Comparison of Performance

Table 4. Comparison of Performance of Materials by Functional Class...

Figure 11-50 illustrates the type of comparisons of performance that may be made to better interpret a given set of design parameters. 

Table 10.5 gives a preliminary comparison of performance of dielectric elastomer with other acmator technologies. The reported values are collected from different sources and are not based on uniform measurement standards. ... 

Comparison of Performance Measures Before AND After Implementation of... 

Fig. 13. Final comparison of performances for both decision policies.

Figure 5.17 Comparison of performance of a typical laboratory column (LBC) with those of micro-reactor devices falling film micro reactor (FFMR) micro bubble column (MBC I and MBC II) [38].

Measurements of individual laboratory performance provides for comparisons between laboratories. It then follows to ask why some laboratories report data that are more accurate and precise than do their peers, and a well designed external quality assessment scheme allows investigation of some of the important factors (see below). A comparison of performance between individual laboratories also helps to stimulate those who are not so successful to improve (or abandon the assay) and those who do well to continue with their expertise. Finally, changes of performance may be monitored as a consequence of some new factor, e.g. purchase of a new piece of equipment, work carried out by a different analyst, change to the methodology etc. 

Comparison of performance of single CSTR and plug flow reactor for the nth-order reactions... 

Comparison of performance of a series of N equal-size CSTR reactors with a plug flow reactor for the first-order reaction... 

An example of a direct comparison of performance properties with and without added flame retardants for "New ignition resistant polycarbonate resins" is provided in a paper by workers at the Dow Chemical Company (32). The technology of the flame retardant additives is de scribed as including... 

Comparisons of Performing Chemosensory Behaviors in African Elephants... 

Table 6. Optimisation of pellet size and shape. The catalyst volume required to obtain a specified S02 conversion is the basis for comparison of performance.

Fig. 8 BZ Comparison of performance scores in physostigmine treated vs. untreated (same subject)...

S.J. Dixon and R.G. Brereton, Comparison of performance of five common classifiers represented as boundary methods Euclidean distance to centroids, linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, learning vector quantization and support vector machines, as dependent on data structure, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst, 95, 1-17 (2009). 

Figure 6.2 Comparison of performance of mixed flow and plug flow reactors for any reaction kinetics.

Figure 6.16 Comparison of performance of recycle and plug flow for first-order reactions...

Figure 6.17 Comparison of performance of recycle reactors with plug flow reactors for elementary second-order reactions (Personal communication, from T. J. Fitzgerald and P. Fillesi) ...

Fig. 28. Comparison of performance of reactors for the plug flow and dispersed plug flow models. Reaction is of first order, aA- products, and constant density, occurring in a closed vessel (L14, L15).

Tai, G. C. C., De Jong, H. (1997). A comparison of performance of tetraploid progenies produced by diploid and their vegetatively doubled (tetraploid) couterpart parents. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 94, 303-308. 

Comparison of Performance Parameters of Jet Engines. The excellent diagram below is taken from pp 96 97 of Ref 1... 

TABLE 14.3. Comparisons of Performance and Costs of Extraction Equipment... 

Table 5 Comparison of performance of quartz crystal microbalance chemosensors using molecularly imprinted polymer for determination of caffeine... 

After presenting the criteria for performance evaluation of the three different techniques, we explain their meaning and significance. In the next section, we will comment on the appropriateness of the criteria and the reference points. This discussion relates to coverage of enzyme performance criteria in Chapter 2. Jacobsen and Finney suggest the following five criteria for comparison of performance ( Jacobsen s five criteria ) ... 

---