Cohesive energies, Table

The results obtained show that in these blends the removal of a filler from the bulk to the interface occms from the phase of polymer characterized by higher value of cohesion energy (Table 12.4) (from PS to the interface with PO and PDMS, from PO to the interface with PDMS). As for the phase with low cohesion energy, such redistribution here either is absent (from PDMS to the interface with PE, PS, PIB) or is insignificant if the cohesion energy difference for polymer components is small (from PE or PP to the interface with PS). 

Table 8.2 Values of the Cohesive Energy Density (CED) for Some Common Solvents and the Solubility Parameter 6 for These Solvents and Some Common Polymers...

Note that the theoretical spall strength now depends upon the cohesive energy as well as the bulk modulus. Representative values for selected metals are shown in Table 8.1. These can be compared with experimental spall strengths in later sections. 

Table I. Cohesive energies of shallow tori the parameters n, and ii, are the number of hexagons along the outer and inner eirele, respeetively (see Fig. 6). Here Af is the tiumber of atoms in a torus...

The diameters of the inside and outside circles, the pitch length, and the cohesive energy per atom for helices are given in Table 2. The number of pentagons. 

Table 2. Structural parameters, cohesive energies per atom, and spring constant for helices C4(,0 and C,4(, here / and r, are outer and inner diameter of a helix, respeetively...

Table 8-6. Internal Pressure and Cohesive Energy Density (ced) of Solvents...

The materials for solid solutions of transition elements in j3-rh boron are prepared by arc melting the component elements or by solid-state diffusion of the metal into /3-rhombohedral (/3-rh) boron. Compositions as determined by erystal structure and electron microprobe analyses together with the unit cell dimensions are given in Table 1. The volume of the unit cell (V ) increases when the solid solution is formed. As illustrated in Fig. 1, V increases nearly linearly with metal content for the solid solution of Cu in /3-rh boron. In addition to the elements listed in Table 1, the expansion of the unit cell exceeds 7.0 X 10 pm for saturated solid solutions " of Ti, V, (2o, Ni, As, Se and Hf in /3-rh boron, whereas the increase is smaller for the remaining elements. The solubility of these elements does not exceed a few tenths at %. The microhardness of the solid solution increases with V . Boron is a brittle material, indicating the accommodation of transition-element atoms in the -rh boron structure is associated with an increase in the cohesion energy of the solid. 

TABLE 1.2 Internal Pressures and Cohesive Energy Densities for Some Common Solvents (25° C)9... 

A somewhat more complex treatment of group contributions (61) utilizes the fact that the tola cohesive energy density, E(coh) of the chain unit can be determined from Fedors" table of group contributions (62) the ratio of E(coh) to the effective number of freely rotating groups per unit, ai is proportional to Tg. That is. 

We have already mentioned that silver chloride is readily soluble in liquid ammonia. Because it is slighdy less polar than water and has lower cohesion energy, intermolecular forces make it possible for organic molecules to create cavities in liquid ammonia. As a result, most organic compounds are more soluble in liquid ammonia than they are in water. Physical data for liquid ammonia are summarized in Table 10.2. 

To illustrate the application of the imf and steric parameters we consider cohesive energies of MeX at 298.15 K taken from the compilation of Majer and Svoboda73. The data set (Table 9) contains no compounds capable of hydrogen bonding. We have therefore used the IMF equation in the form ... 

Table IV. Molar-Attraction Group Constants For Cohesive Energy Density Determination...

Table XI gives the room-temperature, atmospheric pressure crystal structures, densities, and atomic volumes, along with the melting points and standard enthalpies of vaporization (cohesive energies), for the actinide metals. These particular physical properties have been chosen as those of concern to the preparative chemist who wishes to prepare an actinide metal and then characterize it via X-ray powder diffraction. The numerical values have been selected from the literature by the authors.

---