Free surface cluster

Figure 8. TEM and optical absorption of the sample implanted with 5 x 10 Au /cm (a) TEM cross-sectional micrograph (dashed lines represent the free surface and film-substrate interface) (b) nanoparticles size distribution (c) simulated optical spectra (1) Au cluster in a non-absorbing medium with n = 1.6 (2) Au cluster in polyimide (absorbing) (3) Au(core)-C(shell) cluster in a nonabsorbing medium with n = 1.6 (4) the experimental spectrum of Au-implanted polyimide sample, (d) X-ray diffraction patterns as a function of the implantation fiuence.

Measurement by means of a wall optical sensor The thickness of a film and the slope of its free surface can also be measured by means of a wall optical sensor, as proposed by Ohba et al. (1984). This sensor consists of a cluster of seven optical fibers mounted flush with the wall (Fig. 3.33). A laser beam passed through the central fiber is reflected by the free surface onto the other fiber tips, which collect the light and transmit it to two photodiodes. The light intensities received by these two detectors enable the film thickness and the inclination angle to be determined. 

Here Ii(t - u) is the growth current of a single cluster born at time t = u, [1 - 0(u)] is the actual free surface fraction available for the nucleus formation, and J u) is the nucleation rate at time t = u. Similarly to the case of - instantaneous nucleation an expression for the current density jN(t)canbe derived accounting either for direct clusters coalescence [iii-vi] or for overlapping of planar diffusion zones within which nucleation is fully arrested [vii-xi], In the latter case,... 

We have been able to interpret this experimental data by means of a very simple continuum model. Assuming the cluster to be plastic with a uniform internal stress, the relationship between this internal stress and the radius of curvature of the cluster s free surface is given by the Young equation... 

Not discussed herein is very recent experimental work in which the thermal distribution of molecules and atoms of a cluster after surface impact has been measured and compared to information theory. There are two reasons why these results should be mentioned. One is that the experiment used a cluster beam incident at an angle (f) with respect to the normal. It measured the component of velocity parallel to the surface. But in the plane containing the incident beam, there are two such components. One at an angle tt — 0 with the cluster beam and one at an angle TT + (j>. The observed velocity distribution in both directions was identical. This is a computation-free proof of the equilibration. The other point is the magnitude of the measured temperature which was of the order of 15 000 °K, same as that measured for electrons boiling out of the impact. ... 

The term nanocatalysis was introduced by Somorjai in 1994 when he used confined electrons of an STM tip to induce an electrochemical process. Earlier experiments on free clusters pointed towards the possibility of using small clusters with intrinsically confined valence electrons as catalysts to tune the properties atom-by-atom. These two completely different pioneering ideas have become further sophisticated during the last few years. It has become possible to use size-selected clusters on surfaces to catalyze simple chemical reactions and to tune the catalytic properties with size as well as using the tip of an STM to control every step of a chemical reaction on a local scale. With these examples a deeper understanding of nanocatalytic factors is now emerging and such studies will have profound impact on the catalysis of systems at the ultimate size limit. 

The coadsorption of CO and 02 on the metastable Au8 cluster described above has been further examined in a series of experiments and calculations by Yoon et al.170 These calculations compared the Au8 cluster bound on an F-center on Mg(001) and on a defect-free surface. Experimentally, the former is active for CO oxidation while the latter is not.170 The calculations confirm that the cluster is much more strongly bound on the F-center than on the defect-free surface. The net charge transfer to the cluster-adsorbate complex was 1.5e (le) on the F-center (defect-free surface). A key point of this combined experimental and DFT study was that shifts in CO stretching frequencies on these clusters could be used as a means to probe the charging of the clusters. 

Clusters on Surfaces. - In many experimental studies clusters deposited or grown on some surface are studied instead of free, isolated clusters in the gas phase. Of course, the presence of a substrate may modify the structure of the clusters in unknown ways and, therefore, theoretical studies of such systems are highly relevant. 

Size Effect. With increase in cluster size the occurrence of RA is significantly suppressed. In Au clusters of approximately 10 nm in mean size, the rapid diffusion of Cu atoms takes place only at the shell-shaped region beneath the free surface of an individual cluster, while pure gold is retained at the center of the cluster. In Au clusters of approximately 30 nm in the mean size, the RA does not take place. It should be emphasized that the critical size of the RA increases with the negative heat of solution and temperature. 

Although the environment ofthe clusters is different in solutions and at the surface of silver halide crystals, we proposed to extend the same growth mechanism, which was demonstrated by pulse radiolysisfor Ag J clusters free in solution, to a theoretical explanation ofthe development process in photography [7] (Fig. 10). The development occurs in both cases at the interface between an aqueous solution of an electron donor and a silver cluster acting as an autocatalytic growing site alternately accepting electrons and silver ions. 

The magnetization on the Ni and Co clusters is largely unchanged also in the supported species. In some cases, however, there is a partial quenching of the magnetic moment which is generally restricted to the metal atoms in direct contact with the oxide anions [203]. Thus, despite the relatively strong MgO/M4 bonds (C04 is bound on MgO by 2.0eV, Ni4 by 2.4eV), the electronic structure of supported transition metal moieties is only moderately perturbed. These conclusions are valid only for an ideal defect-free surface ... 

---