Collaborative Behavioral

Buelke-Sam, J., Kimmel, C.A. and Adams, J. (1985). Design considerations in screening for behavioral teratogens Results of the collaborative behavioral teratology study. Neurobehav. Toxicol. Teratol. 7 537-789. 

S.V. Vorhees, Behavioral effects of prenatal methylmercury in rats A parallel trial to the Collaborative Behavioral Teratology Study, Neurobeh. Toxicol. Teratol., 7(6) (1985) 717-725. 

C.A. Kimmel and J. Buelke-Sam, Collaborative Behavioral Teratology Study ... 

Collaborative Behavioral Teratology Study Preliminary Research,... 

An atypical simultaneous presence of both anionic and cationic modifiers was reported to achieve better efficiency and shorter analysis times, probably because of the competition between the solute and the similarly charged IPR [139-142]. Actually this strategy mimics the collaborative behavior of the cation and the anion when ILs are used as IPRs. 

Buelke-Sam J, Kimmel CA, Adams, et al. 1985. Collaborative behavioral teratology study Results. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol 7 591-624. 

Finally, it is important to consider culture—both occupational and organizational— because it can override collaborative behaviors encouraged by the formal design. In one sense, culture is generated and transmitted through social networks. 

In future work, we want to further investigate how complex software safety requirements, such as freedom from interference, are formalized using our approach, and we want to identify suitable safety patterns for them. These complex safety patterns are challenging, since they are composed by different mechanisms and ensure safety through their collaborative behavior. Moreover, we want to conduct a controlled experiment to quantify the benefits our approach and understand the concrete benefits in terms of effort saving when applying it to the development of the complete software for a given safety-critical function. 

Credibility refers to the extent to which a firm is confident about its supply chain partners predictability, reliability, honesty, and competence (Pavlou 2002a Johnson et al. 2004). This dimension corresponds to Johnson et al. s (2004) dependability. It is the firm s expectation that supply chain partners will act in a dependable and predictable manner and can be counted on to perform their duties (Anderson and Weitz 1989). The firm will also hold a positive attitude toward the supply chain partner s honesty and integrity. For example, the company will believe that its partners will not share distorted information with it The credibility dimension of tmst denotes intentions of collaborative behaviors that may stem from making opportunism unreasonable or costly (Pavlou 2002a). Any long-term supply chain partnerships will require partners to fidfill their obligations and behave competently, consistently, and reliably (Zaheer et al. 1998 Tuten and Urban 2001). 

---