ChromSword predictions

Figure 3.24 ChromSword prediction for a last two peaks come cioser together, as in gradient from 45 to 80% methanol in 25 min the real measurement shown in Figure 3.22. based on the linear model. With one click The input data are those from Tabie 3.4. the quadratic function is selected and the...

Alternatively, the results from the gradient runs for each sample can be inputted into Drylab, ACD, or Chromsword for further optimization (see Sections 8.5.6.11). For the predicted experimental conditions (i.e., gradient slope, temperature, flow rate), if desired selectivity and resolution can be obtained, an experiment can be run for verification. The peak purity for the main analyte (MS and DAD detection) should be checked in the verification run. If the desired selectivity and/or the target analyte are not spectrally homogeneous, go to Step 6, Figure 8-37. 

There are two main approaches to the prediction of retention times based on chemical structures. Both use a training set of compounds to characterize the system prior to creation of a prediction expression. The hrst (used in ChromSword ) uses experimental retention times for a set of prescribed compounds to create an expression based on molar volume and energy of interaction with water [43] ... 

Finally, structure-based predictive software is commercially available (such as CHROMDREAM, CHROMSWORD or ELUEX) for mobile phase optimisation in RPC. This software incorporates some features of the expert system, as it predicts the retention on the basis of the molecular structures of all sample components (which should be known) and the known behaviour of model compounds on various HPLC columns. No initial experimental runs are necessary as the retention data are calculated from the additive contributions of the individual structural elements to the retention, contained in the software databa.se and consequently optimum composition of the mobile phase is suggested. Such predictions are necessarily only approximate, do not take into account stereochemical and intramolecular interaction effects, and predicted separation conditions can be used rather as the recommendation for the initial experimental run in the subsequent optimisation procedure. 

Structure-based commercial optimization softwar (e.g., Chromdream, Chromsword, or Eluex) incorporate some features of the expert system, as the retention is predicted based on the additive contributions of thdS... 

ChromSword Auto Software incorporated into Waters AMDS. Useful tool for optimizing isocratic and gradient methods and for predicting optimum column configurations. Similar to DryLab and can also work 14,000... 

HiPac (53) from Phase Separation is another commercially available software package. In several aspects this software is similar to DryLab, but its most important feature is that it can estimate the optimum mobile-phase conditions for the separation of the mixture at hand or only a selected number of peaks. Recently, ChromSword (commercially available from Merck, Germany) was introduced (34). It uses a retention mc el based on solvophobic theory. The input for this package can be the structural formulas of the solutes, the combination of structural formulas and retention data from a single run, or retention data from two runs. Data from additional runs are incorporated into the model, and prediction accuracy below 3% can be achieved under these circumstances. 

ChromSword includes an optimization algorithm. It can, however, also be used as a prediction program ... 

Optimal isocratic and/or gradient conditions are predicted by computer optimization software by retention time and peak width modeling, e.g., with DryLab (LC Resources, BASi Northwest Laboratory Services, Walnut Creek, CA, USA), LC Simulator (Advanced Chemistry Development, Toronto, Canada), or ChromSword (VWR International, Darmstadt, Germany). 

ChromSword supports the optimization of separation for polynomial models up to a power of six. Thus, the most complex retention-concentration effects can be described and the separation optimized. AU polynomial models predict the retention of solutes rather precisely in the interpolation region of those concentrations studied. These models are less reliable in the extrapolation region. For example, if experiments were performed with 40% and 50% of organic solvent in a mobile phase, one can expect rather good prediction of retention and separation in the region between these concentrahons and less accuracy in the regions of 30-35% and 50-55%. Extrapolahon to wider hmits very often leads to substantial deviations between predicted and experimental data. 

There are several software and automated systems for HPLC method development and optimization, such as Drylab , Chromsword , and ACD/AutoChrom MDS, and others (43 7). Their principles can be applied to UHPLC. In addition. Waters Corp. (Milford, MA) has recently promoted Fusion Method Development software. Fusion Method Development software from S-Matrix integrates seamlessly with Water s ACQUITY UPLC and Empower 2 Chromatography software to automate method development. The software automatically generates instrument methods and sample sets. Another feature of this software is to visualize data by statistically fitting the results. However, it cannot generate simulated chromatograms at predicted conditions, like Drylab can. 

---