Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Coherent averaging Hamiltonian

Thus, reaching high resolution is always a matter of compromise depending on the kind of informations needed and strategies to cancel or reintroduce anisotropies of selected interactions were developed in direct space (powdered or single crystal, mechanical spinning (MAS), etc.), in the space of coherences (averaged Hamiltonians, multidimensional NMR sequences, etc.) or combined methods (MQMAS, etc.). [Pg.134]

According to the coherent averaging theory,3,4,53 the zero-order average Hamiltonian can be obtained straightforwardly... [Pg.29]

A number of theoretical transfer functions have been reported for specific experiments. However, analytical expressions were derived only for the simplest Hartmann-Hahn experiments. For heteronuclear Hartmann-Hahn transfer based on two CW spin-lock fields on resonance, Maudsley et al. (1977) derived magnetization-transfer functions for two coupled spins 1/2 for matched and mismatched rf fields [see Eq. (30)]. In IS, I2S, and I S systems, all coherence transfer functions were derived for on-resonance irradiation including mismatched rf fields. More general magnetization-transfer functions for off-resonance irradiation and Hartmann-Hahn mismatch were derived for Ij S systems with N < 6 (Muller and Ernst, 1979 Chingas et al., 1981 Levitt et al., 1986). Analytical expressions of heteronuclear Hartmann-Hahn transfer functions under the average Hamiltonian, created by the WALTZ-16, DIPSI-2, and MLEV-16 sequences (see Section XI), have been presented by Ernst et al. (1991) for on-resonant irradiation with matched rf fields. Numerical simulations of heteronuclear polarization-transfer functions for the WALTZ-16 and WALTZ-17 sequence have also been reported for various frequency offsets (Ernst et al., 1991). [Pg.122]

On the other hand, vide infra) in the case of developing multiple quantum coherence of coupled groups of protons, one wishes an average Hamiltonian for the homonuclear dipolar interaction, / dt 3fDn(t), which is not zero, but is manipulated such that the density operator develops multiple quantum coherence as time progresses, as outlined in the next section. [Pg.171]

The SRTS sequence consists of a preparatory pulse and an arbitrary long train of the phase-coherent RF pulses of the same flip angle applied with a constant short-repetition time. As was noted above, the "short time" in this case should be interpreted as the pulse spacing T within the sequence that meets the condition T T2 Hd. The state that is established in the spin system after the time, T2, is traditionally defined as the "steady-state free precession" (SSFP), ° and includes two other states (or sub-states) quasi-stationary, that exists at times T2effective relaxation time) and stationary, that is established after the time " 3Tie after the start of the sequence.The SSFP is a very particular state which requires a specific mechanism for its description. This mechanism was devised in articles on the basis of the effective field concept and canonical transformations. Later approaches on the basis of the average-Hamiltonian theory were developed. ... [Pg.154]

The tiny difference between hard pulses and their delta-function approximation can be exploited to control coherence. Variants on the magic echo that work despite a large spread in resonance offsets are demonstrated using the zeroth- and first-order average Hamiltonian terms, for C-13 NMR in Cgo- The Si-29 NMR linewidth of silicon has been reduced by a factor of about 70 000 using this approach, which also has potential applications in MR microscopy and imaging of solids. [Pg.425]

The scheme we employ uses a Cartesian laboratory system of coordinates which avoids the spurious small kinetic and Coriolis energy terms that arise when center of mass coordinates are used. However, the overall translational and rotational degrees of freedom are still present. The unconstrained coupled dynamics of all participating electrons and atomic nuclei is considered explicitly. The particles move under the influence of the instantaneous forces derived from the Coulombic potentials of the system Hamiltonian and the time-dependent system wave function. The time-dependent variational principle is used to derive the dynamical equations for a given form of time-dependent system wave function. The choice of wave function ansatz and of sets of atomic basis functions are the limiting approximations of the method. Wave function parameters, such as molecular orbital coefficients, z,(f), average nuclear positions and momenta, and Pfe(0, etc., carry the time dependence and serve as the dynamical variables of the method. Therefore, the parameterization of the system wave function is important, and we have found that wave functions expressed as generalized coherent states are particularly useful. A minimal implementation of the method [16,17] employs a wave function of the form ... [Pg.49]

Now let s look at something we do not know the answer to the ideal isotropic mixing Hamiltonian. This is the ideal TOCSY mixing sequence that leads to in-phase to in-phase coherence transfer. The ideal sequence of pulses creates this average environment expressed by the Hamiltonian. The Zeeman Hamiltonian that represents the chemical shifts goes away and we have only the isotropic (i.e., same in all directions) /-coupling Hamiltonian ... [Pg.486]

The most important criteria for experimental Hartmann-Hahn mixing sequences are their coherence-transfer properties, which can be assessed based on the created effective Hamiltonians, propagators, and the evolution of the density operator. Additional criteria reflect the robustness with respect to experimental imperfections and experimental constraints, such as available rf amplitudes and the tolerable average rf power. For some spectrometers, simplicity of the sequence can be an additional criterion. Finally, for applications with short mixing periods, such as one-bond heteronuclear Hartmann-Hahn experiments, the duration Tj, of the basis sequence can be important. [Pg.145]

In a heteronuclear two-spin system, spin I and spin S, an AHT analysis to the first-order reveals the coherent CP transfer between the spins. We assume that the difference in rf-field strengths equals the MAS frequency, e.g., by setting the rf field on the I channel to four times the MAS frequency and the rf field on the S channel to three times the MAS frequency. Transforming the description into the rf field frames and averaging over one rotor period provide us with an effective Hamiltonian described by... [Pg.328]

The results presented in this chapter show that the use of proper effective models, in combination with calculations based on the exact vibrational Hamiltonian, constitutes a promising approach to study the laser driven vibrational dynamics of polyatomic molecules. In this context, the MCTDH method is an invaluable tool as it allows to compute the laser driven dynamics of polyatomic molecules with a high accuracy. However, our models still contain simplifications that prevent a direct comparison of our results with potential experiments. First, the rotational motion of the molecule was not explicitly described in the present work. The inclusion of the rotation in the description of the dynamics of the molecule is expected to be important in several ways. First, even at low energies, the inclusion of the rotational structure would result in a more complicated system with different selection rules. In addition, the orientation of the molecule with respect to the laser field polarization would make the control less efficient because of the rotational averaging of the laser-molecule interaction and the possible existence of competing processes. On the other hand, the combination of the laser control of the molecular alignment/orientation with the vibrational control proposed in this work could allow for a more complete control of the dynamics of the molecule. A second simplification of our models concerns the initial state chosen for the simulations. We have considered a molecule in a localized coherent superposition of vibrational eigenstates but we have not studied the preparation of this state. We note here that a control scheme for the localiza-... [Pg.182]


See other pages where Coherent averaging Hamiltonian is mentioned: [Pg.42]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.558]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.5221]    [Pg.850]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.633]    [Pg.129]   


SEARCH



Coherent averaging Hamiltonian theory

© 2024 chempedia.info