Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Compatibility testing simulated

Chrzanowski FA, Ulissi LA, Fegely BJ, Newman AC. Preformulation excipient compatibility testing application of a differential scanning calorimetric method versus a wet granulation simulating, isothermal stress method. Drug Devel Ind Pharm 1986 12(6) 783-800. [Pg.107]

With these data, one can determine the dielectric curve the machine must have when switched with such an interrupting device. This can be compared with the actual dielectric curve of the machine (Figure 17.18) obtained from its manufacturer to decide the compatibility of the interrupting device for the machine or vice versa and the extent of surge protection, if necessary. For more details and results of similar simulation tests, see Central Board of Irrigation and Power (1995). [Pg.578]

A complete set of intermolecular potential functions has been developed for use in computer simulations of proteins in their native environment. Parameters have been reported for 25 peptide residues as well as the common neutral and charged terminal groups. The potential functions have the simple Coulomb plus Lennard-Jones form and are compatible with the widely used models for water, TIP4P, TIP3P and SPC. The parameters were obtained and tested primarily in conjunction with Monte Carlo statistical mechanics simulations of 36 pure organic liquids and numerous aqueous solutions of organic ions representative of subunits in the side chains and backbones of proteins... [Pg.46]

It is also important to correct the raw vapour pressure data for any pad gas which was present in the test cell. This can be done by subtracting the partial pressure of any non-condensible pad gas which was present in the test cell, to obtain the vapour pressure (see A2.7.1). Because pressure transducers may not be very accurate at the bottom end of their range, it is advisable to vent the test cell to atmosphere, once it is filledand before sealing it and heating to the initial runaway temperature, so that a reliable initial pad gas pressure is known. (This may not always be compatible with the desire to simulate the runaway scenario within the test.) An alternative is to evacuate both test cell and containment vessel before the reactants are added so that there is no pad gas and no correction is needed,... [Pg.137]

A compilation of available lead retention data is given in Table III, indicating only the most important conditions of a given test, where the information was available. With the exception of the work with pelleted vanadia catalysts (14), all the data pertain to lead levels in the range of 0.01-0.5 g Pb/gal, which was the range of interest in the years from 1972 to 1975, when the limits for contaminant levels in gasoline compatible with catalyst operation were actively considered. The data in the table cover an extremely wide set of conditions and include laboratory simulation, dynamometer, and vehicle fleet tests. Nevertheless, with a few exceptions, the lead retention falls within a relatively narrow band between 13 and 30%. [Pg.321]

Assays for potency, preservative effectiveness, compatibility with primary container-closure system, off-torque, simulated use testing, etc., should be handled in a manner similar to that used for conventional liquid solutions, with the provision that the container is well-mixed prior to sampling. [Pg.3609]

In ASTM F78-98 Standard Practice for Selecting Generic Biological Tests Methods for Materials and Devices , the selection test methods to evaluate medical devices is described. Regarding hemocompatibility tests for blood compatibility, hemolysis, and complement activation are described. Under blood compatibility, hemolysis and thrombosis are described as the most obvious examples of incompatibility with blood. It is suggested that thrombogenicity (formation of thromboemboli or platelet activation) be tested under dynamic conditions that simulate in the use procedures for the device. Complement activation is of concern in some cases and should be tested in vitro by assessing the status of various complement components. However, complement activation will probably not represent the only portion of the inflammatory response stimulated by medical devices. [Pg.1309]

In Section VI, along with the scenario introduced in Section V, we reexamine slow motions in liquid water, together with the check of predictability of our hypothesized interpretation. It will be shown that almost all the data examined there are compatible with our scenario, and some simulations using artificial molecules, which are obtained by introducing and changing several parameters in real molecules, are done to test the proposed hypothesis [14],... [Pg.378]

Preservatives should not usually be included in parenteral formulations except where a multidose product is being developed. The Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) Notes for Guidance on Inclusion of Antioxidants and Antimicrobial Preservatives in Medicinal Products states that the physical and chemical compatibility of the preservative (or antioxidant) with the other constituents of the formulation, the container and closure must be demonstrated during the development process. The minimum concentration of preservative should be used, which gives the required level of efficacy, as tested using pharmacopoeial methods. Certain preservatives should be avoided under certain circumstances, and preservatives should be avoided entirely for some specialised routes. The guidelines also require that both the concentration and efficacy of the preservative are monitored over the shelf life of the product. In multidose injectable products, the efficacy of the preservative must be established under simulated in-use conditions. Table 9.2 shows some of the most commonly encountered preservatives in licensed products and their typical concentrations. [Pg.336]

Testing for seals and gaskets. Unlike lining for vessels, seals and gaskets cannot be tested in full simulation, so the total compatibility is determined piecemeal, i.e., chemical compatibility and evaluation of the material in the gasketed joint. It takes experience to put the information together to make a sound decision. [Pg.151]


See other pages where Compatibility testing simulated is mentioned: [Pg.234]    [Pg.1060]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.970]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.1674]    [Pg.2226]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.1239]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.488]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.180]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.150 ]




SEARCH



Compatibility testing

Testing simulated

© 2024 chempedia.info