Composition of Complexes in Solution

Although it is well known that the most frequently encountered coordination numbers are 2, 4, and 6, we should expect that for some ligands and metal ions different or unknown ratios of ligands to metal ions might occur under certain conditions. If several different complexes are formed, the problem of determining composition may be quite complicated. For simplicity, we shall assume that only one complex is formed between the metal and ligand or that the amounts of all other complexes formed can be neglected compared to the amount of the dominant complex. 

The equation for the formation of a complex by metal A and ligand B is written as 

Taking the logarithm of both sides of this equation yields 

To obtain data for use with this equation, a series of solutions can be prepared in which the concentration of B is kept constant but the concentration of A is varied. For each of these solutions, the concentration of the complex [A Bm] is measured as a function of [A]. For many complexes, the concentration of the complex can be measured by spectrometry because many complexes absorb at a wavelength that is different from that of the metal ion or ligand alone (see Chapter 18). When [B] is kept constant, Eq. (19.5) reduces to 

This procedure can be repeated, keeping the concentration of A fixed and varying the concentration of B. Under these conditions, we obtain the concentration of [A Bm] as the concentration of B varies, and the graph of log [A Bm] versus log [B] yields a straight line of slope m. In this way, we can determine n and m, the numbers of metal ions and ligands, respectively, in the formula for the complex. Once the 

---

In the preceding section, we have described two methods that are frequently used to determine the composition of complexes in solution. We will now turn our attention to a consideration of the simultaneous equilibria that are involved in complex formation. The widely used approach described here is known as Bjerrum s method, and it was described by Jannik Bjerrum many years ago. 

In recent years, a large number of polydentate heterocyclic ligands showing high resistivity to hydrolysis and radiolysis have been studied. The application of such ligands to separation problem was researched in many works [27-41,81,109,110]. As a rule, these works present data on separation factors, number and composition of complexes in solution. But indirect techniques do not give any information on structure of the complexes, and adequate structural investigations are rare. 

X = C104,N03lT139] Dissolution of AIX3 in MeOH. Complexes prepared in situ. Composition of complexes in solution determined by NMR spectroscopy. 

It is possible to determine the concentration of certain metal ions by performing a titration in which the complexation of the metal is the essential reaction. Typically, a chelating agent such as EDTA is used because the complexes formed are so stable. The specific composition of complexes formed in solutions often depends on the concentrations of the reactants. As a part of the study of the chemistry of coordination compounds, some attention must be given to the systematic treatment of topics related to the composition and stability of complexes in solution. This chapter is devoted to these topics. 

The factors that control the equilibrium composition of sugars in solution are complex. Although the well-established preference for substituents in six-membered rings to be equatorial rather than axial is important, it is not always the overriding factor. The next section introduces a new structural feature that plays a significant part in determining carbohydrate conformations and a/p anomeric ratios. 

Ru(tap)J (complex 2) of DL-methionine, and complex 1 is shown in Figure 1. The composition of 2 in solution was determined by Job s method of continuous variation and the metal ligand ratio was found to be 2 1. The pH of the solution was adjusted by adding NaOH/HClO, and the measurements were carried out with the help of a Sartorius make digital pH meter (PB 11) with an accuracy of 0.01 unit. 

Interaction of Metal Complexes with Organic Ligands and Metal Alkoxides or Chemical Modiflcation of Complexes in Solutions (Method 2.5). This approach provides an important alternative to the Method 2.2 in the preparation of derivatives of late transition elements (the homometallic alkoxides of those being insoluble and not reactive polymeric solids). The reaction stoichiometry and conditions are dependent on the nature of reactants and on the composition of the product to be obtained. In some cases the reaction is facile and provides the desired products as the result of mixing the reactants in proper ratio (usually in toluene) and subjecting them to short reflux, for example (Boul-maaz, 1997 Kessler, 2003) ... 

The formation of such materials may be monitored by several techniques. One of the most useful methods is and C-nmr spectroscopy where stable complexes in solution may give rise to characteristic shifts of signals relative to the uncomplexed species (43). Solution nmr spectroscopy has also been used to detect the presence of soHd inclusion compound (after dissolution) and to determine composition (host guest ratio) of the material. Infrared spectroscopy (126) and combustion analysis are further methods to study inclusion formation. For general screening purposes of soHd inclusion stmctures, the x-ray powder diffraction method is suitable (123). However, if detailed stmctures are requited, the single crystal x-ray diffraction method (127) has to be used. 

In the complex system containing APA (AdPA), La(III), and dye (either Ars-I or XO), strong adsorption of dye and La occurs at pH 6-8. Analysis of UV-Vis of prepared solids shows formation of MLC. Their composition, UV-Vis adsorption maxima ()i, mn) and the shifts relatively to the monoligand La-dye complexes in solution (A)i, mn) are shown in the table below. Ars-III was unsuitable for MLC, as it strongly complexes with La at pH=2-5 and desorbs it from surface of AdPA- and APA-silica. 

The type of complex present in each solution depends on the acidity of the solution. In particular, HF solutions with concentrations lower than 25% contain niobium only in the form of NbOF52 complexes, whereas significant amounts of NbF6 ions are found in solutions containing 35% HF and higher. Table 44 shows the composition of complex ions in solutions of different concentrations, as found by Keller [171]. 

The process of separating the intermediate products from the purified solutions, in the form of solid complex fluoride salts or hydroxides, is also related to the behavior of tantalum and niobium complexes in solutions of different compositions. The precipitation of complex fluoride compounds must be performed under conditions that prevent hydrolysis, whereas the precipitation of hydroxides is intended to be performed along with hydrolysis in order to reduce contamination of the oxide material by fluorine. 

We think, therefore, that the conformation, chain and segment mobilities in the attached macromolecules can play a significant role in the shielding behavior of the polymeric stationary phase as well as in the processes of its formation of complexes with solutes. Obviously, the chromatographic studies relevant to composite supports suffer from a lack of information on the structure of the attached polymer. Nevertheless, we will attempt to point out some relevant data from independent studies on polymer adsorption and/or graft polymerization. 

C, which leads to a break in the pressure-composition curve at BF3 Ir = 2 1. The formation of the 1 1 complex in solution is indicated by titrations. Insertion of InCl into the Fe—Fe bond in boiling dioxane yields [T7 -C CO)2Fe]2lnCl in 55% yield. The only group-VIIA compound that forms an addition compound with a group-lIIB halide, namely with BF3, is [(i7 -Cp)2ReH]The formation of (t -Cp),ReH BF3 is established when (T7 -Cp),ReH is titrated tensimetrically in toluene with BF3 at 0°C. 

Determination of the catalytically active species derived from 1 in solution. Spectrophotoraetric titration of the backbone ligand 5 with copper(II) acetate in methanol revealed formation of a dinuclear copper(ll) complex species Cu2L.3h(OAc) above a 1 2 molar ratio. A mononuclear copper(ll) species CuL 2h (6) dominates at a 1 1 molar ratio of 5 and copper(ll) acetate. Control experiments for the assignment of putative structures based on the obtained spectroscopic data included a UVA is spectroscopic titration of 5 with anhydrous sodium acetate in the presence of copper(ll) chloride and revealed that acetate is necessary for the formation of a copper (11) complex in methanol. The composition of 1 in methanol is the same as determined by elemental analysis for the sohd state. 

Another method for determining the composition of a complex in solution is that known as Job s method or the method of continuous variations. Suppose that the formation of a complex between metal A and m ligands B can be shown as... 

This procedure has been used successfully to determine the composition of many complexes in solution. It is possible to extend this method to cases where more than one complex is formed but the application is quite difficult. Like the logarithmic method, Job s method can be applied to other cases of molecular interaction and is not limited to the formation of coordination compounds. Both methods are based on the assumption that one complex is dominant in the equilibrium mixture. Numerous other methods for determining the number of metal ions and ligands in complexes have been devised, but they are beyond the introduction to the topic presented here. 

Substitutional Disorder In Regular Solid Solutions. Most simple ionic solutions in which substitution occurs in one sublattice only are not ideal, but regular 2, J3) Most complex ionic solid solutions in which substitution occurs in more than one sublattice are not only regular in the sense of Hildebrand s definition (15) but also exhibit substitutional disorder. The Equations describing the activities of the components as a function of the composition of their solid solutions are rather complex ( 7, V7, 1 ), and these can be evaluated best for each individual case. Both type II and type III distributions can result from these conditions. 

The description of the double layer reported in Figures 3 and 22 is only approximate the composition of the electrode/solution region is somewhat more complex. The double layer has been studied in most detail for a mercury electrode immersed in an aqueous solution. According to Gouy-Chapman-Stem there are several layers of solution in contact with the electrode, see Figure 25. 

The factors which influence the rate of dissolution of iron oxides are the properties of the overall system (e. g. temperature, UV light), the composition of the solution phase (e.g. pH, redox potential, concentration of acids, reductants and complexing agents) and the properties of the oxide (e. g. specific surface area, stoichiometry, crystal chemistry, crystal habit and presence of defects or guest ions). Models which take all of these factors into account are not available. In general, only the specific surface area, the composition of the solution and in some cases the tendency of ions in solution to form surface complexes are considered. 

---