead of annihilating the solute, we can create it by turning on the perturbation part of the Hamiltonian. The resulting free energy differences are connected through the relation Z A reation — creation = Annihilation - annihilation- Comparison of this creation scheme with the transformation described by the horizonal arrow reveals two important differences. First, the vertical transformations require two sets of simulations instead of one, although one of them involves only solute in the gas phase and, is, therefore, much less computationally intensive. Second, the two methods differ in their description of the solute in the reference state. In both cases the solute does not interact with the solvent. For the vertical transformations, however, all interactions between atoms forming the solute vanish, whereas in the horizontal transformation, the molecule remains intact. 

The chlorine atom adds in the gas phase to propadiene (la) with a rate constant that is close to the gas-kinetic limit. According to the data from laser flash photolysis experiments, this step furnishes exclusively the 2-chloroallyl radical (2a) [16, 36], A computational analysis of this reaction indicates that the chlorine atom encounters no detectable energy barrier as it adds either to Ca or to Cp in diene la to furnish chlorinated radical 2a or 3a. A comparison between experimental and computed heats of formation points to a significant thermochemical preference for 2-chloroal-lyl radical formation in this reaction (Scheme 11.2). Due to the exothermicity of both addition steps, intermediates 2a and 3a are formed with considerable excess energy, thus allowing isomerizations of the primary adducts to follow. 

---